GLW
Price
$143.30
Change
-$3.35 (-2.28%)
Updated
Jul 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
126.21B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JBL
Price
$311.36
Change
-$1.23 (-0.39%)
Updated
Jul 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.76B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTMI
Price
$123.71
Change
-$7.70 (-5.86%)
Updated
Jul 27 closing price
Capitalization
13.65B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLW or JBL or TTMI

GLW vs JBL vs TTMI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Corning Incorporated (GLW) vs. Jabil Inc. (JBL) vs. TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Corning Incorporated (GLW) has delivered exceptional year-to-date gains driven by AI-related optical communications demand, though recent market activity has led to notable short-term pullbacks ahead of earnings.
  • Jabil Inc. (JBL) maintains steady positioning in electronics manufacturing services, with performance influenced by broader supply chain and industrial electronics trends in recent weeks.
  • TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) has shown strong growth in aerospace, defense, and data center segments, contributing to robust year-to-date returns amid sector momentum.
  • All three stocks operate in interconnected technology and electronics supply chains, exposing them to similar macroeconomic factors such as interest rates, AI investment cycles, and global manufacturing dynamics.
  • Relative performance highlights trade-offs between high-growth optical and printed circuit board exposure versus diversified manufacturing stability.
  • Market sentiment across the group reflects a mix of long-term structural tailwinds in advanced electronics and short-term valuation adjustments observed in recent market activity.

Introduction

Corning Incorporated (GLW), Jabil Inc. (JBL), and TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) represent distinct yet overlapping segments of the electronics and advanced materials ecosystem. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance patterns, and market positioning to assist investors and traders evaluating exposure to optical communications, electronics manufacturing services, and printed circuit board solutions. The analysis focuses on verifiable developments and relative dynamics that may appeal to those monitoring technology supply chains and sector rotation opportunities in the current environment.

GLW Overview and Recent Performance

Corning Incorporated (GLW) specializes in specialty glass, ceramics, and optical communications products, with significant exposure to data center infrastructure and AI-related connectivity solutions. In recent market activity, the stock experienced substantial year-to-date appreciation fueled by demand for optical fiber and components tied to major technology partnerships. However, broader risk-off sentiment in technology names contributed to a sharp retracement over recent weeks, with the share price declining notably from peaks amid profit-taking and pre-earnings positioning. Key influences include ongoing strength in core sales growth from prior quarters and analyst focus on upcoming results, which have shaped investor sentiment around valuation multiples relative to growth prospects.

JBL Overview and Recent Performance

Jabil Inc. (JBL) provides electronics manufacturing services across diverse end markets including healthcare, packaging, and industrial applications. The company’s performance in recent market activity reflects steady operational execution within global supply chains, with sentiment supported by consistent demand in electronics assembly. While specific catalysts have been less pronounced than in pure-play optical or defense names, the stock has navigated broader sector volatility, maintaining relative stability compared to higher-beta peers. Market positioning benefits from diversified customer exposure, which can moderate swings tied to single-segment trends observed in recent weeks.

TTMI Overview and Recent Performance

TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) focuses on printed circuit board manufacturing with notable presence in aerospace and defense as well as data center computing. Recent market activity has featured strong year-to-date gains supported by record quarterly results and backlog expansion in high-reliability segments. The stock has participated in sector advances driven by defense spending and electronics demand but has also experienced short-term corrections aligned with broader market adjustments in recent weeks. Performance reflects both fundamental momentum in end markets and sensitivity to valuation reassessments common across growth-oriented industrial electronics names.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the best-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions are featured in this section. Bots exhibit varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many showing positive historical returns across different market regimes. This resource allows users to explore automated strategies tailored to specific tickers and conditions. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Corning Incorporated (GLW) emphasizes materials innovation in optical and specialty segments, offering higher growth sensitivity to AI infrastructure spending but greater exposure to valuation compression during risk-off periods. Jabil Inc. (JBL) operates as a contract manufacturer with broader end-market diversification, potentially providing more defensive characteristics through supply chain resilience. TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) combines printed circuit board expertise with defense and computing exposure, balancing cyclical industrial demand with program-driven backlog stability. Recent momentum has favored names with direct AI or defense linkages, while risk factors include shared sensitivity to semiconductor cycles, interest rate movements, and global trade dynamics. Valuation sensitivity appears elevated across the group following prior rallies, with market sentiment shifting toward scrutiny of forward multiples amid evolving capital expenditure trends.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in core end markets, relative stability during recent volatility, and positioning within growth segments, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) for its combination of backlog visibility and diversified high-reliability exposure. Corning Incorporated (GLW) shows strong structural tailwinds but faces nearer-term sentiment headwinds, while Jabil Inc. (JBL) offers balanced characteristics suitable for certain risk profiles. These assessments remain probabilistic and subject to ongoing market developments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2026
Stock price -- (GLW: $146.65JBL: $312.59TTMI: $131.41)
Brand notoriety: JBL and TTMI are not notable and GLW is notable
The three companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLW: 63%, JBL: 68%, TTMI: 28%
Market capitalization -- GLW: $126.21B, JBL: $32.76B, TTMI: $13.65B
$GLW is valued at $126.21B, while JBL has a market capitalization of $32.76B, and TTMI's market capitalization is $13.65B. The market cap for tickers in this @Electronic Components ranges from $187.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Electronic Components industry is $12.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJBL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and TTMI’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TTMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTMI is a better buy in the long-term than JBL, which in turn is a better option than GLW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JBL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TTMI’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • JBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TTMI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JBL is a better buy in the short-term than TTMI, which in turn is a better option than GLW.

Price Growth

GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а -5.15% price change this week, while JBL (@Electronic Components) price change was +3.85% , and TTMI (@Electronic Components) price fluctuated -0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLW is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

JBL is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.

TTMI is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-0.98% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLW($126B) has a higher market cap than JBL($32.8B) and TTMI($13.6B). TTMI and GLW has higher P/E ratio than JBL: TTMI (71.42) and GLW (70.50) vs JBL (39.12). TTMI YTD gains are higher at: 90.449 vs. GLW (68.055) and JBL (37.163). GLW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.07B vs. JBL (2.03B) and TTMI (422M). GLW has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. JBL (1.36B) and TTMI (410M). TTMI has less debt than JBL and GLW: TTMI (1.05B) vs JBL (3.89B) and GLW (9.92B). JBL has higher revenues than GLW and TTMI: JBL (33.6B) vs GLW (16.3B) and TTMI (3.1B).
GLWJBLTTMI
Capitalization126B32.8B13.6B
EBITDA4.07B2.03B422M
Gain YTD68.05537.16390.449
P/E Ratio70.5039.1271.42
Revenue16.3B33.6B3.1B
Total Cash1.76B1.36B410M
Total Debt9.92B3.89B1.05B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLW vs JBL vs TTMI: Fundamental Ratings
GLW
JBL
TTMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
725450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
481039
SMR RATING
1..100
541767
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
415143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
845633
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTMI's Valuation (63) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (72) and is in the same range as JBL (79). This means that TTMI's stock grew similarly to GLW’s and similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTMI (39) and is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (48). This means that JBL's stock grew similarly to TTMI’s and somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's SMR Rating (17) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (54) and is somewhat better than the same rating for TTMI (67). This means that JBL's stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s and somewhat faster than TTMI’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTMI (43) and is in the same range as JBL (51). This means that GLW's stock grew similarly to TTMI’s and similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.

TTMI's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (56) and is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (84). This means that TTMI's stock grew similarly to JBL’s and somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLWJBLTTMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVO48.770.59
+1.22%
Novo-Nordisk A/S
GLOO3.190.03
+0.95%
Gloo Holdings Inc.
IDCC258.302.24
+0.87%
InterDigital
LIVE9.55-0.31
-3.14%
Live Ventures
LOMA11.40-0.52
-4.36%
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima

GLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been loosely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then FN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLW
1D Price
Change %
GLW100%
-6.03%
FN - GLW
65%
Loosely correlated
-8.05%
BHE - GLW
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.28%
JBL - GLW
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.93%
TTMI - GLW
59%
Loosely correlated
-9.28%
CLS - GLW
57%
Loosely correlated
-8.80%
More