Advertisement
GTES or KMT or NDSN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Gates Industrial (GTES) vs. Kennametal (KMT) vs. Nordson (NDSN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Nordson (NDSN) has shown the strongest recent momentum, posting record quarterly revenue and lifting its full-year guidance on broad-based organic growth.
- Gates Industrial (GTES) is executing an improving industrial recovery, with its data-center business scaling rapidly and a recently raised outlook.
- Kennametal (KMT) delivered a sharp earnings rebound driven by tungsten pricing, though negative free cash flow from working capital remains a key risk.
- All three are diversified industrial manufacturers, but they differ sharply in end-market exposure, valuation, and earnings quality.
- NDSN trades at a premium multiple after a strong run, while KMT screens inexpensive and GTES sits near a middle ground.
Introduction
Investors evaluating the industrial manufacturing sector often face a choice between cyclical value, structural growth, and premium quality. This stock comparison examines three distinct names — GTES, KMT, and NDSN — to assess their relative performance and market positioning. Gates Industrial, Kennametal, and Nordson each manufacture precision-engineered components, yet they serve different end markets and carry different risk profiles. For traders and long-term investors alike, understanding how these businesses diverge in growth drivers, momentum, and valuation sensitivity can help clarify where each fits within a broader industrial portfolio.
GTES Overview and Recent Performance
GTES, or Gates Industrial Corporation plc, manufactures engineered power transmission and fluid power solutions sold across more than 130 countries. In recent weeks, the company has reported improving demand across both of its segments, with core sales rising in its latest quarter and management raising its full-year outlook for sales, adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), and adjusted earnings per share (EPS). A notable catalyst has been its data-center business, which has more than doubled year over year as liquid-cooling and fluid-transfer projects ramp. Gates is also broadening its North American footprint through an agreement to acquire Timken's industrial belts business. Sentiment remains balanced, however, by weak South American agricultural demand and rising oil-based material costs, which have kept the recovery uneven.
KMT Overview and Recent Performance
KMT, or Kennametal Inc., is an industrial technology leader in tungsten carbide tooling, materials science, and wear-resistant solutions, serving aerospace and defense, energy, earthworks, general engineering, and transportation markets. Recent quarters have delivered a dramatic earnings inflection, with fiscal 2026 organic sales up roughly 19% and adjusted EPS rising sharply from the prior year. A large portion of this gain was driven by pricing actions tied to elevated tungsten costs and favorable timing between raw-material pricing and costs, which inflated margins in the latest quarter. Management has forecast continued revenue growth for the coming fiscal year, but the stock's key risk is cash flow: negative free operating cash flow, driven by tungsten-related working capital and advance supplier payments, weighs on the otherwise strong profit story.
NDSN Overview and Recent Performance
NDSN, or Nordson Corporation, engineers precision dispensing, coating, and fluid-management systems across three segments: Industrial Precision Solutions, Medical and Fluid Solutions, and Advanced Technology Solutions. Recent market activity has favored Nordson, which posted record quarterly revenue and adjusted EPS and raised its full-year guidance on the strength of semiconductor, electronics, and medical demand. Its order backlog has grown substantially year over year, and more than half of its portfolio is now tied to faster-growing semiconductor, electronics, and medical markets, with a large share of revenue classified as recurring aftermarket service. This positioning has driven strong relative performance and a premium valuation, though that same valuation leaves less room for error if growth normalizes after an elevated cycle.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a systematic edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's artificial-intelligence-driven trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and universe of symbols. Because only the most suitable bots for current market conditions earn a place in this featured section, the page serves as a practical starting point for identifying automated strategies aligned with today's environment. Explore the Trending AI Robots to see which algorithms are currently gaining traction.
Head-to-Head Comparison
While all three companies operate in industrial manufacturing, their business models and risk-reward profiles differ meaningfully. NDSN skews toward higher-margin, technology-linked growth through semiconductor and medical exposure, supported by a recurring aftermarket revenue base — but it carries the richest valuation after a strong run. GTES occupies a middle position: a broad industrial recovery plus an emerging data-center growth story, offset by agricultural weakness and input-cost inflation, trading at a modest multiple relative to peers. KMT offers the most striking earnings turnaround and the lowest headline valuation, but its results are heavily influenced by tungsten price timing, and its negative free cash flow highlights working-capital strain. In sector terms, all three are sensitive to macroeconomic and tariff dynamics, but NDSN's mix leans more toward secular technology demand, while GTES and KMT remain more exposed to the traditional industrial cycle.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings momentum, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor NDSN among these three. Its combination of record results, a rising backlog, recurring revenue, and exposure to structurally growing semiconductor and medical markets presents the most consistent upward trend profile. GTES ranks as a credible second candidate given its improving demand and data-center catalyst, while KMT's earnings quality concerns and cash-flow pressure introduce greater variability. This assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive and reflects current market conditions, not a guarantee of future performance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
GTES's RSI Oscillator leaves overbought zone
The 10-day RSI Oscillator for GTES moved out of overbought territory on October 07, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 33 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 25 of the 33 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 76%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GTES as a result. In 68 of 95 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for GTES turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 33 of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 73%.
GTES moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for GTES crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GTES declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
GTES broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 41 of 59 cases where GTES's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Following a +3.01% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GTES advanced for three days, in 204 of 331 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 135 of 241 cases where GTES Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 56%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 46 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.803) is normal, around the industry mean (3.865). P/E Ratio (17.538) is within average values for comparable stocks, (37.294). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.100) is also within normal values, averaging (1.879). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.032) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.875) is also within normal values, averaging (186.943).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. GTES’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
KMT in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026
KMT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 27 of 37 cases where KMT's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
The 10-day moving average for KMT crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 05, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
Following a +2.48% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where KMT advanced for three days, in 195 of 310 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 113 of 179 cases where KMT Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 63%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for KMT moved out of overbought territory on October 07, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 31 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 19 of the 31 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 61%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on KMT as a result. In 60 of 92 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for KMT turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 52 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 71%.
KMT moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where KMT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 41 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.434) is normal, around the industry mean (3.109). KMT has a moderately low P/E Ratio (6.561) as compared to the industry average of (21.777). KMT's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.050) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.020). Dividend Yield (0.027) settles around the average of (0.018) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.976) is also within normal values, averaging (2.217).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. KMT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. KMT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 71, placing this stock worse than average.
NDSN in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026
NDSN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 25 of 37 cases where NDSN's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 32 of 55 cases where NDSN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
Following a +2.37% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NDSN advanced for three days, in 164 of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 146 of 257 cases where NDSN Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 57%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for NDSN moved out of overbought territory on October 07, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 33 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 15 of the 33 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 45%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on NDSN as a result. In 36 of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 43%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NDSN turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 52 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 58%.
NDSN moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NDSN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 44%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 30 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NDSN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 82 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.433) is normal, around the industry mean (3.865). P/E Ratio (32.076) is within average values for comparable stocks, (37.294). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.888) is also within normal values, averaging (1.879). Dividend Yield (0.012) settles around the average of (0.032) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.828) is also within normal values, averaging (186.943).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
GTES | KMT | NDSN | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 88 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | 41 Fair valued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 100 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 40 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 59 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 94 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMT's Valuation (41) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTES (46) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NDSN (82). This means that KMT's stock grew similarly to GTES’s and somewhat faster than NDSN’s over the last 12 months.
GTES's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NDSN (52) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KMT (100). This means that GTES's stock grew similarly to NDSN’s and somewhat faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.
KMT's SMR Rating (40) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as NDSN (50) and is in the same range as GTES (68). This means that KMT's stock grew similarly to NDSN’s and similarly to GTES’s over the last 12 months.
NDSN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as KMT (59) and is in the same range as GTES (69). This means that NDSN's stock grew similarly to KMT’s and similarly to GTES’s over the last 12 months.
NDSN's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTES (88) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KMT (94). This means that NDSN's stock grew somewhat faster than GTES’s and somewhat faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.
| GTES | KMT | NDSN | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 19 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% | 17 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 57% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GTES’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while KMT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and NDSN’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- GTES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KMT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NDSN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GTES’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and NDSN’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GTES’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- KMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NDSN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GTES (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -2.90% price change this week, while KMT (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -4.32% , and NDSN (@Industrial Machinery) price fluctuated -1.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -5.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -17.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -22.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
GTES is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
KMT is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
NDSN is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-5.73% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (-2.00% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TWN | 91.31 | 0.44 | +0.48% |
| Taiwan Fund | |||
| IDV | 42.36 | 0.04 | +0.09% |
| iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) | |||
| TBLU | 51.12 | N/A | N/A |
| Tortoise Global Water ETF (TBLU) | |||
| STAX | 25.05 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| Nomura Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX) | |||
| IBCB | 23.98 | -0.09 | -0.37% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2036 Term Corporate ETF (IBCB) | |||
GTES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTES has been loosely correlated with NPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTES jumps, then NPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTES | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| NPO - GTES | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| LECO - GTES | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| ATMU - GTES | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| SPXC - GTES | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SWK - GTES | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||
KMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMT has been closely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMT jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMT | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| HLIO - KMT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| MIDD - KMT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| TNC - KMT | 68% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| SXI - KMT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| WTS - KMT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||