Advertisement
HPQ or LOGI or NTAP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? HP Inc. (HPQ) vs. Logitech International (LOGI) vs. NetApp (NTAP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- NTAP has delivered the strongest recent momentum with a year-to-date return exceeding 31%, outpacing both HPQ and LOGI.
- HPQ reported fiscal first-quarter revenue growth of 6.9% but faces ongoing pressure from elevated memory costs and mixed analyst sentiment.
- LOGI posted solid full-year fiscal 2026 sales growth of 6% in U.S. dollars, supported by steady demand for its peripherals and accessories.
- Recent market activity shows notable price gains for both HPQ and NTAP on May 22, while LOGI has exhibited more measured performance year-to-date.
- Sector exposure differs markedly: HPQ and LOGI tie closely to consumer and commercial computing, whereas NTAP benefits from enterprise data storage and AI infrastructure demand.
- Valuation and growth profiles present clear trade-offs, with NTAP showing higher relative returns amid technology sector rotation.
Introduction
HP Inc. (HPQ), Logitech International (LOGI), and NetApp (NTAP) represent distinct segments within the broader technology hardware and infrastructure space. This comparison examines their relative performance, business drivers, and market positioning in the current environment. Institutional investors, active traders, and portfolio managers seeking exposure to computing, peripherals, and data management may find the analysis relevant for assessing sector rotation and company-specific catalysts. The review draws on verifiable financial metrics and recent developments to highlight contrasts in momentum and risk profiles.
HPQ Overview and Recent Performance
HP Inc. designs and markets personal computers, printers, and related solutions for consumers and enterprises. In recent weeks, the stock has shown volatility amid earnings results and cost pressures. Fiscal first-quarter 2026 revenue reached $14.4 billion, reflecting a 6.9% increase year-over-year, with non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.81 exceeding consensus estimates. Elevated memory component costs have weighed on margins, prompting earlier guidance adjustments and workforce reductions. Recent market activity included a sharp single-day advance on May 22 amid broader technology sentiment. Year-to-date returns stand at approximately 15%, with the share price trading between a 52-week low near $17.56 and a high of $29.55.
LOGI Overview and Recent Performance
Logitech International develops computer peripherals, including mice, keyboards, webcams, and audio devices, serving both consumer and professional markets. The company reported fiscal fourth-quarter and full-year 2026 results in early May, with net sales of $1.09 billion for the quarter, up 7% in U.S. dollars, and full-year sales of $4.8 billion, representing 6% growth in U.S. dollars. Performance has remained steady, supported by consistent demand for hybrid-work accessories. Year-to-date returns approximate 3%, lagging broader market indices, while the one-year return reaches nearly 24%. The stock has displayed lower volatility compared with peers during the recent period, reflecting its more defensive positioning within consumer technology.
NTAP Overview and Recent Performance
NetApp provides enterprise data management and storage solutions, with growing emphasis on cloud and artificial intelligence workloads. The company has reported consistent earnings beats in recent quarters, including third-quarter fiscal 2026 results that exceeded estimates. Year-to-date returns surpass 31%, with notable strength in the most recent trading sessions, including a gain exceeding 12% on May 22. One-year returns stand at approximately 42%. Business momentum stems from demand for all-flash arrays and public-cloud integrations. The stock trades near the upper end of its 52-week range, underscoring relative outperformance versus the S&P 500 benchmark during the period.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated section highlighting its most relevant AI trading bots for prevailing market conditions. While hundreds of AI trading bots are available across thousands of tickers, only those demonstrating strong alignment with current trends, risk parameters, and performance statistics appear in the Trending AI Robots listing. Available bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, and strategies, with performance metrics varying by model. Traders can review detailed statistics including win rates, drawdowns, and ticker coverage directly on the platform. For further details, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models diverge significantly across the three companies. HP Inc. and Logitech International focus primarily on hardware for end users, exposing them to cyclical consumer and commercial spending patterns. NetApp concentrates on enterprise storage infrastructure, benefiting from sustained capital expenditures in data centers and AI applications. Recent momentum favors NTAP, which recorded the highest year-to-date and one-year returns among the group. HPQ faces headwinds from input-cost inflation, while LOGI maintains steadier but lower growth. Risk factors include supply-chain sensitivity for HPQ and LOGI versus execution risk on large enterprise contracts for NTAP. Valuation sensitivity appears higher for NTAP given its growth premium, whereas HPQ trades at a lower multiple amid margin concerns. Market sentiment has shifted positively toward infrastructure names like NTAP in recent weeks.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings delivery, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign higher probability weight to NTAP. The stock’s sustained outperformance, supported by AI-related demand drivers and recent price strength, distinguishes it within the peer set. HPQ and LOGI show more mixed signals tied to cost pressures and steadier but modest growth. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of available data rather than certainty.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HPQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOGI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and NTAP’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).
- HPQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LOGI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NTAP’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HPQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOGI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and NTAP’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HPQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LOGI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NTAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HPQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -5.40% price change this week, while LOGI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -7.34% , and NTAP (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated -4.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -11.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.88%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -6.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
HPQ is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.
LOGI is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.
NTAP is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-11.67% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
@Computer Communications (-6.75% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| HPQ | LOGI | NTAP | |
| Capitalization | 23.4B | 16.6B | 33B |
| EBITDA | 4.1B | 840M | 1.79B |
| Gain YTD | 16.674 | 12.682 | 57.545 |
| P/E Ratio | 9.47 | 23.53 | 26.31 |
| Revenue | 56.2B | 4.77B | 6.71B |
| Total Cash | 3.15B | 1.82B | 3.01B |
| Total Debt | 10.9B | 92M | 2.73B |
HPQ | LOGI | NTAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 81 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 31 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 42 | 4 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 37 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LOGI's Valuation (50) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as NTAP (77) in the Computer Peripherals industry, and is in the same range as HPQ (81) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that LOGI's stock grew similarly to NTAP’s and similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Computer Peripherals industry is significantly better than the same rating for LOGI (95) in the Computer Peripherals industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for HPQ (100) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP's stock grew significantly faster than LOGI’s and significantly faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's SMR Rating (11) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as LOGI (31) in the Computer Peripherals industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HPQ (45) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP's stock grew similarly to LOGI’s and somewhat faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as HPQ (16) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for LOGI (42) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that NTAP's stock grew similarly to HPQ’s and somewhat faster than LOGI’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as LOGI (37) in the Computer Peripherals industry, and is in the same range as HPQ (51) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP's stock grew similarly to LOGI’s and similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
| HPQ | LOGI | NTAP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
HPQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HPQ has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HPQ jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HPQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPQ | 100% | -2.74% | ||
| NTAP - HPQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.61% | ||
| DELL - HPQ | 57% Loosely correlated | -6.55% | ||
| LOGI - HPQ | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.85% | ||
| CRSR - HPQ | 39% Loosely correlated | -9.27% | ||
| SSYS - HPQ | 33% Poorly correlated | -7.48% | ||
More | ||||
LOGI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOGI has been closely correlated with HPQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOGI jumps, then HPQ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LOGI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOGI | 100% | -4.85% | ||
| HPQ - LOGI | 66% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| NTAP - LOGI | 55% Loosely correlated | -6.61% | ||
| DELL - LOGI | 49% Loosely correlated | -6.55% | ||
| CRSR - LOGI | 35% Loosely correlated | -9.27% | ||
| SSYS - LOGI | 34% Loosely correlated | -7.48% | ||
More | ||||