Advertisement
IBM vs LNT
Notable companies
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IBM is a StrongBuy and LNT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
IBM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLNT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- IBM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- LNT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IBM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- IBM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LNT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
IBM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +0.58% price change this week, while LNT (@Electric Utilities) price change was -2.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +7.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.51%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
IBM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
LNT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (+7.36% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
@Electric Utilities (-0.63% weekly)Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| IBM | LNT | IBM / LNT | |
| Capitalization | 227B | 16.7B | 1,359% |
| EBITDA | 12.9B | 1.96B | 657% |
| Gain YTD | 13.002 | 12.778 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.27 | 20.08 | 196% |
| Revenue | 64B | 4.14B | 1,544% |
| Total Cash | 15.4B | 329M | 4,681% |
| Total Debt | 67.7B | 11.3B | 599% |
IBM | LNT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IBM's Valuation (9) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNT (61) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that IBM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNT’s over the last 12 months.
IBM's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LNT (36) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that IBM’s stock grew similarly to LNT’s over the last 12 months.
IBM's SMR Rating (41) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LNT (63) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that IBM’s stock grew similarly to LNT’s over the last 12 months.
LNT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as IBM (59) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LNT’s stock grew similarly to IBM’s over the last 12 months.
IBM's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNT (70) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that IBM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNT’s over the last 12 months.
| IBM | LNT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 41% | 5 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 51% | 5 days ago 37% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 43% | 5 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 14 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 45% | 8 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 28% | 5 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MMD | 14.66 | 0.07 | +0.48% |
| NYLI MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund | |||
| GLOV | 56.40 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF | |||
| PCM | 6.35 | -0.01 | -0.16% |
| PCM Fund | |||
| MSLC | 53.08 | -0.24 | -0.45% |
| Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Eq ETF | |||
| BETE | 84.39 | -2.81 | -3.22% |
| ProShares Bitcoin & Eth Eq Wgh ETF | |||
IBM and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBM has been loosely correlated with ACN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBM jumps, then ACN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | 100% | -0.91% | ||
| ACN - IBM | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| CTSH - IBM | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| GIB - IBM | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| INFY - IBM | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| CDW - IBM | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||
LNT and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNT has been closely correlated with AEE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNT jumps, then AEE could also see price increases.