PBW
Price
$37.69
Change
-$1.56 (-3.97%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
586.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCLN
Price
$57.17
Change
-$2.97 (-4.94%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
849.07M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XT
Price
$78.36
Change
-$2.08 (-2.59%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBW or QCLN or XT

Header iconPBW vs QCLN vs XT Comparison
Open Charts PBW vs QCLN vs XTBanner chart's image
PBW vs QCLN vs XT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) vs. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) vs. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT)

Key Takeaways

  • PBW, QCLN, and XT provide exposure to clean energy and technology themes but differ markedly in scope, with PBW and QCLN focused on clean energy while XT spans broader exponential technologies including artificial intelligence, robotics, and biotechnology.
  • XT offers the lowest expense ratio at 0.46%, compared with 0.59% for QCLN and 0.64% for PBW, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • XT maintains the broadest diversification with approximately 200 holdings and global exposure, while QCLN is the most concentrated at roughly 53 holdings and PBW sits in between at around 69 holdings.
  • PBW and QCLN target U.S.-listed clean energy companies with thematic tilts toward renewables and storage, whereas XT follows a rules-based approach to companies producing or utilizing disruptive technologies across multiple sectors.
  • Structural differences in indexing methodology lead to varying risk profiles, with XT exhibiting lower concentration risk due to its wider mandate and PBW and QCLN showing greater sensitivity to clean energy policy and commodity cycles.
  • Relative positioning favors XT for investors seeking diversified technology exposure at lower cost, while PBW and QCLN suit those with a specific clean energy focus.

Introduction

PBW, QCLN, and XT represent distinct approaches to thematic investing in clean energy and emerging technologies. PBW and QCLN compete directly within the clean energy sector by tracking specialized indexes of companies involved in renewable power, energy storage, and related technologies. XT diverges by pursuing a wider mandate centered on exponential technologies that span information technology, healthcare, and industrials. These structural variations create tiered risk exposures and strategic options for investors evaluating sector exposure, diversification depth, and cost efficiency in the current market environment.

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) Overview

The Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) tracks the WilderHill Clean Energy Index, which selects U.S.-listed companies engaged in clean energy activities such as renewable electricity generation, energy storage, and power delivery. The fund holds approximately 69 securities and employs a modified equal-weight methodology with quarterly rebalancing and reconstitution. Sector allocation emphasizes industrials, information technology, and materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.64%. Distinguishing features include its thematic purity within clean energy and focus on innovation-driven companies rather than broad market capitalization weighting.

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) Overview

The First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) tracks the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index, comprising U.S.-listed firms that manufacture, develop, distribute, or install clean energy technologies including solar, wind, advanced batteries, and electric vehicles. The fund typically holds about 53 securities with a market-capitalization weighting approach. Top holdings often include companies in semiconductors and renewable equipment. Sector allocation leans heavily toward technology and industrials. The expense ratio is 0.59%. Key features encompass its concentrated exposure to green energy subsectors and rules-based selection of companies advancing clean technology adoption.

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) Overview

The iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) tracks an index of global companies that produce or utilize exponential technologies with potential to disrupt existing markets, spanning artificial intelligence, robotics, biotechnology, and advanced materials. The fund holds approximately 200 securities with market-capitalization weighting and annual or as-needed rebalancing. Sector allocation features significant weight in information technology and healthcare. The expense ratio is 0.46%. Distinguishing characteristics include its global reach across developed and emerging markets and broader thematic scope beyond pure clean energy.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The clean energy and exponential technology sectors operate amid shifting capital flows driven by policy incentives, technological advancements, and macroeconomic factors including interest rates and supply chain dynamics. Regulatory support for renewables and decarbonization continues to influence investment in solar, wind, and battery storage. Geopolitical considerations around energy security and critical minerals add complexity. Earnings trends among major holdings reflect demand for semiconductors, electric vehicles, and data infrastructure. Broader risks encompass commodity price volatility, evolving subsidy frameworks, and competition from traditional energy sources. These external drivers affect capital allocation across thematic ETFs without regard to individual fund structures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, structural differences have contributed to varying behavior among the three ETFs. PBW and QCLN have displayed higher sensitivity to clean energy policy announcements and commodity price movements due to their concentrated mandates. XT has shown relatively smoother trends owing to its diversified holdings across multiple exponential technology themes and global footprint. Concentration risk remains elevated in QCLN given fewer holdings, while PBW offers moderate breadth within its clean energy focus. XT's lower expense ratio and wider diversification support more stable positioning during periods of sector rotation. Performance differentials arise primarily from exposure profiles rather than short-term market events.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor the iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) with moderate probability based on its structural advantages, including the lowest expense ratio among the three, broadest diversification across approximately 200 holdings, and global exposure to multiple exponential technology themes. These attributes support superior risk-adjusted positioning relative to the more concentrated clean energy mandates of PBW and QCLN.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XT has more net assets: 3.88B vs. QCLN (849M) and PBW (586M). QCLN has a higher annual dividend yield than PBW and XT: QCLN (34.885) vs PBW (28.650) and XT (15.343). PBW was incepted earlier than QCLN and XT: PBW (21 years) vs QCLN (19 years) and XT (11 years). XT (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than QCLN (0.59) and PBW (0.64). PBW has a higher turnover XT (43.00) and QCLN (23.00) vs XT (43.00) and QCLN (23.00).
PBWQCLNXT
Gain YTD28.65034.88515.343
Net Assets586M849M3.88B
Total Expense Ratio0.640.590.46
Turnover62.0023.0043.00
Yield0.600.150.79
Fund Existence21 years19 years11 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBWQCLNXT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UTEN42.940.13
+0.31%
F/m US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF
RJMI25.670.03
+0.14%
RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF
SPIT31.860.03
+0.10%
F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF
AJAN28.30-0.03
-0.09%
Innovator Equity DefinedPrtETF-2YTJa2028
IYE60.79-0.97
-1.57%
iShares US Energy ETF

PBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBW has been closely correlated with ENVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBW jumps, then ENVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBW
1D Price
Change %
PBW100%
-4.10%
ENVX - PBW
67%
Closely correlated
-7.79%
BLDP - PBW
67%
Closely correlated
-8.24%
QS - PBW
66%
Loosely correlated
-4.44%
ACHR - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-7.16%
SLDP - PBW
65%
Loosely correlated
-5.58%
More

QCLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with BE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then BE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCLN
1D Price
Change %
QCLN100%
-2.26%
BE - QCLN
66%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
AEIS - QCLN
66%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
ENS - QCLN
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
ON - QCLN
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.23%
ALGM - QCLN
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.24%
More