PHYS
Price
$32.86
Change
+$0.19 (+0.58%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
14.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLV
Price
$58.12
Change
+$0.62 (+1.08%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
31.43B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPPP
Price
$14.47
Change
+$0.16 (+1.12%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
111.58M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PHYS or SLV or SPPP

PHYS vs SLV vs SPPP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) vs. iShares Silver Trust (SLV) vs. Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP)

Key Takeaways

  • Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS), iShares Silver Trust (SLV), and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) are all physically backed closed-end trusts providing direct exposure to specific precious metals rather than equity or futures-based strategies.
  • PHYS offers the lowest expense ratio at approximately 0.39% among the three, focusing exclusively on allocated physical gold with a single primary holding.
  • SLV tracks physical silver with a 0.50% expense ratio and maintains the largest assets under management, delivering high liquidity for investors seeking silver exposure.
  • SPPP provides a blended allocation to physical platinum (approximately 64%) and palladium (approximately 36%) but carries a higher management expense ratio near 0.78%.
  • Structural differences center on metal-specific demand drivers: gold for monetary and safe-haven roles, silver for industrial and investment uses, and platinum-group metals for automotive catalytic converters and industrial applications.
  • Relative positioning favors lower-cost, concentrated physical gold exposure for stability, while silver and platinum-palladium blends introduce greater volatility tied to industrial cycles.

Introduction

These three physically backed trusts allow investors to compare distinct precious-metals exposures without equity or derivative overlays. PHYS, SLV, and SPPP do not track the same index; instead, each holds allocated bullion of a different metal or metals combination, representing tiered approaches to the same broad theme of precious-metals ownership. The comparison highlights variations in cost structure, metal allocation, and sensitivity to macroeconomic and industrial factors in the current environment of shifting inflation expectations and supply-chain dynamics.

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) Overview

Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) is a closed-end trust whose investment objective is to hold substantially all assets in long-term, unencumbered, fully allocated physical gold bullion. The trust maintains one primary holding—London Good Delivery gold bars—representing nearly 100% of net assets, with minimal cash. It charges a management expense ratio of approximately 0.39%. PHYS operates as a passive physical vehicle with no active rebalancing or derivatives, emphasizing secure storage at the Royal Canadian Mint and redeemability for large unitholders. The structure avoids futures roll costs and provides transparent daily bar lists.

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) Overview

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) seeks to reflect the performance of the price of physical silver bullion before expenses. The trust holds allocated silver in a single primary position, accounting for essentially 100% of assets. SLV maintains an expense ratio of 0.50% and functions as a passive grantor trust sponsored by BlackRock. Custody is provided through established vaults with published bar lists. The vehicle offers high trading volume and tight spreads due to its scale, while remaining fully backed by physical metal without leverage or futures exposure.

Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) Overview

Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) is a closed-end trust that invests in unencumbered, fully allocated physical platinum and palladium bullion. As of recent reports, the portfolio allocates approximately 64% to platinum and 36% to palladium, with cash comprising a small remainder. The trust reports a management expense ratio around 0.78%. SPPP follows a passive physical strategy with storage at the Royal Canadian Mint and no derivatives or active trading. Its blended exposure differentiates it from single-metal vehicles while maintaining full allocation transparency.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The precious-metals sector encompasses monetary demand for gold alongside industrial consumption for silver and platinum-group metals. Capital flows respond to inflation hedging, central-bank purchases, and geopolitical uncertainty. Regulatory developments around mining emissions and automotive emissions standards influence platinum and palladium demand, while silver benefits from solar-panel and electronics growth. Macro drivers include real interest rates, U.S. dollar strength, and supply disruptions from major producing regions. These external factors create differentiated risk profiles across the metals without altering the core physical-trust structures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, PHYS has exhibited lower volatility consistent with gold’s safe-haven characteristics and concentrated monetary exposure. SLV has shown greater price swings linked to silver’s dual industrial and investment demand, often amplifying moves in both directions. SPPP has displayed higher sensitivity to automotive production trends and palladium supply dynamics, resulting in more pronounced drawdowns during industrial slowdowns. Performance differences arise from the distinct demand profiles and the trusts’ single-metal versus blended-metal constructions, with cost variations further influencing net returns over longer periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on vehicles like PHYS, SLV, and SPPP may find the platform useful for refining their screening criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural attributes, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probability of favor to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). The combination of the lowest expense ratio, single-metal focus on gold’s historically stable monetary demand, full physical allocation, and lower concentration risk relative to industrial metals supports a more consistent risk-adjusted profile across varying market regimes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLV has more net assets: 31.4B vs. PHYS (14.7B) and SPPP (112M). PHYS has a higher annual dividend yield than SLV and SPPP: PHYS (-0.485) vs SLV (-9.780) and SPPP (-14.074). PHYS was incepted earlier than SLV and SPPP: PHYS (17 years) vs SLV (20 years) and SPPP (14 years).
PHYSSLVSPPP
Gain YTD-0.485-9.780-14.074
Net Assets14.7B31.4B112M
Total Expense RatioN/A0.50N/A
Turnover2.24N/A0.08
Yield0.000.000.00
Fund Existence17 years20 years14 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PHYSSLVSPPP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
PHYS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPPP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMFL69.800.59
+0.85%
Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF
PBSE31.210.07
+0.22%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Sep
NNY7.940.01
+0.13%
Nuveen New York Municipal Value Fund
TMDV53.62N/A
N/A
ProShares Russell US Dividend Grwr ETF
TOTR38.98N/A
-0.01%
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF