ROM
Price
$145.64
Change
-$13.00 (-8.19%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
1.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPUU
Price
$208.24
Change
-$6.23 (-2.90%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
253.73M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TQQQ
Price
$74.44
Change
-$8.14 (-9.86%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
39.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ROM or SPUU or TQQQ

ROM vs SPUU vs TQQQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) vs. Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) vs. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ)

Key Takeaways

  • ROM, SPUU, and TQQQ are all leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that seek daily multiples of underlying index returns, making them structurally distinct from unleveraged equity ETFs.
  • ROM delivers 2x daily exposure to the technology sector via the S&P Technology Select Sector Index, offering concentrated thematic leverage with an expense ratio of 0.95%.
  • SPUU provides 2x daily exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index, emphasizing diversification across large-cap U.S. equities with the lowest net expense ratio of 0.60% among the three.
  • TQQQ targets 3x daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index, combining higher leverage with heavy technology and growth-stock concentration and a net expense ratio of 0.82%.
  • Structural differences in leverage levels, index focus, and expense ratios create varying risk profiles, with SPUU offering broader market exposure and ROM and TQQQ emphasizing technology-driven volatility.
  • These ETFs suit short-term tactical strategies rather than long-term core holdings due to daily reset mechanics and potential compounding effects in volatile markets.

Introduction

ROM, SPUU, and TQQQ represent distinct approaches to leveraged equity exposure within the U.S. market. While each employs derivatives to amplify daily index returns, they differ in leverage magnitude, sector breadth, and underlying benchmarks. ROM focuses narrowly on technology, SPUU spans the broad large-cap market, and TQQQ concentrates on high-growth Nasdaq-100 constituents. Investors comparing these ETFs often evaluate them for tactical allocation in technology-heavy or market-uptrend environments, where relative positioning hinges on risk tolerance, cost efficiency, and desired exposure depth.

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) Overview

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. The fund maintains approximately 72 to 87 holdings, primarily through swaps and other derivatives rather than direct equity positions. Top exposures include NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), and other leading technology names, with technology comprising over 99% of sector allocation. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a passively managed leveraged product, ROM resets daily to maintain its target multiple and features high liquidity for short-term trading.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) Overview

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) aims for daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the S&P 500 Index performance. It holds around 500 underlying components via derivatives, with top exposures mirroring S&P 500 leaders such as NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT). Sector allocation reflects the broad market, with technology around 33-36%, followed by financial services, communication services, and consumer cyclical. The net expense ratio is 0.60%. This passively managed fund rebalances daily and emphasizes liquidity for institutional and retail tactical use.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund utilizes swaps and derivatives, with effective holdings concentrated in Nasdaq-100 components; top exposures feature NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), and Tesla Inc. (TSLA). Technology accounts for roughly 54% of allocation, with notable weights in communication services and consumer cyclical sectors. The net expense ratio is 0.82%. TQQQ resets daily and maintains strong trading volume suitable for active strategies.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology sector continues to drive market dynamics amid artificial intelligence advancements, semiconductor demand, and digital infrastructure growth. Capital flows favor innovation leaders within the Nasdaq-100 and S&P Technology Select Sector, while broader S&P 500 exposure provides ballast through diversified large-cap earnings. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate paths, regulatory scrutiny on big tech, and global supply chain resilience influence sector performance. Earnings trends among dominant holdings remain robust in recent market cycles, though geopolitical tensions and valuation compression present ongoing risks across all three ETFs' underlying themes.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months and market cycles, the higher leverage in TQQQ has amplified both gains and drawdowns relative to the 2x products, particularly during technology-driven rallies and volatility spikes. ROM's sector concentration produces sharper swings tied to tech-specific catalysts compared with SPUU's broader market sensitivity. SPUU generally exhibits lower volatility than ROM or TQQQ due to its diversified S&P 500 base, while TQQQ's 3x multiple heightens sensitivity to Nasdaq-100 momentum. Performance differentials arise primarily from leverage levels and index composition rather than short-term price action, with all three demonstrating consistent tracking of their daily targets amid varying macro conditions.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover data-driven insights across leveraged and thematic ETFs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) presents a probabilistically favorable profile for balanced risk-adjusted positioning. Its lower net expense ratio, broader diversification across the S&P 500 Index, and moderate 2x leverage offer greater stability relative to the sector-concentrated ROM and higher-leverage TQQQ, particularly in environments emphasizing cost efficiency and reduced concentration risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 39B vs. ROM (1.37B) and SPUU (254M). ROM has a higher annual dividend yield than TQQQ and SPUU: ROM (54.486) vs TQQQ (41.431) and SPUU (13.492). ROM was incepted earlier than SPUU and TQQQ: ROM (19 years) vs SPUU (12 years) and TQQQ (16 years). SPUU (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than TQQQ (0.82) and ROM (0.95). ROM has a higher turnover SPUU (37.00) and TQQQ (25.00) vs SPUU (37.00) and TQQQ (25.00).
ROMSPUUTQQQ
Gain YTD54.48613.49241.431
Net Assets1.37B254M39B
Total Expense Ratio0.950.600.82
Turnover69.0037.0025.00
Yield0.141.330.37
Fund Existence19 years12 years16 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROMSPUUTQQQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ROM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPUU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNCJX24.65N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth I
JGYCX14.51N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield C
LAMPX27.05N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth P
LVFLX16.21N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R6
RICCX66.55-0.75
-1.11%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R3

ROM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROM has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROM jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROM
1D Price
Change %
ROM100%
-8.19%
NVDA - ROM
74%
Closely correlated
-4.13%
LRCX - ROM
73%
Closely correlated
-9.33%
AVGO - ROM
71%
Closely correlated
-3.06%
MU - ROM
70%
Closely correlated
-13.18%
KLAC - ROM
70%
Closely correlated
-9.17%
More