SHOC
Price
$105.80
Change
-$10.45 (-8.99%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
238.64M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$569.69
Change
-$57.84 (-9.22%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
65.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXX
Price
$539.77
Change
-$62.95 (-10.44%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
36.93B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHOC or SMH or SOXX

Header iconSHOC vs SMH vs SOXX Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SMH vs SOXXBanner chart's image
SHOC vs SMH vs SOXX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) vs. iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)

Key Takeaways

  • SHOC, SMH, and SOXX all provide targeted exposure to the U.S.-listed semiconductor sector but differ in index methodology, concentration levels, and costs, with SOXX offering the lowest expense ratio at 0.34%.
  • SMH and SHOC exhibit higher concentration risk, with top 10 holdings comprising over 70% of assets, while SOXX's modified market-cap weighting with caps provides relatively better diversification across 30 holdings.
  • SHOC stands out with its corporate governance focus, actively engaging on proxy voting to enhance long-term value in semiconductor firms.
  • All three ETFs maintain 100% technology sector allocation, primarily semiconductors, but SMH includes select foreign U.S.-listed firms like TSM for broader industry representation.
  • Recent market cycles highlight elevated volatility across the trio due to AI-driven demand, with SOXX showing slightly lower relative volatility thanks to its balanced weighting.
  • Liquidity is strongest in SMH and SOXX, supported by multi-billion AUM, positioning them for efficient trading compared to smaller SHOC.

Introduction

Comparing Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC), VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH), and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) is timely amid surging demand for semiconductors fueled by artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and digital transformation. These passive ETFs track distinct indexes focused on U.S.-listed semiconductor companies, offering investors varied strategic approaches to the sector. SHOC emphasizes U.S.-focused exposure with governance enhancements, SMH targets the 25 most liquid large-cap names including foreign listings, and SOXX provides broader coverage via a modified equal-weighted index of 30 firms. Structural differences in concentration, costs, and holdings influence risk profiles and suitability for portfolios seeking semiconductor growth in the current environment.

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) Overview

The Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Total Return Index, providing broad exposure to U.S.-listed semiconductor equities. It holds approximately 30-33 stocks, with top 10 holdings accounting for about 75% of assets, including NVDA (19.4%), AVGO (13.3%), and INTC (8.3%). Sector allocation is 100% technology, concentrated in semiconductors. The expense ratio is 0.40%. A distinguishing feature is Strive's proactive corporate governance approach, including proxy voting and engagement with company boards to prioritize operational excellence and shareholder value. The fund rebalances in line with its index methodology.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, focusing on the 25 largest and most liquid U.S.-listed semiconductor producers and equipment firms by market cap and trading volume. It holds 25-26 stocks, with top holdings like NVDA (~18%), TSM (~11%), AVGO (~8%), and INTC (~8%) comprising over 70% of the portfolio. Allocation is 100% to technology/semiconductors, including U.S.-listed foreign firms for comprehensive coverage. Expense ratio stands at 0.35%. The index favors industry leaders with global scope, enhancing representation of key players in production and equipment.

iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) Overview

The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) aims to replicate the NYSE Semiconductor Index, comprising 30 U.S.-listed semiconductor equities with modified market-cap weighting and individual caps to limit concentration. It features 30 holdings, with top 10 at ~60%, led by MU (9.8%), AMD (9.2%), INTC (7.4%), AVGO (7.3%), and NVDA (6.6%). Sector breakdown: 80.6% semiconductors, 19.3% equipment. The expense ratio is 0.34%. This structure promotes balanced exposure across the semiconductor value chain.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The semiconductor sector thrives amid explosive AI demand, with global sales projected to hit $975 billion in 2026, driven by generative AI chips nearing $500 billion in revenue. Capital flows heavily into AI infrastructure, boosting hyperscaler spending and earnings growth across chip designers, memory, and equipment makers. The U.S. CHIPS and Science Act fuels domestic fab investments exceeding $20 billion annually, enhancing supply chain resilience. Earnings trends remain robust, exemplified by TSMC's record results and upward capex revisions. Geopolitical tensions, particularly U.S.-China rivalry and Taiwan risks, underscore diversification needs, while regulatory shifts like eased export rules support growth but heighten supply chain scrutiny.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, SHOC, SMH, and SOXX have posted strong gains amid AI tailwinds, with year-to-date advances exceeding 50% for SMH and SOXX, and SHOC trailing slightly due to its smaller scale. SOXX has shown relative outperformance in recent weeks, benefiting from broader exposure and lower concentration, resulting in marginally reduced volatility compared to SMH's top-heavy tilt toward megacaps like NVDA and TSM. SHOC mirrors SMH's dynamics but with higher costs amplifying tracking differences. Drawdowns in volatile cycles highlight SMH and SHOC's sensitivity to leader stocks, while SOXX's caps mitigate extremes. Differences stem from weighting: market-cap for SMH/SHOC amplifies winners, versus SOXX's balanced approach for steadier trend consistency.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic sectors like semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SOXX with moderate conviction (65% probability edge over peers) due to its superior cost efficiency (0.34% expense ratio), balanced diversification via index caps reducing concentration risk, and stable momentum in recent market cycles. While SHOC's governance tilt and SMH's liquidity appeal in bull phases, SOXX's risk-adjusted positioning better suits ongoing volatility from geopolitical and macro factors.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 65.1B vs. SOXX (36.9B) and SHOC (239M). SOXX has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH and SHOC: SOXX (79.347) vs SMH (58.190) and SHOC (54.254). SHOC was incepted earlier than SMH and SOXX: SHOC (4 years) vs SMH (14 years) and SOXX (25 years). SOXX (0.34) and SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SOXX has a higher turnover SHOC (25.00) and SMH (12.00) vs SHOC (25.00) and SMH (12.00).
SHOCSMHSOXX
Gain YTD54.25458.19079.347
Net Assets239M65.1B36.9B
Total Expense Ratio0.400.350.34
Turnover25.0012.0027.00
Yield0.150.180.29
Fund Existence4 years14 years25 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHOCSMHSOXX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGTZ3.920.87
+28.52%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF
TWOX28.75N/A
N/A
iShares Large Cp Accelerated Outcome ETF
NUAG20.86-0.09
-0.43%
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggt Bd ETF
GJAN44.65-0.38
-0.85%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jan
SLYV103.95-1.74
-1.65%
State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Sm CpValETF

SHOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHOC
1D Price
Change %
SHOC100%
-8.99%
LRCX - SHOC
85%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
AMAT - SHOC
82%
Closely correlated
-9.71%
KLAC - SHOC
81%
Closely correlated
-9.47%
ASML - SHOC
78%
Closely correlated
-6.59%
MPWR - SHOC
75%
Closely correlated
-10.38%
More