Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc provider of early education and child care, family care solutions, and workforce education services that help working families and client employees personally and professionally... Show more
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TXBC | 16.02 | 0.29 | +1.84% |
| 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 ex-BTC Index ETF (TXBC) | |||
| JELH | 25.20 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| Janus Henderson Equity Linked High Income ETF (JELH) | |||
| GQI | 59.55 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) | |||
| SQS | 28.17 | N/A | N/A |
| Sapient Quality Select ETF | |||
| EXUS | 26.04 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| Nomura ETF Trust Nomura Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that BFAM and TNL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFAM and TNL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFAM | 100% | -1.97% | ||
| TNL - BFAM | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| ABNB - BFAM | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.43% | ||
| CCL - BFAM | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
| RCL - BFAM | 29% Poorly correlated | -2.46% | ||
| SABR - BFAM | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFAM | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| BFAM | 100% | -1.97% |
| Personnel Services industry (13 stocks) | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.26% |
| Commercial Services industry (90 stocks) | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.31% |
a provider of child care and educational services
Industry PersonnelServices
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where BFAM advanced for three days, in 197 of 307 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
BFAM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 135 of 221 cases where BFAM Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 61%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on BFAM as a result. In 56 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for BFAM turned negative on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 43 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 28 of the 43 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 65%.
BFAM moved below its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for BFAM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 16 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BFAM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. BFAM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 79 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.800) is normal, around the industry mean (7.903). P/E Ratio (17.079) is within average values for comparable stocks, (10.602). BFAM's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (10.200) is slightly higher than the industry average of (4.440). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.078) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.250) is also within normal values, averaging (1.645).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. BFAM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 85, placing this stock worse than average.