Bogota Financial Corp is a New Jersey-based bank... Show more
a holding company, which engages in business activities that are permissible for mutual holding companies under New Jersey and Federal law, which includes investing in loans and securities.
Industry RegionalBanks
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KNO | 63.15 | 0.96 | +1.54% |
| AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) | |||
| ATFV | 41.03 | 0.22 | +0.55% |
| Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) | |||
| EFFE | 28.01 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF | |||
| CBXO | 22.20 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) | |||
| TMSL | 41.04 | -0.23 | -0.56% |
| T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSBK has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSBK jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSBK | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| FHN - BSBK | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| COLB - BSBK | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| UBCP - BSBK | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.13% | ||
| WSFS - BSBK | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| WTFC - BSBK | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSBK | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| BSBK | 100% | -1.09% |
| Banks category (434 stocks) | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.48% |
| Regional Banks category (361 stocks) | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.42% |
The 10-day moving average for BSBK crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 24, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 9 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 21, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on BSBK as a result. In 56 of 150 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 37%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for BSBK turned negative on September 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 56 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 23 of the 56 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 41%.
BSBK moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BSBK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 41%.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +2.55% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BSBK advanced for three days, in 58 of 179 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 32%.
BSBK may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 54 of 163 cases where BSBK Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 33%.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. BSBK’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 85 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.820) is normal, around the industry mean (1.318). P/E Ratio (43.452) is within average values for comparable stocks, (24.325). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.050) is also within normal values, averaging (1.188). BSBK has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.030). BSBK's P/S Ratio (6.341) is slightly higher than the industry average of (3.749).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 99 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. BSBK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock worse than average.