A.I.dvisor tells us that FGL and IESC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGL and IESC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGL | 100% | +4.07% | ||
| IESC - FGL | 21% Poorly correlated | +30.27% | ||
| BWMN - FGL | 14% Poorly correlated | +3.87% | ||
| ACA - FGL | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ESOA - FGL | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| TPC - FGL | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGL | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| FGL | 100% | +4.07% |
| Industrial Services category (190 stocks) | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.17% |
| Engineering & Construction category (53 stocks) | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.34% |