Advertisement
FGL vs IESC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGL is a Hold and IESC is a Hold.
FGL's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FGL turned positive on September 30, 2026. Looking at past instances where FGL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 16 of 17 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +26.29% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FGL advanced for three days, in 52 of 68 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
FGL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FGL as a result. In 28 of 28 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FGL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for FGL entered a downward trend on October 01, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 14 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.007) is normal, around the industry mean (15.499). P/E Ratio (-0.102) is within average values for comparable stocks, (168.807). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.185) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.905).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 39 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FGL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 99 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FGL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock worse than average.
IESC in upward trend: price expected to rise as it breaks its lower Bollinger Band on October 14, 2026
IESC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 28 of 29 cases where IESC's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 8 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +0.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IESC advanced for three days, in 312 of 362 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IESC as a result. In 60 of 89 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IESC turned negative on October 07, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 27 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 55%.
IESC moved below its 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for IESC crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IESC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 23 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 59 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.670) is normal, around the industry mean (15.499). P/E Ratio (20.737) is within average values for comparable stocks, (168.807). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.310) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.185) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.292) is also within normal values, averaging (2.905).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. IESC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
FGL | IESC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FGL's Valuation (14) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IESC (59) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that FGL’s stock grew somewhat faster than IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGL (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGL’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's SMR Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGL (89) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that IESC’s stock grew significantly faster than FGL’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGL (97) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGL’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FGL (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to FGL’s over the last 12 months.
| FGL | IESC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 17 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while IESC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IESC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FGL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FGL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- IESC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FGL (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -31.15% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -11.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -6.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -29.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
IESC is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-6.76% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
FGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGL and IESC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGL and IESC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGL | 100% | +23.48% | ||
| IESC - FGL | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| BWMN - FGL | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ESOA - FGL | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| ACA - FGL | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| BLNK - FGL | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
IESC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IESC | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| FIX - IESC | 74% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| STRL - IESC | 66% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| ECG - IESC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| MYRG - IESC | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| GVA - IESC | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DIA | 527.70 | 3.34 | +0.64% |
| State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) | |||
| AESR | 19.70 | 0.12 | +0.61% |
| Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) | |||
| INFO | 28.42 | 0.17 | +0.60% |
| Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Large Cap Core ETF (INFO) | |||
| WDTE | 28.55 | 0.13 | +0.46% |
| Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF (WDTE) | |||
| TACU | 28.15 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF (TACU) | |||