Advertisement
FGL vs IESC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGL is a Hold and IESC is a StrongBuy.
FGL | IESC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 | 42 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FGL's Valuation (69) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as IESC (81) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that FGL’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGL (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that IESC’s stock grew significantly faster than FGL’s over the last 12 months.
FGL's SMR Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as IESC (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that FGL’s stock grew similarly to IESC’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGL (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that IESC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGL’s over the last 12 months.
IESC's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FGL (52) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that IESC’s stock grew similarly to FGL’s over the last 12 months.
| FGL | IESC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while IESC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FGL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IESC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FGL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FGL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IESC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FGL (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.13% price change this week, while IESC (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
IESC is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-0.98% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
FGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGL and IESC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGL and IESC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGL | 100% | +3.32% | ||
| IESC - FGL | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
| BWMN - FGL | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ACA - FGL | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| ESOA - FGL | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.70% | ||
| CDLR - FGL | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||
IESC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IESC has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IESC jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IESC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IESC | 100% | +2.83% | ||
| FIX - IESC | 74% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| STRL - IESC | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| ECG - IESC | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| MYRG - IESC | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| LGN - IESC | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.74% | ||
More | ||||