GDS Holdings started as an IT service provider in 2001, then moved to the data center business with its first self-developed data center opening in 2010... Show more
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSFY | 22.20 | 0.22 | +1.00% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft (MSFT) ETF (MSFY) | |||
| NBTR | 47.78 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| NDAA | 24.14 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA) | |||
| IOO | 145.95 | 0.02 | +0.01% |
| iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) | |||
| RVI | 25.15 | -0.14 | -0.55% |
| Robinhood Ventures Fund I | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDS has been closely correlated with VNET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDS jumps, then VNET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDS | 100% | -2.60% | ||
| VNET - GDS | 70% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| AI - GDS | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.45% | ||
| CD - GDS | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.69% | ||
| PONY - GDS | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| PSFE - GDS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDS | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| GDS | 100% | -2.60% |
| GDS (2 stocks) | 98% Closely correlated | -1.86% |
| Technology Services (396 stocks) | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.70% |
a company which offers computer data recovery and backup system
Industry InformationTechnologyServices
GDS saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on September 30, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 41 of the 47 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 87%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 01, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GDS as a result. In 72 of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
GDS moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for GDS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GDS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
The Aroon Indicator for GDS entered a downward trend on September 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where GDS's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 24 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 52 of 58 cases where GDS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +7.99% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GDS advanced for three days, in 220 of 281 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
GDS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 70 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. GDS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 87 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.455) is normal, around the industry mean (7.462). P/E Ratio (13.975) is within average values for comparable stocks, (67.645). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (7.334) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.010) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.795) is also within normal values, averaging (141.758).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. GDS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.