Leishen Energy Holding Co Ltd is a provider of clean-energy equipment and integrated solutions to the oil and gas industry, with a commitment to providing customers with high-performance, safe, and cost-effective energy solutions... Show more
Industry OilfieldServicesEquipment
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FAS | 141.04 | 0.53 | +0.38% |
| Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X ETF (FAS) | |||
| BSR | 30.56 | N/A | N/A |
| Beacon Unified Catalyst ETF (BSR) | |||
| OBOR | 27.57 | N/A | N/A |
| KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) | |||
| BAMV | 36.14 | -0.09 | -0.25% |
| Brookstone Value Stock ETF (BAMV) | |||
| FRA | 10.51 | -0.03 | -0.28% |
| Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSE and ACDC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSE and ACDC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSE | 100% | -5.39% | ||
| ACDC - LSE | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
| USAC - LSE | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
| KLXE - LSE | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.76% | ||
| LBRT - LSE | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| BKR - LSE | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSE | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| LSE | 100% | -5.39% |
| Oilfield Services/Equipment industry (46 stocks) | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.05% |
| Industrial Services industry (189 stocks) | -7% Poorly correlated | +0.84% |
The Stochastic Oscillator for LSE moved out of overbought territory on September 25, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 11 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 11 of the 11 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 24, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LSE as a result. In 38 of 45 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for LSE turned negative on September 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 20 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 16 of the 20 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 80%.
LSE moved below its 50-day moving average on September 25, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for LSE crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 4 of 6 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LSE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
The Aroon Indicator for LSE entered a downward trend on September 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Following a +10.00% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LSE advanced for three days, in 58 of 75 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
LSE may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. LSE’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.833) is normal, around the industry mean (3.496). LSE has a moderately high P/E Ratio (480.000) as compared to the industry average of (88.534). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.687). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.262) is also within normal values, averaging (1.663).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LSE’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 66, placing this stock worse than average.