GET DAILY SIGNALSFXD vs RSPD: Weighing Two Distinct Approaches to Consumer Discretionary Exposure
Key Takeaways
- FXD is a smart-beta fund tracking the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Index, using multi-factor selection and tiered equal weighting across roughly 119 holdings.
- RSPD is a pure equal-weight fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary Index, holding about 48 to 50 large-cap names with quarterly rebalancing.
- FXD leans into mid-cap and cross-sector exposure (communication services and industrials), while RSPD provides a nearly pure-play large-cap consumer discretionary basket.
- RSPD is the lower-cost option at a 0.40% expense ratio versus 0.60% for FXD, a meaningful structural advantage over time.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: RSPD is the preferred ticker of the two based on cost efficiency, disciplined equal weighting, and pure sector exposure.
Why This ETF Comparison Matters
Consumer discretionary remains one of the more economically sensitive areas of the equity market, so the choice of exposure vehicle can matter a great deal in a changing rate and spending backdrop. Both FXD and RSPD target U.S. consumer discretionary equities, yet they follow very different routes. This comparison shows how a smart-beta, multi-factor strategy stacks up against a straightforward equal-weight, large-cap approach. Looking at sector exposure, performance drivers, and positioning helps clarify which structure aligns better with individual objectives in the current cycle.
Breaking Down FXD
FXD seeks to track the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Index, which applies First Trust’s AlphaDEX stock-selection process to consumer discretionary names from the Russell 1000 Index. The methodology ranks stocks on a mix of growth and value factors before applying tiered equal weighting. The result is a diversified portfolio of roughly 119 holdings that carries a heavier mid-cap tilt than most large-cap sector funds. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock selection compares to peers in the space.
Top holdings have included names such as Dillard’s (DDS), Gap (GAP), SharkNinja (SN), Mattel (MAT), and Macy’s (M). Consumer discretionary accounts for about 75% of the portfolio, with additional exposure to communication services and industrials. The fund carries a 0.60% expense ratio and rebalances according to the index’s factor-driven rankings, setting it apart from simple market-cap-weighted sector products.
Understanding RSPD
RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary Index, which takes the consumer discretionary constituents of the S&P 500 and assigns each an equal weight, rebalancing quarterly. This produces a concentrated yet balanced portfolio of roughly 48 to 50 large-cap names, each weighted near 2% to 2.5%.
Representative holdings include Carnival (CCL), TJX Companies (TJX), Royal Caribbean (RCL), Marriott International (MAR), Ralph Lauren (RL), Amazon (AMZN), and Tesla (TSLA). The portfolio stays essentially a pure consumer discretionary play, with hotels, restaurants, and leisure as the largest industry group. The fund charges a 0.40% expense ratio, and its equal-weight design reduces the mega-cap concentration seen in cap-weighted alternatives.
The Broader Consumer Landscape
Both funds feel the effects of U.S. consumer health, which depends on employment, wage growth, inflation, and interest rates. Recent cycles have shown resilient labor markets supporting spending on travel, dining, and discretionary retail, while higher financing costs have weighed on big-ticket items such as autos and housing-related goods. Travel and leisure names appear prominently in RSPD, whereas FXD’s multi-factor tilt has brought more exposure to value-oriented retailers and select media and industrial names. Regulatory and tariff developments on imported consumer goods, along with inventory and promotional shifts in retail, continue to act as key variables for both funds.
How the Two Funds Compare in Performance and Positioning
Across recent market cycles, the funds have displayed noticeably different risk and return profiles despite sharing the same sector theme. RSPD’s large-cap, equal-weight structure tends to track the broader consumer discretionary complex with moderate volatility, while FXD’s mid-cap and factor tilts can amplify moves during style rotations. When value and smaller-cap names lead, FXD’s multi-factor screen has delivered a differentiated return stream; when large-cap, high-quality franchises outperform, RSPD’s simpler structure has generally held up better. Cost remains a factor: RSPD’s 0.40% expense ratio versus FXD’s 0.60% offers a recurring advantage, while FXD’s broader diversification across roughly 119 names reduces some single-stock risk relative to RSPD’s more concentrated 48-to-50-name portfolio.
My Experience with Tickeron’s AI Screener
I often rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener when comparing ETFs like these. The tool lets me quickly filter by industry, market cap, technical patterns, and performance metrics, which helps surface relative strengths and weaknesses far faster than manual review. It has become a regular part of how I evaluate sector exposure choices before making allocation decisions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
FXD's RSI Indicator peaks and leaves overbought zone
The 10-day RSI Oscillator for FXD moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 36 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 31 of the 36 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 86%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 5 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 50-day moving average for FXD moved below the 200-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FXD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
FXD broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FXD as a result. In 67 of 79 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
FXD moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for FXD crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 26, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +1.13% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FXD advanced for three days, in 237 of 294 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 196 of 254 cases where FXD Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 77%.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category ConsumerDiscretionary