A.I.dvisor tells us that SHFS and FBP have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHFS and FBP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHFS | 100% | +16.46% | ||
| FBP - SHFS | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
| WAL - SHFS | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.64% | ||
| OFG - SHFS | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
| TCBI - SHFS | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| COLB - SHFS | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHFS | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| SHFS | 100% | +16.46% |
| Banks category (435 stocks) | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.10% |
| Regional Banks category (362 stocks) | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.11% |