GET DAILY SIGNALSAVDV vs DISV: Weighing Two International Small-Cap Value ETFs
Key Takeaways
- AVDV and DISV are both actively managed international small-cap value exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that target cheap, smaller companies in developed markets outside the United States.
- AVDV is materially larger, with roughly four times the assets and a lower expense ratio, while DISV offers slightly broader diversification with more than 1,600 holdings.
- Both funds delivered strong double-digit returns over the past year, but AVDV has generally posted stronger recent momentum and risk-adjusted performance.
- Expense efficiency and liquidity favor AVDV; DISV carries a slightly higher fee of 0.42% versus AVDV's 0.36%.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: AVDV is the current favorite, reflecting stronger relative momentum, lower cost, and greater trading liquidity.
- For deeper context, explore AVDV Major News and AVDV Today's Price Move, as well as DISV Major News and DISV Today's Price Move.
- Discover which automated strategies are currently favored by the market by exploring Trending AI Robots.
Why These ETFs Are Drawing Attention Now
International small-cap value investing has drawn renewed attention as investors seek diversification beyond large-cap U.S. equities and exposure to attractively valued companies in developed markets. This comparison examines two leading ETFs in that category: the Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and the Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). Both funds pursue a similar style mandate, making them frequent substitutes in portfolio construction. Traders and long-term investors comparing relative performance, market positioning, cost efficiency, and momentum will find this analysis a useful starting point for evaluating which vehicle currently holds the edge. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the funds compare to others in the category.
AVDV Overview and Recent Performance
The Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) is an actively managed fund that invests at least 80% of its assets in small-capitalization, value-oriented companies across developed non-U.S. markets. Launched in 2019, it has grown into one of the largest products in its category, with assets approaching $20 billion and an expense ratio of approximately 0.36%. In recent weeks, AVDV has traded within a modest consolidation range after a strong earlier run, with its price holding comfortably above key long-term moving averages. Over the trailing year, the fund has delivered returns in the mid-20% to low-30% range, and its year-to-date performance has been robust. Sentiment has been supported by broad value-factor strength, favorable earnings trends among smaller foreign companies, and consistent fund inflows. Its size gives it strong liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads, which are notable advantages for active traders.
DISV Overview and Recent Performance
The Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) is an actively managed fund from Dimensional Fund Advisors that applies the firm's long-standing systematic approach to smaller, cheaper companies in developed international markets. It holds a highly diversified portfolio of more than 1,600 positions and charges an expense ratio of approximately 0.42%, with assets of roughly $5 billion. Like its peer, DISV has posted strong trailing returns, gaining in the mid-20% to low-30% range over the past year. Recent market activity has shown the fund trading in a comparatively steady pattern, with year-to-date performance somewhat below that of AVDV over certain stretches. Sentiment has been influenced by the same value and international-diversification tailwinds, though its smaller asset base and slightly higher fee mean it captures less of the scale-driven efficiency seen in larger rivals.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Although AVDV and DISV occupy the same style niche, they differ in meaningful ways. In terms of scale, AVDV is roughly four times larger, which generally translates to tighter spreads, lower transaction costs, and stronger institutional adoption. On cost, AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio is lower than DISV's 0.42%, a difference that compounds over long holding periods. Diversification and construction also differ. DISV holds a much larger number of positions, offering broader name-level diversification, while AVDV operates with a more concentrated but still diversified portfolio. Both share comparable sector and country exposures, with meaningful weight in financials, industrials, and materials across developed Europe and Asia. On recent momentum, AVDV has tended to lead, supported by stronger year-to-date relative performance and more consistent risk-adjusted returns, whereas DISV has offered steadier, lower-volatility behavior in certain windows. Risk factors, including currency fluctuation and value-factor cyclicality, affect both funds similarly. From what I see, the liquidity edge for AVDV stands out in active trading scenarios.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative momentum, cost efficiency, and trading liquidity, Tickeron's AI would currently lean toward AVDV. The fund's larger asset base, lower expense ratio, and generally stronger recent relative performance give it a modest edge in market positioning, while its sustained presence above long-term trend indicators suggests more stable directional momentum. That said, both funds remain closely correlated and expose investors to similar style and currency risks. The advantage for AVDV is best understood as a marginal, probability-based preference rather than a definitive outcome, and the balance could shift as relative value spreads and international market conditions evolve. I’m watching this closely as conditions shift.
Exploring AI Tools for ETF Research
In my own analysis, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Trend Prediction Engine to gauge momentum signals across similar international small-cap holdings. It helps surface patterns that complement traditional fundamental review without replacing it. This approach has become a regular part of how I cross-check relative strength between funds like these.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
Harry Richardson — Algorithmic Trader & Strategy Developer Harry is an algorithmic trader specializing in impulse and breakout trading strategies across cryptocurrency and equity markets. With more than 10 years of experience in developing automated trading systems, he focuses on building structured algorithms designed to capture momentum while maintaining strict risk control. His approach combines quantitative analysis, real-market execution, and continuous performance monitoring. Vitalii prioritizes risk management, drawdown control, and strategy stability over short-term optimization, ensuring algorithms are adaptable to changing market conditions. He has developed and tested hundreds of automated strategies, working extensively with live trading environments, forward testing, and portfolio-level algorithm management. His work centers on transforming trading ideas into fully operational, scalable automated systems.
AVDV's RSI Oscillator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for AVDV moved out of oversold territory on October 26, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 24 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 23 of the 24 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 47 of 54 cases where AVDV's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
Following a +1.90% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AVDV advanced for three days, in 294 of 346 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
AVDV may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on AVDV as a result. In 54 of 73 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.
AVDV moved below its 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for AVDV crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AVDV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for AVDV entered a downward trend on October 28, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category ForeignSmallMidValue
Advertisement