Blue Owl Capital is one of the largest alternative asset managers, operating across three core platforms: Credit, Real Assets, and GP Strategic Capital. Its third-quarter results carry outsized weight for investors because they arrive during a period of intense scrutiny on the private credit industry, which faced a wave of negative narratives earlier in 2026. Against that backdrop, the company's ability to sustain fundraising, grow assets under management (AUM, the total capital it oversees for clients), and expand fee-related earnings (FRE) serves as a key barometer of business durability. For shareholders, the report also validates whether distributable earnings (DE) — a measure of the cash the firm can return to investors — continue to outpace its dividend, a metric central to Blue Owl's identity as an income-focused asset manager. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Blue Owl reported third-quarter distributable earnings of $0.24 per share, exceeding the FactSet consensus estimate of $0.23 per share. Fee-related earnings came in at $0.27 per share, while fee-related revenue reached roughly $752.6 million, beating expectations of approximately $706 million. On a GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) basis, total revenue was about $806.5 million, up 11% from roughly $728 million a year earlier.
Assets under management rose 12% year over year to approximately $330 billion. The firm raised $12.6 billion of total capital during the quarter, bringing its trailing twelve-month total to about $49 billion, and posted a record quarter for institutional fundraising. Management highlighted that AUM not yet paying fees climbed to $36 billion, a figure expected to generate roughly $400 million of annual management fees once deployed. Blue Owl also declared a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per Class A share.
Blue Owl shares rose about 5% in premarket trading following the release, a signal that investors viewed the results as a meaningful beat. The most closely watched number — distributable earnings per share — came in above consensus, and the strength of fee-related revenue reinforced confidence in the firm's growth trajectory. Sentiment had been cautious heading into the report given broader concerns about private credit, but the record institutional fundraising quarter and a 12% year-over-year increase in AUM helped counter those worries. The results also showed improving momentum in the private wealth channel, where redemption requests continued to decline and inflows recovered sequentially, further supporting the constructive tone.
Looking ahead, management reaffirmed confidence that full-year 2026 fee-related earnings will exceed $1.02 per share and distributable earnings will exceed $0.89 per share. Investors will be watching whether the firm can sustain this momentum into the fourth quarter and beyond.
One key monitor is the pace at which undeployed capital converts into fee-paying AUM. Blue Owl holds $36 billion of AUM not yet earning fees, representing roughly $400 million of potential annual management fees. The speed of deployment will directly shape future management fee growth, which the company expects to accelerate in 2027.
Fundraising trends across the Credit and Real Assets platforms also remain important. Credit accounted for about 45% of trailing twelve-month fundraising, and the firm pointed to strong investor demand despite industry-wide concerns. Wealth channel flows will be another focal point, given earlier redemption pressures in certain non-traded products.
Finally, the interest-rate backdrop matters. Management noted that a higher-rate environment benefits its floating-rate direct lending book through increased net interest income. Investors will likely track how rate expectations evolve and how they influence both deal activity and portfolio performance across Blue Owl's strategies.
In my analysis of earnings movers like OWL, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter stocks by fundamentals, patterns, and AI signals. It helps surface comparable ideas across sectors without manual effort, and I find the customizable filters particularly useful for spotting trends in asset managers. This approach keeps my process efficient while staying focused on the data that matters most.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Aroon Indicator for OWL entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 183 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 142 of the 183 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 78%.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where OWL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
OWL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where OWL's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 32 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 26, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on OWL as a result. In 59 of 78 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for OWL just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where OWL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The 50-day moving average for OWL moved above the 200-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +3.96% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where OWL advanced for three days, in 224 of 298 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. OWL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.312) is normal, around the industry mean (2.397). P/E Ratio (80.583) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.450). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.146) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.095) settles around the average of (0.272) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.303) is also within normal values, averaging (15.798).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. OWL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 81, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry InvestmentManagers