Commerce Bancshares, a Missouri-based regional bank holding company, holds a closely watched spot in the Midwest banking sector. Its quarterly results provide investors with insight into regional lending demand, deposit trends, and fee-income patterns amid changing interest rates. The bank has earned a reputation for disciplined capital management and a diversified revenue stream that blends traditional lending with trust, card, and deposit fees. With the stock having lagged the broader market ahead of the report, attention focused on whether consistent profitability and balance-sheet expansion would support confidence in the franchise.
For the third quarter ended September 30, 2026, Commerce Bancshares reported GAAP earnings of $1.08 per share, modestly above the consensus estimate of approximately $1.07. This compared with EPS of $1.06 in the same period a year earlier. Total revenue reached $494.3 million, an 11.5% increase from $441.0 million in the prior-year quarter and roughly in line with analysts’ forecasts.
Net interest income, the bank’s largest revenue source, totaled $308.9 million, slightly below the consensus estimate of $312.7 million, though it still reflected 10.5% year-over-year growth. The net interest margin came in at 3.7%, in line with expectations. Management noted that the underlying margin expanded after excluding TIPS inflation income recognized in the prior quarter. The efficiency ratio improved to 56.7%, better than anticipated. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Chief Executive Officer John Kemper described the quarter as “another solid quarter,” citing strong profitability, broad-based loan growth, momentum across fee businesses, and excellent credit quality. Fee income increased, supported by trust, bank card, and deposit fees.
Commerce Bancshares shares were little changed immediately following the release, holding near $55, as investors weighed a modest EPS beat against a slight miss on net interest income and an in-line revenue performance. The relatively muted reaction reflected a quarter without dramatic surprises: profitability held up, loan growth remained healthy, and fee income continued to contribute. Some analysts characterized the results as “softer,” noting that net interest income came in slightly below expectations. Broader sentiment around regional banks has remained sensitive to interest-rate expectations, making the stability of the bank’s net interest margin a central theme for shareholders.
Looking ahead, investors will focus on whether Commerce Bancshares can sustain its loan-growth momentum and defend its net interest margin as the interest-rate environment evolves. The bank’s balanced revenue mix, spanning lending and fee-based businesses, remains a key source of stability, but the trajectory of deposit costs and loan yields will be critical.
Capital management will also stay in focus. The company repurchased roughly 1.9 million shares during the quarter while maintaining strong capital levels, signaling a commitment to returning capital to shareholders without compromising balance-sheet strength. Book value per share declined to $29.68 from $30.45, a move worth monitoring in the context of accumulated other comprehensive income and rate-driven mark-to-market adjustments on the securities portfolio.
Finally, credit quality remains a central watchpoint. Management pointed to excellent credit quality during the quarter, but investors will continue to track provisions for credit losses and any signs of stress in commercial real estate or consumer lending. Together, these factors will shape how the market evaluates Commerce Bancshares’ earnings power in the quarters ahead.
In my research workflow I occasionally turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly surface comparable regional banks and test how different filters affect the shortlist of candidates. The tool lets users apply customizable criteria around fundamentals, technical patterns, and performance metrics, which helps surface ideas more efficiently than manual review. I find it useful for cross-checking sector trends without replacing traditional analysis.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
CBSH may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 29 of 44 cases where CBSH's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CBSH's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 19 of 32 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CBSH as a result. In 43 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CBSH just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where CBSH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 23 of 42 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
Following a +2.33% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CBSH advanced for three days, in 151 of 301 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 45 of 75 cases where CBSH's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
CBSH moved below its 50-day moving average on September 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CBSH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.
The Aroon Indicator for CBSH entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 32 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CBSH’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CBSH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 78 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.829) is normal, around the industry mean (1.241). P/E Ratio (13.623) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.089). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.190) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.020) settles around the average of (0.036) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.272) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a regional bank
Industry RegionalBanks