Investors often look at the consumer discretionary and licensed-entertainment space by comparing FNKO and HAS. Both turn popular culture into physical products, yet they sit at very different scales and stages in their business cycles. Funko represents a turnaround focused on collectibles and margin repair. Hasbro is the more established player built around iconic game and entertainment franchises. This comparison looks at recent performance, market positioning, and the factors that could influence how a quantitative system might view the pair.
Funko, based in Everett, Washington, creates licensed pop-culture items such as vinyl figures, action toys, plush, and apparel under the Funko, Loungefly, and Mondo brands. Recent quarters show clear improvement, led by the Core Collectibles segment, lower promotional spending, and fewer Loungefly SKUs. Management has pointed to record gross margins backed by new licensing deals and a better channel mix. The company lifted its full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance while keeping net sales expectations at flat to modest growth. International sales, especially in Europe, have helped, though meaningful debt and a smaller market cap keep the stock more sensitive to swings. New commercial leadership and tariff-related claims have also influenced recent sentiment. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Hasbro operates across toys, board games, and digital gaming, with the Wizards of the Coast division and franchises like Magic: The Gathering and Dungeons & Dragons at the center. The company enjoys diversified revenue and recurring economics from licensing. Recent results have been driven by Magic: The Gathering surpassing $500 million in quarterly revenue for the first time, plus gains in digital and licensed gaming. Hasbro raised its full-year revenue and operating-margin outlook on cost savings and stronger cash flow. Offsetting factors include a non-cash impairment in digital games, tariff and input-cost pressure in consumer products, and an earlier network-access incident. Analyst coverage stays largely positive, with several Buy ratings and targets above recent prices.
The most obvious contrast is size and diversification. HAS runs a multi-billion-dollar revenue base with recurring franchise economics, a dividend, and a stronger balance sheet. FNKO is smaller and more leveraged, so its case rests on sustained margin execution and product timing. Growth drivers also diverge: Hasbro’s momentum sits mainly in high-margin gaming and digital licensing, while Funko depends more on discretionary spending and entertainment tie-ins. On risk, Funko’s higher leverage can lead to sharper moves, whereas Hasbro faces segment margin pressure, tariff exposure, and concentration around Magic: The Gathering. Analyst views tilt more favorably toward Hasbro.
Looking at trend consistency, earnings momentum, analyst positioning, and balance-sheet factors, a quantitative approach would likely favor HAS at present. Hasbro combines a clearer growth catalyst in gaming, raised guidance, stronger cash generation, and a more established position. FNKO offers an interesting but less proven turnaround with greater variability due to its scale and leverage. Any model-based view should be seen in probabilistic terms: Hasbro currently shows the steadier trend and lower relative uncertainty, while Funko sits as a higher-risk, higher-reward candidate.
When evaluating names like these, I often review Tickeron’s AI Trading Bots to see which automated strategies align with current market conditions. The platform runs hundreds of bots across thousands of tickers, each with distinct styles and timeframes. Checking the trending section gives a quick, data-driven filter on approaches that match prevailing trends right now.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HAS turned positive on October 01, 2026. Looking at past instances where HAS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 01, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HAS as a result. In 58 of 86 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
HAS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for HAS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 7 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 47%.
Following a +3.46% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HAS advanced for three days, in 208 of 311 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HAS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
HAS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for HAS entered a downward trend on October 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 17 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. HAS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 27 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HAS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 93 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: HAS's P/B Ratio (19.753) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (1.583). P/E Ratio (17.480) is within average values for comparable stocks, (0.695). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.630) is also within normal values, averaging (1.411). Dividend Yield (0.028) settles around the average of (0.033) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.546) is also within normal values, averaging (4.604).
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a manufacturer of games and toys
Industry RecreationalProducts