Granite Construction stands as one of the largest diversified infrastructure and materials companies in the United States, with operations spanning transportation, water, and other public projects. Its third-quarter report carries extra weight because it captures the peak of the construction season, when the largest share of annual revenue and profit is typically booked. Recent quarters have shown strong top-line momentum, with revenue up 28.8% year over year in the second quarter, but investors have grown more sensitive to margin trends after Materials segment profitability dipped on severe weather and higher quarry-development costs. This report will reveal whether record backlog is translating into profitable execution during the company's busiest stretch of the fiscal year. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Analysts forecast adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of about $3.40 for the third quarter of 2026, according to consensus estimates compiled by MarketWatch and MarketBeat, with individual projections ranging from roughly $2.85 to $3.87. Revenue is expected to come in near $1.70 billion. That compares with adjusted EPS of $2.70 and revenue of $1.43 billion in the year-ago third quarter, implying earnings growth of roughly 26% and top-line growth of about 19%.
Beyond the headline figures, investors will focus on gross margin, adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margin, and the Materials segment's cash gross profit, which recovered sharply in the first quarter but faced weather-related pressure in the second. CAP, the value of Granite's committed and awarded construction projects, is another closely tracked metric after it reached a record $7.4 billion at the end of the second quarter, including a notable rise in data center-related work.
Management's full-year 2026 guidance, last updated in the first quarter, calls for revenue of $5.2 billion to $5.4 billion and an adjusted EBITDA margin of 12.25% to 13.25%. Notably, GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) results may diverge from adjusted figures because of non-cash items tied to the company's convertible notes, including a remaining debt discount being recognized as interest expense in the third quarter. From what I see, tracking these details through tools like Tickeron’s AI Screener helps put the numbers in broader context.
Sentiment heading into the third-quarter print is mixed. Granite beat revenue expectations in the second quarter but missed on adjusted EPS, and shares reacted negatively as investors focused on Materials margin pressure. A GAAP net loss driven by a $363 million nonoperating charge related to convertible notes also clouded the headline picture, even though those items were excluded from adjusted results.
Analyst views remain divided, with one tracker showing a consensus "Hold" rating and a $158.50 price target, while others reflect an "Overweight" stance and targets above $170. This spread underscores the key debate: whether Granite's strong backlog and data center momentum can overcome lingering margin questions during the seasonally heavy third quarter. A clean beat on adjusted EPS with stable margins would likely reassure investors, while another margin miss could renew pressure on the stock.
Following this earnings event, investors should watch whether management reaffirms or adjusts its full-year guidance. Any movement in the revenue range or the adjusted EBITDA margin band would signal how the company expects the fourth quarter and the close of the fiscal year to unfold.
Margin recovery in the Materials segment is a central theme. Severe weather and higher quarry-production costs weighed on profitability in the second quarter, and management has indicated it expects those headwinds to reverse in the second half of the year. Confirmation of that recovery, alongside pricing trends in aggregates and asphalt, will be closely scrutinized.
Demand signals also matter. Data center-related CAP has grown sharply, and Granite has raised its longer-term organic growth target. Investors should look for updates on federal infrastructure funding and the tactical infrastructure projects for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which are expected to be substantially realized over 2026 and 2027. Finally, capital-allocation moves, including M&A (mergers and acquisitions) integration and the company's strengthened balance sheet, could shape the outlook beyond the quarter.
In preparing for reports like this one, I often rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter peers and spot patterns in backlog trends or margin metrics across the construction sector. It saves time when cross-checking consensus views against real-time signals, and the customizable filters make it straightforward to focus on what matters most for a name like GVA. This approach has helped me stay grounded when weighing growth potential against execution risks.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The RSI Indicator for GVA moved out of oversold territory on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 25 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 21 of the 25 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 84%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 36 of 49 cases where GVA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Following a +2.72% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GVA advanced for three days, in 214 of 318 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
GVA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GVA as a result. In 49 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for GVA turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 26 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 57%.
GVA moved below its 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GVA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
The Aroon Indicator for GVA entered a downward trend on October 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 9 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.476) is normal, around the industry mean (15.499). P/E Ratio (-29.029) is within average values for comparable stocks, (168.807). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.109) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.005) settles around the average of (0.185) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.134) is also within normal values, averaging (2.905).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. GVA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a contractor and producer of construction materials
Industry EngineeringConstruction