Intapp provides cloud software and AI tools aimed at professional services firms in regulated industries. The company continues its shift from on-premises licenses to subscription and cloud revenue, a change that has steadily boosted ARR and margins while weighing on older license sales. This update is worth watching because it tests whether cloud momentum and newer "governed AI" offerings, such as the Celeste platform, are delivering lasting growth. With investors focused on profitability and forward guidance in software, the market paid close attention not only to the beat but also to whether management’s outlook could match the higher expectations built during 2026. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
For the fiscal first quarter of 2027, ended September 30, 2026, Intapp posted total revenue of $161.3 million, a 16% year-over-year increase and ahead of the $159.18 million consensus. Adjusted (non-GAAP) diluted EPS reached $0.44, beating the $0.40 consensus. On a GAAP basis, the company recorded a net loss of $1.3 million, or $0.02 per share, narrowing sharply from the $14.4 million loss a year earlier.
Subscription revenue rose 29% to $125.5 million, following the July 2026 rename of "SaaS revenue" to "subscription revenue." Cloud ARR grew 28% to $515.3 million, while total ARR reached $607.1 million, up 20% year over year. Cloud ARR now accounts for 85% of total ARR, up from 80% a year ago, and trailing twelve-month cloud net revenue retention remained at 123%. Adjusted operating income increased to $35.4 million from $20.9 million a year earlier, and the company generated $28.4 million in operating cash flow while repurchasing 0.6 million shares for $25.0 million.
Guidance told a different story. For the fiscal second quarter, Intapp guided adjusted EPS to $0.37–$0.39 and revenue to $158.8–$159.8 million, with midpoints of $0.38 and $159.3 million falling below the $0.40 and $160.9 million consensus. Full-year fiscal 2027 guidance of $658.2–$662.2 million in revenue and $1.64–$1.68 in adjusted EPS came in essentially in line to slightly above consensus.
Intapp shares fell roughly 9% in after-hours trading after the release, even with the top- and bottom-line beat. The drop highlights how much sentiment in software depends on forward guidance. Investors appeared ready to reward strong cloud growth, expanding ARR, and better profitability, yet the softer second-quarter outlook prompted a quick reassessment of near-term expectations. The reaction shows the market had priced in ongoing momentum and reacted to any hint that growth or margin expansion might slow, even modestly.
Looking ahead, investors will focus on whether Intapp can close the gap between its strong trailing results and a more cautious near-term guide. The second-quarter outlook points to a sequential step-down in revenue and adjusted EPS, so the key question is whether this reflects timing, seasonality, or a genuine moderation in demand.
Cloud adoption stays the main growth engine. With cloud ARR now at 85% of total ARR and net revenue retention holding at 123%, continued migration and cross-sell within the installed base will matter. The path of the Celeste AI platform is another point to watch, as management has noted AI bookings as a rising share of net new bookings.
Margin and cash-flow trends also deserve attention. Adjusted operating income more than doubled year over year, and the company kept up its buyback, but higher investment in AI and go-to-market efforts could affect profitability in the near term. Industry conditions for professional services software, including spending by legal, accounting, and financial services firms, will shape demand. Tracking upcoming guidance updates, ARR growth, and retention metrics will give the clearest signals on whether the cloud-led strategy remains on track.
When I analyze software names like this one, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter peers by fundamentals, technical patterns, and performance metrics. It gives me a clearer view of how INTA stacks up and helps surface comparable opportunities across the sector without manual effort.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for INTA turned positive on October 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where INTA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 38 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 01, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on INTA as a result. In 67 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
INTA moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for INTA crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
Following a +5.87% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where INTA advanced for three days, in 241 of 299 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 7 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 15 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where INTA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
INTA broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for INTA entered a downward trend on October 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 6 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (11.359) is normal, around the industry mean (-1.637). P/E Ratio (-90.673) is within average values for comparable stocks, (15.502). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.632) is also within normal values, averaging (2.824). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.077) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.097) is also within normal values, averaging (71.128).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. INTA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. INTA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry PackagedSoftware