GET DAILY SIGNALSInvesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETFs: Weighing ADP Against PDP
Key Takeaways
- ADP and PDP are both rules-based, relative-strength momentum funds from Invesco's Dorsey Wright family, but they differ sharply in scope: ADP concentrates on technology, while PDP spans multiple sectors.
- PDP holds roughly 100 U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks, carries a 0.62% expense ratio, and spreads its weight across technology, industrials, healthcare, financials, and energy.
- ADP is a more concentrated, technology-centric vehicle, giving it a meaningfully higher sector-concentration and volatility profile than PDP's diversified mix.
- Both funds rebalance and reconstitute quarterly, so their holdings and sector weights shift with changing momentum leadership rather than remaining static.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) is favored for its broader diversification and more balanced risk-adjusted momentum profile.
Setting the Stage
Comparing ADP and PDP highlights how the same underlying methodology can lead to quite different exposures. Both ETFs rely on Dorsey Wright's relative-strength momentum approach, which ranks securities based on recent performance versus peers. Still, they serve distinct purposes: ADP narrows in on technology momentum, whereas PDP applies the same framework across a range of sectors. For investors considering concentrated thematic bets versus broader participation, these structural distinctions are worth examining closely.
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (ADP) Overview
ADP tracks a technology-focused relative-strength index from Dorsey Wright & Associates. It invests in U.S.-listed technology and related companies showing the strongest price momentum compared with peers. The strategy emphasizes relative strength over traditional fundamentals, which often results in a smaller, more concentrated portfolio tilted heavily toward large-cap information technology names. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry. ADP rebalances quarterly, allowing holdings to shift as momentum leadership changes. Its expense ratio sits near 0.60%, and the single-sector focus typically brings higher volatility and beta than broader alternatives. This ETF suits investors with a clear view on technology leadership who can tolerate concentration risk.
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) Overview
PDP follows the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, selecting about 100 U.S. large- and mid-cap companies with strong relative-strength traits across sectors. The fund typically holds 101 to 103 positions and carries a 0.62% expense ratio, with quarterly rebalancing reflected in its turnover. Recent holdings have featured AAPL, APH, TRGP, FIX, CRS, and ATI. Sector exposure is wider than ADP's, with information technology around one-third of assets and meaningful allocations to industrials, healthcare, financials, and energy. This setup lets PDP capture momentum as it appears across the market. Assets under management sit in the low billions with reasonable liquidity.
Market Environment and Risks
Both ETFs operate amid shifting sector leadership, interest-rate expectations, and earnings cycles. Strong demand for AI infrastructure and semiconductors has bolstered technology momentum, supporting ADP's focus and PDP's technology allocation. At the same time, gains in industrials, energy, and select financials have broadened participation, which aligns better with PDP's diversified approach. Risks include sensitivity to higher rates, regulatory pressure on large tech platforms, and abrupt sector rotations that can hurt concentrated positions. Momentum strategies are inherently exposed to sharp reversals, though PDP's cross-sector spread tends to cushion drawdowns compared with ADP.
Performance and Positioning Insights
In recent market cycles, both funds have benefited from momentum-style growth led by a narrow group of large-cap names. ADP's technology concentration can magnify gains in tech-driven rallies but also heighten losses during rotations. PDP's mix of industrials, healthcare, energy, and financials has historically delivered a smoother path while still participating in technology strength. With nearly identical expense ratios, the decision comes down to exposure philosophy: ADP for a high-conviction single-sector bet, PDP for diversified momentum with lower concentration risk.
Why PDP Stands Out
From what I see, factors like diversification, cost, trend consistency, and risk exposure point toward PDP over ADP. While ADP provides concentrated technology momentum access, its single-sector profile carries higher concentration and drawdown risk. PDP applies similar momentum methodology at comparable cost but with broader sector participation that has historically offered a more balanced, risk-adjusted profile. ADP can still appeal to investors with specific technology views, yet on balance PDP's diversified positioning appears better suited for durable exposure.
Using Tickeron AI Tools for ETF Analysis
I often turn to Tickeron's AI Screener when comparing ETFs like these. It lets me apply technical patterns, fundamentals, and performance filters to quickly surface differences in holdings, sector weights, and momentum signals. This approach helps refine views on risk and positioning without spending hours on manual reviews. The tool has become a regular part of how I evaluate similar strategies.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
ADP in upward trend: 10-day moving average moved above 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026
The 10-day moving average for ADP crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ADP as a result. In 47 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
ADP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +2.97% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ADP advanced for three days, in 155 of 313 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for ADP moved out of overbought territory on October 27, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 38 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 15 of the 38 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 39%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ADP turned negative on October 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 22 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 44%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ADP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
ADP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for ADP entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 17 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. ADP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 40 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 87 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (19.305) is normal, around the industry mean (-1.596). P/E Ratio (26.786) is within average values for comparable stocks, (15.525). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.446) is also within normal values, averaging (2.824). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (0.073) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.020) is also within normal values, averaging (71.128).
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
a provider of business outsourcing solutions
Industry PackagedSoftware
Advertisement