GET DAILY SIGNALSIYR vs USRT: Weighing Two BlackRock Real Estate ETFs
Key Takeaways
- IYR tracks the broad Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index, while USRT tracks the FTSE Nareit Equity REITs 40 Act Capped Index, giving the two funds meaningfully different definitions of "real estate" exposure.
- USRT is a pure equity REIT (real estate investment trust) vehicle with roughly 127 holdings; IYR holds around 62 names and includes real estate services and timber-related companies outside the traditional REIT universe.
- Cost is a decisive differentiator: USRT charges a 0.08% expense ratio versus IYR's 0.37%.
- USRT offers deeper diversification and lower concentration risk, while IYR carries a heavier tilt toward data center, telecom tower, and real estate services names.
- Both funds are passive, market-capitalization-weighted, and dominated by large-cap property operators such as Welltower and Prologis.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: USRT — its materially lower cost, broader diversification, and purer REIT mandate currently give it the structural edge over IYR.
Introduction
Real estate exchange-traded funds have drawn renewed attention as investors balance interest-rate expectations with steady property fundamentals and shifting demand toward data centers, healthcare facilities, and logistics. IYR and USRT are both from BlackRock and carry the "real estate" label, yet they are not interchangeable. This comparison looks at two overlapping but distinct approaches to U.S. property exposure: IYR's wider real-estate-sector definition versus USRT's narrower, lower-cost pure equity REIT strategy. The differences in sector reach, holdings, and fees matter when deciding which vehicle fits a given portfolio.
IYR: Broader Real-Estate-Sector Exposure
IYR follows the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index, a market-cap-weighted benchmark for the U.S. real estate equity sector. Launched in June 2000, the passive fund typically holds 60 to 65 securities and carries a 0.37% expense ratio. Top holdings concentrate in large-cap operators such as WELL, PLD, AMT, SPG, EQIX, DLR, and O, with the top ten names representing about half of assets.
One key distinction is IYR's broader view of real estate. In addition to conventional REITs, it includes the real estate services firm CBRE and timber company WY, adding exposure outside the pure equity REIT space. Sector weights stay almost entirely in real estate, with notable emphasis on healthcare, retail, and telecom tower REITs. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
USRT: A Purer, Lower-Cost REIT Approach
USRT tracks the FTSE Nareit Equity REITs 40 Act Capped Index, which covers U.S.-listed equity REITs while excluding mortgage, timber, and infrastructure REITs. Launched in May 2007, the passive fund holds roughly 127 securities and charges a 0.08% expense ratio. Its top holdings overlap with IYR but carry different weights: WELL, PLD, EQIX, SPG, PSA, DLR, O, VTR, and IRM. The top ten still account for about half the portfolio, yet the larger number of holdings lowers single-name concentration compared with IYR.
Exposure is effectively 100% real estate across healthcare, retail, industrial, data center, residential, self-storage, and office REITs. By excluding non-REIT real estate companies, USRT delivers a cleaner REIT portfolio at roughly one-fifth the cost of IYR. From what I see, this cost and diversification edge stands out over longer holding periods.
Industry and Thematic Context
Both ETFs operate amid durable real estate trends. Artificial intelligence has boosted demand for data center capacity, supporting names such as Equinix and Digital Realty Trust. Aging demographics continue to favor healthcare REITs like Welltower and Ventas, while e-commerce supports logistics assets held by Prologis. The sector remains sensitive to interest-rate policy because REITs depend on debt financing and compete with bonds for yield. Recent cycles show real estate equities reacting sharply to shifts in Federal Reserve expectations. Office REITs remain a smaller but lingering risk area amid hybrid work patterns, while healthcare, data center, and industrial segments have shown more resilience.
Performance and Positioning Notes
In recent periods the two funds have moved largely in tandem because of shared large-cap holdings, though positioning diverges at the margins. IYR's inclusion of telecom tower and real estate services names adds sensitivity to technology and corporate-services trends, while USRT's broader REIT base tends to smooth idiosyncratic risk. Performance differences have stemmed more from structural factors than from overlapping megacap positions. USRT's lower expense ratio creates a modest but compounding cost advantage, and its wider holdings reduce reliance on any single name. IYR's heavier tilt toward data centers and towers can amplify gains in technology-led rallies but may also increase volatility. Both distribute quarterly, though USRT's purer REIT composition aligns more closely with traditional REIT dividend patterns. I'm watching this closely as rate expectations evolve.
AI Screener
Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of securities using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener is designed to surface trade ideas, trending names, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your own ETF comparison and uncover signals aligned with your strategy.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor USRT over IYR. The decisive considerations are cost efficiency and diversification: USRT's 0.08% expense ratio is far lower than IYR's 0.37%, and its roughly 127 holdings offer broader coverage and reduced concentration risk than IYR's approximately 62 names. USRT also provides a cleaner, more consistent equity REIT mandate, while IYR's broader sector definition introduces non-REIT and more concentrated technology-adjacent exposure that may raise volatility. Although both funds share similar megacap drivers, USRT's lower cost, deeper diversification, and purer REIT profile give it a structural edge in the current environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
IYR's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for IYR turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where IYR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 41 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on IYR as a result. In 65 of 85 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
IYR moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for IYR crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +1.44% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IYR advanced for three days, in 255 of 309 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for IYR moved below the 200-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IYR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
IYR broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for IYR entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
What are Articles of Incorporation?
What is foreign exchange risk?
A Comprehensive Guide to Market Dynamics and Investment Strategies for the Best Crypto ETF Price
AI Trading Bots: Top Auto-Traders, Our Brokerage, on January 16, 2025
FAQ: How are the Buy and Sell recommendations formulated on the Tickeron platform?
General Information
Category RealEstate
Advertisement