Lazard's third-quarter report offers a snapshot of how one of Wall Street's most prominent independent advisory franchises is executing its "Lazard 2030" growth strategy. The quarter matters because it tests whether the firm's aggressive investments in lateral hiring and asset management distribution are converting into durable revenue growth. Investors were also watching closely whether the recovery in deal-making activity, which has lifted advisory revenue across the sector, could offset persistent compensation-cost pressure. With a new private capital advisory business, Lazard CL, set to launch in early November, this quarter's results provide a crucial baseline for evaluating the firm's broader diversification and profitability trajectory. I also checked this using Tickeron's AI Screener to see how LAZ compares to others in the industry.
Lazard reported third-quarter 2026 net revenue of $814.2 million, a 12.4% increase from the prior-year period, though this fell short of analyst estimates of roughly $852.5 million. Adjusted EPS came in at $0.36, below the consensus estimate of about $0.41 and down from $0.56 in the third quarter of 2025. On a U.S. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) basis, total revenue was $836.4 million.
Financial Advisory delivered adjusted net revenue of $465 million, a record for any third quarter and up 10% year over year, with the firm citing record M&A-driven revenue in both the Americas and the U.K. Asset Management contributed adjusted net revenue of $330 million, up 12.3% year over year. Management fees reached a record $321 million, up 18%, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of sequential growth.
AUM stood at $284 billion as of September 30, 2026, up 7.4% from a year earlier but slightly below the $286.3 billion analysts had projected. The quarter included $1.9 billion of market appreciation and $2.3 billion of net outflows. The adjusted compensation ratio was 69.9%, while the adjusted non-compensation ratio improved to 19.3% from 20.5% a year ago.
The initial market response to Lazard's report was muted, with shares holding around $37.66 immediately after the release. The subdued reaction reflected a mixed narrative: record advisory revenue demonstrated momentum in the firm's core franchise, but the EPS and revenue misses, combined with a higher adjusted effective tax rate of 38.1%, weighed on sentiment. Broader context also matters — Lazard shares had declined roughly 23% since the start of the year, even as the S&P 500 advanced, suggesting investors were already pricing in execution and cost concerns. The firm's commentary around a potential reduction in compensation deferral rates, which could temporarily raise the reported compensation ratio, added a near-term margin watchpoint to the story.
The most significant near-term catalyst is the November launch of Lazard CL, the firm's new private capital advisory business. Management has indicated the venture is expected to generate approximately $500 million of revenue and be accretive to earnings in 2027, before any potential synergies. Investors will be watching early client uptake and whether the business ramps on schedule.
In Asset Management, the focus shifts to net flows. While gross inflows reached a record $54 billion for the first nine months of 2026, the third quarter still posted $2.3 billion in net outflows. Management reiterated a goal of positive net flows for the full year, making fourth-quarter flow data a key metric to monitor.
On the cost side, Lazard signaled several structural changes. The firm is reviewing its compensation deferral practices, and any reduction in the deferral rate could temporarily lift the reported compensation ratio this year before easing in later periods. Separately, a corporate simplification initiative is expected to begin reducing expenses in 2027, while broader adoption of AI (artificial intelligence) is intended to improve productivity and long-term margins. Taken together, these factors make expense discipline, flow momentum, and the Lazard CL launch the central items for investors to track in the quarters ahead.
From what I see, tools like Tickeron's AI Screener help me quickly filter for patterns and fundamentals when reviewing names like LAZ. It lets me scan across industries and metrics in one place, which saves time when I'm building a broader view of how advisory firms stack up against peers. I find it useful as a starting point before diving into the numbers.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
LAZ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 27 of 35 cases where LAZ's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where LAZ's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on LAZ as a result. In 64 of 86 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for LAZ just turned positive on October 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where LAZ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +4.94% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LAZ advanced for three days, in 206 of 289 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 41 of 52 cases where LAZ's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LAZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Aroon Indicator for LAZ entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 36 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. LAZ’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.983) is normal, around the industry mean (3.638). P/E Ratio (16.910) is within average values for comparable stocks, (8.944). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.000) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.054) settles around the average of (7.191) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.200) is also within normal values, averaging (16.763).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LAZ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of financial advisory and asset management services
Industry InvestmentBanksBrokers