GET DAILY SIGNALSPFFA vs PFXF: Weighing Active Leverage Against Passive Efficiency in Preferred ETFs
Key Takeaways
- PFFA is an actively managed, semi-transparent ETF that may apply leverage to boost income, while PFXF is a passive, rules-based fund that tracks an index of non-financial preferred securities.
- Cost is a defining difference: PFFA carries a 2.11% net expense ratio, whereas PFXF charges 0.40%, a meaningful structural advantage for PFXF.
- Exposure profiles diverge sharply — PFFA is heavily weighted to financials (over half of assets), while PFXF deliberately excludes financials and concentrates in technology and utility preferreds.
- Both funds target current income, but PFFA seeks higher yield through active selection and optional leverage, while PFXF offers lower-cost, more diversified index exposure.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: On structural efficiency, diversification, and cost, PFXF is the preferred choice of the two.
Why These Preferred ETFs Stand Out for Income Investors
Preferred securities have drawn attention from income-focused investors amid still-elevated interest rates. Both PFFA and PFXF offer access to this hybrid asset class, but they take very different paths. They are not interchangeable: PFFA is an actively managed fund with a focus on financial-sector preferreds and the option to use leverage, while PFXF follows a passive, non-financial preferreds approach. This comparison looks at how their sector exposures, costs, and positioning affect potential outcomes.
PFFA: An Active, Leveraged Take on Preferred Income
PFFA is an actively managed, semi-transparent ETF aimed at current income, with capital appreciation as a secondary goal. Launched in May 2018, it invests mainly in U.S.-listed preferred securities and can use leverage at times to increase yield. The fund typically holds around 190–200 positions and shows a portfolio turnover rate near 24%. Top holdings have included preferred issues from Strategy Inc, Alphabet Inc, Flagstar Bank, KKR & Co, Qwest Corporation, Energy Transfer, Boeing Co, and Oracle Corp. Financials make up more than half of assets in recent data, with additional exposure to real estate, industrials, communication services, and utilities. Its net expense ratio stands at 2.11%, which accounts for active management and leverage costs. This setup positions PFFA as a more concentrated, financials-oriented income vehicle.
PFXF: A Passive, Ex-Financials Approach to Preferreds
PFXF is a passively managed ETF designed to track the ICE Exchange-Listed Fixed & Adjustable Rate Non-Financial Preferred Securities Index. Launched in July 2012, it holds roughly 115–120 positions and rebalances monthly on a market-cap-weighted, rules-based basis. Its mandate excludes financial issuers, creating a different exposure profile. Recent top holdings include preferred issues from Boeing Co, Oracle Corp, Strategy Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Albemarle, Super Micro Computer, NextEra Energy, and Alphabet Inc. Sector weightings lean toward software and IT services, electric utilities, REITs, and hardware. The fund’s net expense ratio is 0.40%, and it is non-diversified. By steering clear of the financial-heavy preferreds space, PFXF delivers broader issuer diversification and a lower cost structure.
The Broader Preferred Securities Landscape
Preferred securities sit between equities and bonds, providing income potential that can compete with high-yield debt. The sector reacts to interest-rate expectations, showing duration sensitivity and responding to Treasury yield shifts. Financial issuers dominate the preferreds universe, which is why an ex-financials strategy like PFXF adds distinct diversification. Current drivers include demand for yield, flows into income vehicles, and issuer credit conditions. Bank regulatory requirements influence financial preferred issuance, while technology and utility issuers have grown the non-financial segment. Risks in the sector include rate volatility, credit downgrades, and concentration in certain issuers or industries. From what I see, I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to compare sector exposures across similar funds.
How Performance and Positioning Differ
In recent periods, the two funds have shown distinct risk and return profiles based on their holdings. PFFA’s financial-heavy, leveraged stance has increased sensitivity to credit conditions and rate changes, with its higher expense ratio acting as a steady drag on net returns. Its distribution yield has tended to run higher due to leverage and active selection. PFXF, meanwhile, has displayed lower volatility relative to the broader equity market, with a beta near 0.6 versus the S&P 500 in recent measures. Its technology and utility tilt aligns with issuers that have different earnings drivers than the bank-dominated preferreds market. Over recent cycles, this has led to more stable, though lower, headline income. The core trade-off for investors remains higher yield and leverage versus cost efficiency and diversification. I’m watching this closely as rate environments shift.
Exploring Tickeron AI Tools for Deeper ETF Analysis
In my own research process, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI tools to scan for patterns and compare ETF characteristics more efficiently. The AI Screener has proven useful for filtering preferreds funds by cost, sector exposure, and volatility metrics, helping surface ideas that align with specific income goals. It supports customizable views on technical signals and performance data, which can complement traditional due diligence without replacing it. This approach keeps the focus on structural factors rather than short-term noise.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor PFXF. Its 0.40% expense ratio offers a decisive cost advantage over PFFA’s 2.11%, and its ex-financials mandate provides broader issuer diversification within the preferreds asset class. A passive, rules-based, monthly-rebalanced framework supports trend consistency and transparency, while its lower beta suggests more measured volatility. Although PFFA may deliver higher headline income through leverage and active management, its financials concentration and elevated costs weaken its structural profile. On a probabilistic, cost- and diversification-adjusted basis, PFXF presents the stronger relative positioning of the two.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.
PFXF's RSI Indicator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for PFXF moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 28 of the 29 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 16 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PFXF advanced for three days, in 237 of 331 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
PFXF may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PFXF as a result. In 58 of 75 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PFXF turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 71%.
PFXF moved below its 50-day moving average on October 07, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 50-day moving average for PFXF moved below the 200-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PFXF declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The Aroon Indicator for PFXF entered a downward trend on November 06, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Industry description
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category RetirementIncome
Advertisement