Planet Labs PBC provides global daily satellite imagery and geospatial solutions. Founded in 2010 by three NASA scientists, the company builds and operates the world’s largest fleet of Earth-observation satellites that image the planet every day. Its data platform supports defense, intelligence, civil government, agriculture, forestry, energy, and finance clients. As a public benefit corporation listed on the New York Stock Exchange, PL offers exposure to geospatial intelligence and AI-enabled analytics.
Over the past 30 days, PL shares declined roughly 24.9%, moving from a close of $22.62 on August 19 to $16.99 on September 17. The drop occurred gradually rather than in one session, though an earnings reaction in early September accelerated the move. Looking back three months to mid-June, when the stock traded near $28.23, shares have fallen about 40% over the quarter. This places the recent decline inside a broader pullback that has erased most of the sharp gains recorded earlier in 2026.
The main driver was the fiscal second-quarter 2027 earnings release on September 3. Planet Labs reported record revenue of $116.1 million, up 58% year over year and ahead of estimates, along with non-GAAP earnings of $0.02 per share versus an expected loss. Adjusted EBITDA reached $13.9 million, and the company raised the lower end of full-year revenue guidance to a range of $430 million to $441 million. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to compare the results against peers. Despite the beat, shares dropped more than 8% as investors focused on third-quarter guidance of $101 million to $105 million, which implied a sequential decline tied to the timing of a satellite handover. Higher capital-expenditure guidance of $100 million to $115 million and a sequential decline in backlog added to concerns about valuation and cash intensity.
The wider quarterly decline reflects a valuation reset more than any fundamental deterioration. After rallying roughly 160% through late May and pushing the market capitalization above $18 billion, PL traded at a forward price-to-sales ratio above 30x. When first-quarter results of $94 million revenue (up 42% year over year) did not match the market’s elevated expectations, the stock fell about 26% in a single session. Since then, investors have continued to reassess the still-high multiple, the concentration of growth in government contracts, and the capital needs of next-generation satellite programs. The result is a decline of more than 60% from the 2026 high, even as operating metrics have strengthened.
Attention now turns to the next earnings report in mid-December. Investors will watch whether third-quarter revenue falls within the guided $101 million to $105 million range and how the satellite-services pipeline, described by management as exceeding $4 billion in opportunity, converts into contracts. Progress on the Pelican, Owl, and Tanager programs, along with AI-enabled analytics monetization, will also matter. Additional items include defense-contract timing, backlog trends, capital-expenditure discipline, and the stock’s valuation relative to growth. Macro conditions, government procurement cycles, and competitive dynamics in Earth observation remain relevant external factors. From what I see, these elements will shape the near-term path for PL.
In my own research process, I regularly review Tickeron’s AI Trading Bots to see how automated strategies are performing across similar growth names. The platform hosts hundreds of AI robots that trade thousands of tickers, and the trending section highlights those with the strongest recent consistency. Looking at these can surface additional data points that complement traditional fundamental work without replacing it.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The 50-day moving average for PL moved below the 200-day moving average on August 17, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 20, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PL as a result. In 73 of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PL turned negative on August 26, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 38 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 79%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
The Aroon Indicator for PL entered a downward trend on September 17, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PL's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 19 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 38 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (10.331) is normal, around the industry mean (6.263). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (55.218). PL's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.867). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.017) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (14.104) is also within normal values, averaging (18.155).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PL’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 85 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry AerospaceDefense