Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Oct 24, 2026
PLTR vs PLTW: Palantir Stock and Its Leveraged WeeklyPay ETF

PLTR vs PLTW: Palantir Stock and Its Leveraged WeeklyPay ETF

Key Takeaways

  • PLTR is Palantir Technologies Inc., a data-analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) software company, while PLTW is not a company but the Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF — a leveraged income fund whose performance is tied to PLTR.
  • Palantir reported revenue of roughly $1.94 billion in its most recent quarter, up 93% year over year, with U.S. revenue rising about 115%.
  • PLTW targets 120% (1.2x) of Palantir's weekly return and pays weekly distributions, but those distributions are largely classified as return of capital rather than earnings.
  • The two tickers carry very different risk profiles: PLTR is a single operating company trading at a premium valuation, while PLTW adds leverage and volatility drag on top of PLTR's price moves.
  • This is less a company-versus-company contest and more a contrast between owning an underlying business and owning a leveraged income instrument linked to that same business.
  • PLTR has traded near record highs in recent weeks, whereas PLTW's price has been pressured by the path-dependent, leveraged mechanics of its weekly reset.
  • For more detail on each ticker's developments and daily price action, explore PLTR Major News, PLTR Today's Price Move, PLTW Major News, and PLTW Today's Price Move.
  • To see how automated strategies are currently positioned across the market, explore Trending AI Robots.

Introduction

At first glance, PLTR and PLTW appear to be two sides of the same trade — and in a sense, they are. One is Palantir Technologies, the fast-growing AI and data-analytics firm. The other is an exchange-traded fund (ETF), meaning a pooled investment vehicle, built specifically to amplify Palantir's weekly moves while paying out income. Comparing them is therefore not a standard matchup of two rivals, but a study in how the same underlying business can be accessed with very different levels of risk, income potential, and market positioning. Growth-oriented investors tracking Palantir's expansion, and income-oriented traders weighing leveraged yield products, will both find this comparison directly relevant. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.

PLTR Overview and Recent Performance

PLTR, Palantir Technologies, sells AI-driven software platforms used by government agencies and commercial enterprises to integrate and analyze large datasets. Its most recent quarterly results underscored accelerating demand: revenue reached about $1.94 billion, up 93% from the prior year, with U.S. revenue climbing roughly 115% to about $1.57 billion. Government and commercial segments are now nearly balanced in size, and the company raised its full-year revenue outlook to around $8.15 billion.

That operational strength has been tempered by valuation debate. Palantir's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, a common measure of how much investors pay per dollar of earnings, has hovered well above 150, leaving little room for missteps. Recent market activity has also reflected geopolitical and sector-level concerns, including questions about European control over U.S.-built defense software. Despite these headwinds, analysts maintain a broadly constructive stance, with an average price target implying modest additional upside from levels near $200. From what I see, the growth trajectory remains compelling even as the valuation invites caution.

PLTW Overview and Recent Performance

PLTW is the Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF, an actively managed fund launched in February 2025. Its objective is twofold: to pay weekly distributions to shareholders and to deliver calendar-week returns equal to approximately 1.2 times (120%) the weekly total return of Palantir common shares. The fund achieves this through total return swap agreements, Palantir stock, and short-term U.S. Treasury securities, and it carries an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Its headline distribution yield has at times appeared extremely high, but investors should note that these payments have largely been classified as return of capital (ROC), meaning the fund is effectively returning some of shareholders' own money rather than paying out earned income. Because the fund resets its leverage weekly, its performance is path-dependent: it can lag Palantir's cumulative return even when the underlying stock rises, due to the compounding effect of leverage and volatility. In recent weeks, this has translated into negative year-to-date price performance for PLTW despite Palantir trading near record highs. I'm watching this closely because the mechanics can surprise even experienced income-focused traders.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of automated trading strategies from a much larger library of hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers. Each bot operates with its own trading style, timeframe, strategy, and performance statistics, and only those judged most suitable for current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. This makes the page a useful starting point for traders who want to observe how algorithmic approaches — including those that may reference high-momentum and leveraged instruments such as PLTR and PLTW — are positioned right now. Exploring the page can help you identify strategies aligned with your own objectives and risk tolerance.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The core distinction between these two tickers is structural. PLTR represents ownership in an operating company whose value is driven by revenue growth, contract wins, and profit expansion. PLTW represents a leveraged, income-oriented wrapper around that same company, engineered to magnify short-term price swings and distribute cash weekly.

From a growth-driver standpoint, PLTR benefits directly from enterprise and government AI adoption. PLTW has no independent growth drivers; its fortunes are entirely derivative of PLTR's weekly performance. On risk, PLTR faces valuation and geopolitical exposure, while PLTW layers on leverage, swap counterparty risk, and volatility drag. On income, PLTR pays no meaningful dividend, whereas PLTW offers frequent distributions — albeit largely as return of capital. Finally, momentum diverges: PLTR has sustained an upward trend, while PLTW's leveraged weekly reset has produced choppier, weaker cumulative price performance. In short, PLTR offers direct business exposure, while PLTW offers amplified, income-flavored tactical exposure with additional complexity.

Using AI Tools for Deeper Analysis

When comparing instruments like these, I often rely on Tickeron’s AI tools to cross-check signals across momentum, volatility, and positioning. One thing that stands out is how the platform surfaces relative strength metrics that help clarify why a direct equity holding and a leveraged wrapper can diverge so sharply even when tied to the same underlying name. This kind of data-driven view supports the broader conclusion without replacing individual due diligence.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: PLTR, PLTW

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


PLTR sees MACD Histogram just turned negative

PLTR saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 16, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 47 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 79%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for PLTR moved out of overbought territory on October 14, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 34 of the 45 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 76%.

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PLTR as a result. In 65 of 88 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PLTR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.

PLTR broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 53 of 65 cases where PLTR's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

Following a +7.69% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PLTR advanced for three days, in 284 of 329 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 240 of 278 cases where PLTR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 86%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 27 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PLTR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (48.372) is normal, around the industry mean (16.722). P/E Ratio (154.921) is within average values for comparable stocks, (59.321). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.805) is also within normal values, averaging (3.648). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.210) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (72.993) is also within normal values, averaging (103.889).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), Oracle Corp (NYSE:ORCL), Palo Alto Networks Inc (NASDAQ:PANW), Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:CRWD), Block Inc (NYSE:XYZ), NetApp (NASDAQ:NTAP), Zscaler (NASDAQ:ZS), Twilio (NYSE:TWLO), Okta (NASDAQ:OKTA), MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB).

Industry description

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Computer Communications Industry is 36.21B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 48.8K to 3.89T. MSFT holds the highest valuation in this group at 3.89T. The lowest valued company is WMHI at 48.8K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Computer Communications Industry was 2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -8%, and the average quarterly price growth was 6%. ATGL experienced the highest price growth at 92%, while CHOW experienced the biggest fall at -61%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Computer Communications Industry was -44%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -19% and the average quarterly volume growth was -44%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 49
P/E Growth Rating: 51
Price Growth Rating: 60
SMR Rating: 78
Profit Risk Rating: 91
Seasonality Score: -1 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
PLTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Industry ComputerCommunications

Industry
N/A
Address
19505 Biscayne Boulevard
Phone
+1 720 358-3679
Employees
4429
Web
https://www.palantir.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
TSMX, a 2x daily leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund), rose roughly +19% over the trailing 30 days, rebounding sharply from mid-September lows. The fund seeks 200% of the daily return of TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), meaning its moves are roughly double the underlying stock's daily swings.
Contracted revenue anchor: A roughly $3.2 billion, seven-year LNG (liquefied natural gas) supply agreement with Puerto Rico has received final approval, providing multi-year cash-flow visibility if execution stays on track. Project pipeline inflection: Upcoming milestones include the Barcarena and PortoCem power plants in Brazil, a potential Gás Sul terminal restart, and optimization of the company's modular "Fast LNG" (FLNG) liquefaction fleet.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) designs central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and AI accelerators, while LRCX (Lam Research) supplies the wafer-fabrication equipment used to build advanced chips. AMD has delivered strong double-digit revenue growth on AI data-center demand, but its shares trade with elevated expectations that can trigger sharp reactions around earnings.
Origination momentum: Velocity Financial enters 2026 off record annual originations of roughly $2.7 billion (up about 48%), positioning it to keep gaining share in a fragmented investor-loan market. Credit normalization is the central watch item: Nonperforming loans fell toward the 8.5% range of portfolio unpaid principal balance (UPB), but asset quality remains the primary swing factor for earnings.
Turnaround milestone ahead: Management has pointed to reaching cash generation in 2027, making the pace of cost discipline and margin recovery the central question for the stock forecast. Fresh capital supports execution: A recently announced $45.5 million equity financing, with participation from management and a single institutional investor, strengthens the balance sheet as the company funds its transformation.
NFE closed at $5.51, down -6.13% during Tuesday's regular session, extending a slide that has pushed shares near a 52-week low. Primary catalyst: the company disclosed its Fast LNG unit is offline after a gas-turbine mechanical failure, with return to service not expected until Q4.
The central $11 target is the arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, rounded from roughly $10.75. With the stock near $2.06, reaching $11 would require an upside of more than 400%, an extremely large move.
The $23 central target is the rounded arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, which average $23.25. The latest verified price is around $9.57, meaning the target implies roughly 140% upside—a very large move.
NXH closed down -11.17% (-$0.23) to $1.83 on Oct 6, the most recent regular session, extending a steep two-day decline. Selling continued as investors digested the mutual termination of the Fathom Holdings merger and a dilutive $45.5M registered direct offering of ~16.5M shares at $2.76.
AMD is a large-cap designer of CPUs (central processing units) and GPUs (graphics processing units) competing directly with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market, while FORM is a small-cap provider of semiconductor test and measurement equipment, primarily probe cards. AMD's narrative has been driven by multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler deals, while FORM's has been powered by record revenue and sharp margin expansion tied to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand.
AMD has surged roughly 200% year to date, crossing a $1 trillion market capitalization on AI data-center demand and a "CPU renaissance" narrative. KLAC has gained about 71% year to date, supported by record process-control revenue and rapid growth in advanced packaging for AI chips.
AMD is a large-cap semiconductor designer riding explosive AI compute demand, while ENTG is a mid-cap supplier of materials and purity solutions that feed the same AI-driven chip cycle. AMD recently crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization on surging data center revenue, whereas ENTG operates at a far smaller scale (roughly $23 billion) with steadier, double-digit growth.
VELO closed Tuesday at $9.57, unchanged (+0.00%) from the prior session, with the move occurring during regular market hours. The flat close marked stabilization after Monday's -14.5% plunge, when shares fell to $9.57 from $11.20 following disclosure of CFO James Suva's departure.
The $8 target used here is a technical, publicly discussed recovery objective — not an analyst consensus — because legacy analyst price targets were set before NFE's restructuring and reverse stock split. New Fortress Energy Inc. ( NFE ) trades near $5.51, so reaching $8 implies a roughly 45% advance.
AVBP plunged -46.98% during Tuesday's regular session, closing at $15.09 versus $28.46, marking its worst single-day decline on record. The catalyst was the Phase 3 FURVENT trial of firmonertinib failing its primary endpoint—progression-free survival—in first-line EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer.
Upcoming catalyst: The company's next earnings release is estimated for November 6, 2026, which should offer fresh detail on its SKY token holdings, staking rewards, and treasury strategy. Strategic positioning: SDEV is an on-chain holding company providing public-market exposure to the Sky protocol ecosystem, with SKY as its core digital asset and a stated focus on the stablecoin economy.
Different roles in the chip ecosystem: AMAT is a materials-engineering and deposition leader, while KLAC dominates process control, inspection, and yield management. Momentum favors AMAT: AMAT shares have more than doubled this year, while KLAC has recently pulled back roughly 9% in a month on margin and execution concerns.