GET DAILY SIGNALSQBTS vs RGTI: Two Quantum Computing Stocks Navigating Declines of -50% and -47% Year to Date
Key Takeaways
- Both QBTS and RGTI are pure-play quantum computing companies that have posted sharp year-to-date declines amid a broader repricing of speculative growth stocks.
- D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) operates a dual-platform strategy spanning annealing and gate-model systems, while Rigetti Computing (RGTI) focuses on superconducting gate-based quantum processors.
- Each company secured up to $100 million in CHIPS and Science Act funding, giving both a government-backed catalyst while introducing minority equity dilution.
- Relative performance has favored RGTI modestly over recent weeks, though both names remain highly volatile with betas well above the broader market.
- Revenue remains small and lumpy for both firms, with losses still far exceeding sales, keeping execution risk elevated across the sector.
- Neither company currently generates profit, so valuation is driven primarily by growth expectations rather than earnings.
- For more detail on each ticker, explore QBTS Major News and QBTS Today's Price Move, as well as RGTI Major News and RGTI Today's Price Move.
- To see how automated systems are positioning across this market, explore Trending AI Robots.
Introduction
Quantum computing remains one of the most closely watched speculative technology themes, and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and Rigetti Computing (RGTI) stand at the center of it. Both are early-stage, cash-burning hardware developers competing for government funding, research contracts, and early commercial deployments. This comparison is most relevant to growth-oriented traders and investors comfortable with elevated volatility who want to understand how two prominent quantum names differ in technology, financial position, and market positioning. While both stocks have benefited from the same sector-wide catalysts, their business models and recent trajectories diverge in meaningful ways that can shape relative performance and risk.
QBTS Overview and Recent Performance
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) develops and delivers quantum computing systems, software, and services. The company is notable for operating both annealing systems—its historical specialty—and gate-model quantum computers, a dual-platform approach strengthened by its acquisition of Quantum Circuits Inc. Its customer base spans logistics, manufacturing, and defense, with deployments tied to organizations such as BASF, Davidson Technologies, and North Wales Police. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
In recent weeks, QBTS has come under sustained selling pressure, falling roughly 30% over the past month and more than 50% year to date. The decline has been driven less by company-specific failures than by sector-wide sentiment shifts, including a large stock sale by peer IonQ that raised concerns about dilution across the industry. A securities class action lawsuit—whose allegations remain unproven—added a legal overhang. At the same time, the company finalized up to $100 million in CHIPS Act funding, delivered an Advantage2 system to Como, Italy, and extended its manufacturing agreement with SkyWater, underscoring that operational progress has continued even as the share price weakened.
RGTI Overview and Recent Performance
Rigetti Computing (RGTI) builds and operates superconducting quantum processors and the systems built around them. Its approach centers on gate-based, modular chiplet architecture, exemplified by systems such as the Novera QPU (quantum processing unit) and the Cepheus-1-108Q platform. Revenue is generated through system sales, cloud access, and government and research contracts, with notable relationships including the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory and India's C-DAC.
RGTI has also faced significant pressure, down roughly 20% over the past month and close to 47% year to date, though its recent decline has been somewhat milder than that of D-Wave. Like its peer, Rigetti finalized a definitive agreement for up to $100 million in CHIPS and Science Act funding, which initially boosted shares but has not reversed the broader pullback. The company ended its latest quarter with more than $500 million in cash and no debt, a balance-sheet cushion that provides runway. However, revenue remains highly dependent on the timing of system deliveries, keeping quarterly results uneven and sentiment sensitive to delivery schedules.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The most significant contrast between these two companies lies in their technological focus. QBTS offers a dual-platform model spanning annealing and gate-model systems, giving it broader exposure across quantum computing approaches. RGTI, by contrast, is concentrated on superconducting gate-based processors with a modular chiplet design, positioning it squarely in the race toward larger, fault-tolerant systems.
Financially, both companies remain deeply unprofitable, but their cash positions differ in scale. D-Wave reported roughly $546 million in cash at mid-year against expectations of substantial ongoing cash burn, while Rigetti ended its latest quarter with over $500 million in cash and no debt. Both secured comparable CHIPS Act awards, meaning neither enjoys a clear funding advantage, though each accepted minority government equity stakes in return. From what I see, the balance-sheet details remain a key differentiator worth monitoring.
On momentum and sentiment, RGTI has held up somewhat better than QBTS over recent weeks, in part because D-Wave has faced the added weight of a securities lawsuit. Both carry beta well above 2, indicating sharp amplification of broader market moves. Sector exposure is essentially identical, leaving the comparison focused on technology breadth, balance-sheet durability, and near-term catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean modestly toward RGTI in the current environment. Rigetti's comparatively smaller recent drawdown, debt-free balance sheet, and absence of the legal overhang currently facing D-Wave contribute to a slightly more stable relative profile. That said, both names remain high-risk, high-volatility instruments, and any edge is narrow and probabilistic rather than definitive. The outcome could shift quickly with earnings reports, delivery updates, or renewed sector-wide selling pressure, underscoring why a data-driven, continuously updated approach matters in this space. I’m watching this closely as new data emerges.
Using Tickeron AI Tools in My Analysis
In my own work reviewing names like these, I regularly turn to Tickeron’s AI Trading Bots to test how automated strategies might respond to similar volatility patterns. The platform lets me review a range of approaches and see which ones have shown stronger recent results in fast-moving sectors. This helps add an extra layer of perspective without replacing core fundamental checks.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.
Momentum Indicator for RGTI turns negative, indicating new downward trend
RGTI saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 86 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 77 of the 86 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for RGTI turned negative on November 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 40 of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 85%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RGTI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
The Aroon Indicator for RGTI entered a downward trend on November 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where RGTI's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 28 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +31.78% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RGTI advanced for three days, in 217 of 253 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
RGTI may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 23 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.297) is normal, around the industry mean (-6.197). P/E Ratio (-15.260) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.670). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. RGTI's P/S Ratio (370.370) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (51.774).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 85 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. RGTI’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. RGTI’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock worse than average.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Industry ComputerProcessingHardware
Advertisement