Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Nov 10, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Shows Revenue Growth but Wider-Than-Expected Loss in Q3

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Shows Revenue Growth but Wider-Than-Expected Loss in Q3

Key Takeaways

  • Revenue rose 21% year over year to $4.5 million, slightly above analyst estimates.
  • The net loss narrowed to $0.13 per share from $0.41 a year earlier, but came in wider than consensus expectations.
  • Quarterly bookings fell 19% to $1.9 million, even as nine-month bookings surged 611% to $37.4 million.
  • Remaining performance obligations (RPO), a measure of contracted future work, reached $38.3 million, up 1,221% year over year.
  • The company ended the quarter with $503.4 million in cash and marketable investment securities.

Why This Report Matters

D-Wave Quantum's quarterly results carry outsized weight because the company remains a high-valuation, pre-profit quantum computing pioneer whose stock has been among the most volatile in the sector. After a dramatic 2025 rally, shares retreated sharply in 2026, making each earnings report a key test of whether commercial demand can justify investor expectations. The report matters beyond the headline figures: investors are watching whether system sales, recurring cloud revenue, and a growing pipeline can translate into a credible path toward profitability. With the broader quantum industry consolidating and competitors raising their own guidance, D-Wave Quantum's ability to sustain momentum in bookings and revenue recognition has become central to the investment thesis. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.

What the Numbers Show

D-Wave Quantum reported revenue of $4.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2026 ended September 30, 2026, an increase of 21% from $3.7 million in the prior-year period. Revenue slightly exceeded analyst estimates, but the company posted a net loss of $48.2 million, or $0.13 per share, wider than the consensus expectation of roughly $0.10 per share. Notably, the loss narrowed sharply from $0.41 per share a year earlier, though much of that improvement reflected the absence of a prior-year non-cash warrant remeasurement charge rather than operational gains.

On a GAAP basis, gross profit was $2.4 million with a gross margin of 52.9%, down from 71.4% a year earlier. Revenue composition shifted toward QCaaS subscriptions, which grew 56% to $2.2 million, and professional services, which rose 318% to $2.0 million, while systems and other revenue declined. From what I see, the shift in revenue mix highlights both opportunities and margin pressures ahead.

Market Reaction and Investor Sentiment

D-Wave Quantum shares declined roughly 8% following the report, reflecting investor disappointment over the wider-than-expected loss and the quarter's softer bookings figure. The drop partially reversed a pre-earnings rally that had been fueled by a rival's raised guidance and renewed enthusiasm across the quantum computing space. Analysts noted a tension between trailing results and leading indicators: while revenue beat estimates and the net loss narrowed, quarterly bookings fell and the backlog shrank, suggesting the company may be consuming contracted work faster than it is replenishing it. The market's reaction underscored how sensitive this high-multiple, still-unprofitable name remains to any sign that commercial momentum is cooling, even when headline financials appear to improve.

Forward Outlook and Key Factors to Monitor

The immediate focus turns to the fourth quarter, where the timing of system deliveries will heavily influence revenue. D-Wave Quantum expects to deliver a system to Florida Atlantic University in the fourth quarter, with a substantial portion of that revenue recognized upon delivery. Analysts estimate the company will need a sizable fourth-quarter revenue figure, in the range of roughly $32 million, to meet full-year 2026 expectations.

Beyond the near term, investors should watch whether the company's sales pipeline, which management said grew more than 75% sequentially, converts into actual bookings. Margins also deserve attention: the shift toward lower-margin professional services compressed gross margin, and investors will be looking for signs that system sales and higher-margin cloud subscriptions rebalance the mix.

Finally, the company's access to up to $100 million in CHIPS and Science Act funding remains milestone-based, so any progress on those conditions could serve as a catalyst. D-Wave Quantum's roadmap targets a 17-qubit gate-model system with orders for 2027 delivery, and execution on that timeline will be closely monitored as the competitive quantum landscape continues to evolve. I’m watching this closely as the next few quarters should clarify whether the pipeline converts effectively.

Using AI Tools for Deeper Analysis

In my own process, I frequently rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to cross-check sector trends and identify comparable names in quantum computing. This helps surface potential opportunities or risks that might not be obvious from earnings alone, especially when evaluating high-volatility names like QBTS.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: QBTS

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


QBTS's RSI Indicator climbs out of oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for QBTS moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 27 of the 28 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 56 of 61 cases where QBTS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QBTS just turned positive on November 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where QBTS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 33 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.

Following a +26.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QBTS advanced for three days, in 167 of 198 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

QBTS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QBTS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The Aroon Indicator for QBTS entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.743) is normal, around the industry mean (-6.197). P/E Ratio (-15.257) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.670). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. QBTS's P/S Ratio (476.190) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (51.774).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. QBTS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QBTS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock worse than average.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Arista Networks Inc (NYSE:ANET), Dell Technologies (NYSE:DELL), Seagate Technology Holdings PLC (NASDAQ:STX), Western Digital Corp (NASDAQ:WDC), HP (NYSE:HPQ), 3D Systems Corp (NYSE:DDD).

Industry description

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Computer Processing Hardware Industry is 20.25B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from -0.18 to 215.42B. ANET holds the highest valuation in this group at 215.42B. The lowest valued company is HAUP at -0.18.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Computer Processing Hardware Industry was -8%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20%. CRCT experienced the highest price growth at 45%, while AMCI experienced the biggest fall at -49%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Computer Processing Hardware Industry was -5%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 16% and the average quarterly volume growth was -56%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 42
P/E Growth Rating: 51
Price Growth Rating: 69
SMR Rating: 80
Profit Risk Rating: 90
Seasonality Score: -14 (-100 ... +100)
AI Screener 4
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Industry ComputerProcessingHardware

Industry
N/A
Address
2650 East Bayshore Road
Phone
+1 650 285-28812
Employees
382
Web
https://www.dwavequantum.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
AtlasClear Holdings (ATCH) shares fell roughly 25.5% over the last 30 days, declining from $0.1881 on October 2 to $0.1401 on October 30. The pullback extended a longer downtrend that has kept the stock trading well below the $1.00 NYSE American minimum, keeping continued listing-compliance risk in focus.
XRPN fell -9.70% in early regular-session trading on Tuesday, sliding from Monday's $10.41 close to $9.40. The decline follows a November 9 SEC prospectus disclosing a committed equity facility with Cantor to sell up to 5.2 million new Class A shares at 97% of the volume-weighted average price, implying up to roughly 16.7% potential dilution.
The $1.50 central target is a fallback objective drawn from public market and technical discussion, not an analyst consensus, because AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AQB) has no credible, current sell-side price targets. With the stock near $0.95, reaching $1.50 would require roughly 58% upside, a very large move for a company that has wound down its core aquaculture operations.
The central target of $1,620 is the arithmetic mean of verified, current analyst price targets, rounded to a clean level; it is not a single firm's forecast or a guarantee. At a recent price of about $690 , reaching $1,620 would require a gain of roughly 135% , a very large move by any standard.
NVDA fell -2.10% to $216.66 during regular trading, down from a prior close of $221.30. Primary catalyst: hotter-than-expected September CPI data reignited Fed rate-hike fears, raising borrowing costs for AI infrastructure buildouts.