D-Wave Quantum's quarterly results carry outsized weight because the company remains a high-valuation, pre-profit quantum computing pioneer whose stock has been among the most volatile in the sector. After a dramatic 2025 rally, shares retreated sharply in 2026, making each earnings report a key test of whether commercial demand can justify investor expectations. The report matters beyond the headline figures: investors are watching whether system sales, recurring cloud revenue, and a growing pipeline can translate into a credible path toward profitability. With the broader quantum industry consolidating and competitors raising their own guidance, D-Wave Quantum's ability to sustain momentum in bookings and revenue recognition has become central to the investment thesis. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
D-Wave Quantum reported revenue of $4.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2026 ended September 30, 2026, an increase of 21% from $3.7 million in the prior-year period. Revenue slightly exceeded analyst estimates, but the company posted a net loss of $48.2 million, or $0.13 per share, wider than the consensus expectation of roughly $0.10 per share. Notably, the loss narrowed sharply from $0.41 per share a year earlier, though much of that improvement reflected the absence of a prior-year non-cash warrant remeasurement charge rather than operational gains.
On a GAAP basis, gross profit was $2.4 million with a gross margin of 52.9%, down from 71.4% a year earlier. Revenue composition shifted toward QCaaS subscriptions, which grew 56% to $2.2 million, and professional services, which rose 318% to $2.0 million, while systems and other revenue declined. From what I see, the shift in revenue mix highlights both opportunities and margin pressures ahead.
D-Wave Quantum shares declined roughly 8% following the report, reflecting investor disappointment over the wider-than-expected loss and the quarter's softer bookings figure. The drop partially reversed a pre-earnings rally that had been fueled by a rival's raised guidance and renewed enthusiasm across the quantum computing space. Analysts noted a tension between trailing results and leading indicators: while revenue beat estimates and the net loss narrowed, quarterly bookings fell and the backlog shrank, suggesting the company may be consuming contracted work faster than it is replenishing it. The market's reaction underscored how sensitive this high-multiple, still-unprofitable name remains to any sign that commercial momentum is cooling, even when headline financials appear to improve.
The immediate focus turns to the fourth quarter, where the timing of system deliveries will heavily influence revenue. D-Wave Quantum expects to deliver a system to Florida Atlantic University in the fourth quarter, with a substantial portion of that revenue recognized upon delivery. Analysts estimate the company will need a sizable fourth-quarter revenue figure, in the range of roughly $32 million, to meet full-year 2026 expectations.
Beyond the near term, investors should watch whether the company's sales pipeline, which management said grew more than 75% sequentially, converts into actual bookings. Margins also deserve attention: the shift toward lower-margin professional services compressed gross margin, and investors will be looking for signs that system sales and higher-margin cloud subscriptions rebalance the mix.
Finally, the company's access to up to $100 million in CHIPS and Science Act funding remains milestone-based, so any progress on those conditions could serve as a catalyst. D-Wave Quantum's roadmap targets a 17-qubit gate-model system with orders for 2027 delivery, and execution on that timeline will be closely monitored as the competitive quantum landscape continues to evolve. I’m watching this closely as the next few quarters should clarify whether the pipeline converts effectively.
In my own process, I frequently rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to cross-check sector trends and identify comparable names in quantum computing. This helps surface potential opportunities or risks that might not be obvious from earnings alone, especially when evaluating high-volatility names like QBTS.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
The RSI Indicator for QBTS moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 27 of the 28 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 56 of 61 cases where QBTS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QBTS just turned positive on November 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where QBTS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 33 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
Following a +26.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QBTS advanced for three days, in 167 of 198 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
QBTS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QBTS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The Aroon Indicator for QBTS entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.743) is normal, around the industry mean (-6.197). P/E Ratio (-15.257) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.670). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. QBTS's P/S Ratio (476.190) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (51.774).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. QBTS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QBTS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry ComputerProcessingHardware