GET DAILY SIGNALSQuality vs. Momentum: Invesco's XMHQ and XMMO Compared
Key Takeaways
- XMHQ and XMMO both draw from the S&P MidCap 400 universe, but they apply fundamentally different filters: XMHQ screens for "quality" while XMMO targets "momentum."
- XMHQ offers more balanced sector exposure (led by Industrials, Information Technology, Healthcare, and Financials), while XMMO is heavily concentrated in Industrials at roughly 43% of assets.
- XMHQ is the cheaper fund with a 0.25% net expense ratio, versus 0.34%–0.35% for XMMO, giving the quality fund a cost advantage.
- XMMO has historically carried higher volatility and a higher beta relative to the broader market, reflecting its trend-following tilt.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: XMHQ is the preferred choice based on cost efficiency, diversification, and lower risk exposure.
Setting the Stage for Two Mid-Cap ETFs
Both XMHQ and XMMO are mid-cap exchange-traded funds managed by Invesco and drawn from the same S&P MidCap 400 index. They do not compete head-to-head in the strictest sense; instead, they offer alternative factor approaches aimed at similar investor objectives of capturing U.S. mid-cap equity returns through rules-based screens. XMHQ selects companies with strong quality characteristics, while XMMO favors stocks showing persistent price momentum. For investors weighing value-style quality against trend-following momentum, this comparison highlights the structural differences, sector exposure, and relative positioning of each fund in the current market environment.
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) Overview
XMHQ is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index. The index selects a subset of S&P MidCap 400 constituents that exhibit high quality, typically measured through metrics such as return on equity, earnings stability, and balance-sheet strength. The fund launched in December 2006 and holds approximately 80 to 82 securities, providing meaningful diversification across company-specific risk. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Top holdings include FTI (TechnipFMC), ILMN (Illumina), MEDP (Medpace), NVT (nVent Electric), MANH (Manhattan Associates), EXEL (Exelixis), and UTHR (United Therapeutics). Sector allocation is comparatively broad, led by Industrials (roughly 29%), followed by Information Technology and Healthcare (about 17% each), Financials (around 16%), and Consumer Cyclical (near 9–10%). The fund carries a net expense ratio of 0.25%, among the lowest in its mid-cap category, and rebalances according to the index provider's scheduled quality-screen methodology.
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) Overview
XMMO is also a passively managed fund, tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. That index holds the securities within the S&P MidCap 400 with the highest momentum scores, based on recent price performance and trend persistence. Launched in March 2005, XMMO maintains roughly 77 to 81 holdings, but its weighting scheme skews heavily toward stocks demonstrating strong upward trends.
Top holdings include CW (Curtiss-Wright), ATI (ATI Inc.), FTI (TechnipFMC), NVT (nVent Electric), WWD (Woodward), RGLD (Royal Gold), and MKSI (MKS Instruments). Sector exposure is far more concentrated than XMHQ: Industrials dominate at about 43% of the portfolio, with Information Technology (around 12–13%), Energy (about 8%), and Healthcare (about 8%) trailing well behind. The fund's net expense ratio is 0.34%–0.35%, higher than XMHQ's, reflecting the more dynamic nature of momentum rebalancing.
Industry and Thematic Backdrop
Both funds are heavily exposed to the industrial sector and the broader mid-cap economic cycle, making them sensitive to manufacturing activity, capital expenditure trends, and reshoring dynamics. In recent market cycles, mid-cap industrials and defense-adjacent names have benefited from infrastructure investment and supply-chain reconfiguration, which has supported several shared top holdings such as Curtiss-Wright, nVent Electric, and TechnipFMC. Interest-rate expectations also matter: quality-focused funds tend to weather tighter financial conditions better, while momentum strategies can amplify swings during rapid sector rotation. Energy, healthcare, and technology represent secondary but meaningful drivers for both ETFs, and any shift in those sectors' earnings momentum can materially affect relative positioning.
Performance and Positioning Comparison
Over recent weeks and months, XMMO's momentum tilt has historically translated into stronger upside during trending markets but deeper drawdowns when sentiment reverses. Its higher beta and annualized volatility relative to the broader market reflect this behavior. XMHQ, by contrast, has generally exhibited lower volatility and a more defensive profile, with returns driven by consistent fundamental quality rather than price momentum. The two funds share several top holdings, so their performance can diverge primarily through sector concentration and weighting differences — XMMO's outsized Industrials stake versus XMHQ's more balanced mix across Industrials, Technology, Healthcare, and Financials. In environments favoring broad-based, quality-driven gains, XMHQ's diversification and lower cost have supported steadier relative positioning. From what I see, this pattern holds up when cross-checked against broader market data.
Exploring with Tickeron’s AI Screener
Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. I use it regularly to scan thousands of stocks and ETFs with customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. It surfaces trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities far more efficiently than manual screening, which has been useful in comparing funds like these.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
XMHQ's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for XMHQ turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where XMHQ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where XMHQ's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 24 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on XMHQ as a result. In 78 of 90 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
XMHQ moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for XMHQ crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 27, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +1.07% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XMHQ advanced for three days, in 260 of 310 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 229 of 277 cases where XMHQ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 83%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where XMHQ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
XMHQ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Category MidCapBlend
Advertisement