Go to the list of all blogs
Allana's Avatar
published in Blogs
Jul 28, 2026
SPY vs VOO: Comparing Two Leading S&P 500 ETFs

SPY vs VOO: Comparing Two Leading S&P 500 ETFs

Key Takeaways

  • Both SPY and VOO track the S&P 500 Index, providing nearly identical exposure to large-cap U.S. equities across all sectors.
  • VOO offers a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to SPY at 0.0945%, resulting in lower ongoing costs for long-term investors.
  • Each ETF holds approximately 500 securities, with highly similar top holdings including Microsoft, Apple, NVIDIA, Amazon, and Alphabet, reflecting the market-cap weighted nature of the underlying index.
  • SPY generally exhibits higher trading volume and tighter bid-ask spreads, enhancing liquidity for short-term or institutional trading strategies.
  • Sector allocations for both funds are dominated by information technology, followed by financials, health care, and consumer discretionary, with minimal differentiation in exposure profiles.
  • Structural differences center on issuer-specific operational efficiencies and share creation/redemption mechanisms rather than investment objectives or risk factors.

Introduction

The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) represent two of the most prominent vehicles for gaining exposure to the S&P 500 Index. These ETFs compete directly for investors seeking broad large-cap U.S. equity market participation. Their structural similarities make them natural alternatives, with differences primarily in cost structure and liquidity characteristics that influence suitability across varying investment horizons and trading styles. In the current environment of concentrated market leadership and evolving fee sensitivity, understanding these distinctions supports more informed allocation decisions within core equity portfolios. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the two compare across key metrics.

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Overview

The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses. It holds approximately 500 securities selected and weighted according to the index methodology. Top holdings typically include Microsoft, Apple, NVIDIA, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector allocations mirror the S&P 500, with the largest weights in information technology, financials, health care, and consumer discretionary. The fund carries an expense ratio of 0.0945%. As a unit investment trust structure, it maintains full replication with periodic rebalancing aligned to index changes. SPY is distinguished by its established liquidity profile and high average daily trading volume.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Overview

The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the S&P 500 Index before fees and expenses. It maintains a portfolio of approximately 500 holdings using full replication. Top positions align closely with those of the index, featuring Microsoft, Apple, NVIDIA, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector breakdowns emphasize information technology as the dominant exposure, followed by financials, health care, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio stands at 0.03%. The fund employs an open-end structure that supports efficient creation and redemption processes. VOO is noted for its cost efficiency within the S&P 500 ETF category. From what I see, this lower cost structure stands out when evaluating long-term holding periods.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The S&P 500 Index underpins both ETFs and reflects broad exposure to large-capitalization U.S. companies across cyclical and defensive sectors. Recent market cycles have featured leadership from technology and growth-oriented names alongside resilience in financials and health care. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories, corporate earnings trends, and capital allocation toward artificial intelligence and digital transformation continue to influence sector rotations. Regulatory developments around antitrust scrutiny in technology and evolving fiscal policy add layers of consideration for large-cap equity strategies. Both ETFs provide diversified access without thematic or active overlays, positioning them as core holdings amid ongoing shifts in economic conditions and investor preferences for broad market beta.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, SPY and VOO have delivered closely aligned returns driven by identical underlying index exposure. Minor differences arise primarily from the expense ratio gap, with VOO retaining a slight long-term advantage. Liquidity characteristics favor SPY during periods of elevated trading activity, while both funds exhibit comparable volatility reflective of the S&P 500's composition. Relative positioning remains stable across earnings seasons and sector rotations, with neither fund introducing meaningful deviations through active management or leverage. Investors evaluating these vehicles often weigh trading frequency and holding period against the modest cost differential when determining allocation within equity sleeves. One thing that stands out is how the liquidity edge of SPY can matter for more active strategies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest preference to the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) owing to its lower expense ratio and comparable diversification profile. The cost efficiency supports marginally superior net returns over extended holding periods while maintaining equivalent sector momentum exposure and risk characteristics. In probabilistic terms, this edge becomes more pronounced for buy-and-hold strategies, whereas short-term traders may continue to value the liquidity attributes associated with the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY).

Using Tickeron’s AI Screener

In my research process, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to scan ETFs and stocks using customizable filters for patterns, fundamentals, and performance metrics. It helps streamline comparisons like the one between SPY and VOO by highlighting relevant data points quickly and efficiently. This approach has proven useful for refining allocation ideas without replacing core analysis.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: SPY, VOO

Contributor

Allana's AvatarAllana|Expert

Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.


SPY in upward trend: 10-day moving average moved above 50-day moving average on August 05, 2026

The 10-day moving average for SPY crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on August 05, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on July 31, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on SPY as a result. In of 74 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SPY just turned positive on August 03, 2026. Looking at past instances where SPY's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 51 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

SPY moved above its 50-day moving average on July 31, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SPY advanced for three days, in of 366 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for SPY moved out of overbought territory on August 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 46 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 7 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SPY declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

SPY broke above its upper Bollinger Band on August 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for SPY entered a downward trend on July 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), Eli Lilly & Co (NYSE:LLY).

Industry description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the S&P 500® Index. The trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by holding a portfolio of the common stocks that are included in the index (the “Portfolio”), with the weight of each stock in the Portfolio substantially corresponding to the weight of such stock in the index.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF ETF is 162.23B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 5.24B to 5.46T. NVDA holds the highest valuation in this group at 5.46T. The lowest valued company is EPAM at 5.24B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF ETF was 1%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 15%. MNST experienced the highest price growth at 98%, while TPR experienced the biggest fall at -21%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF ETF was -20%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was -9% and the average quarterly volume growth was -41%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 53
P/E Growth Rating: 51
Price Growth Rating: 42
SMR Rating: 50
Profit Risk Rating: 58
Seasonality Score: -31 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
SPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category LargeBlend

Profile
Details
Category
Large Blend
Address
PDR Services, 86 Trinity PlaceNew York
Phone
N/A
Web
www.spdrs.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Uber (UBER) reports Q4 2025 earnings on February 4, 2026, with consensus estimates of $0.78 EPS and $14.32 billion in revenue, up about 20% year over year.
Qualcomm’s Q1 FY2026 report, covering the period ended December 28, 2025, arrives amid a pivotal shift in the semiconductor landscape. While handset growth moderates, the company is expanding in automotive, IoT, and AI-enabled devices.
UBS Group AG reports Q4 2025 earnings on February 4, 2026, with consensus EPS ranging $0.25–$0.67 and revenue around $11.62 billion, down YoY. HSBC Holdings plc reports Q4 earnings on February 25, 2026, with consensus EPS ~$1.57; Q3 showed resilient net interest income despite $1.4B in legal provisions.
Boston Scientific’s Q4 caps a transformative year, driven by ~15.5% organic growth from WATCHMAN, FARAPULSE electrophysiology, and MedSurg expansions. As a leader in minimally invasive devices, BSX’s results set the benchmark against Medtronic and Stryker—diversified medtech giants navigating tariffs, procedural rebounds, and innovation.
Datadog (DDOG) has come under pressure in recent sessions as volatility across the software sector weighs on sentiment ahead of earnings. Trading in the $108–120 range following a pullback from highs near $200, the stock reflects a disconnect between near-term market caution and resilient underlying fundamentals.
Starbucks shares have shown renewed strength in recent trading, rebounding from earlier lows within a 52-week range of $75.50 to $117.46. The recovery reflects improving comparable sales trends and a return to transaction growth, suggesting early progress from operational initiatives aimed at reconnecting with customers.
DoorDash holds a Strong Buy consensus from 33 analysts, with an average 12-month price target of $280.82, implying more than 40% upside from recent trading levels.
Amazon’s Q4 report capped a strong year marked by accelerating cloud growth, steady retail execution, and expanding advertising profitability. The results reinforced Amazon’s positioning as a core beneficiary of enterprise AI demand, particularly through AWS, while highlighting improving operating leverage across the broader business.
ConocoPhillips reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.02, below consensus of $1.08, driven by weaker realized commodity prices.
ICE reported Q4 2025 net revenues of $2.5 billion, up 8% year-over-year, capping 20 consecutive years of record annual revenues at $9.9 billion.
Eli Lilly’s Q4 results highlight explosive growth from GLP-1 therapies, cementing leadership in obesity and diabetes. The company’s strong revenue beat and robust 2026 guidance illustrate high-growth pharma dynamics. Johnson & Johnson, in contrast, exemplifies a diversified healthcare strategy, combining pharmaceuticals, MedTech, and consumer health for steady expansion.
Eli Lilly (LLY), AbbVie (ABBV), and Merck (MRK) all reported strong Q4 2025 earnings, but the market reacted differently to each, reflecting variations in growth profiles, product concentration, and sector dynamics. AbbVie delivered Q4 revenue of $16.62 billion, up 10% year-over-year, with full-year revenue reaching $61.2 billion, an 8.6% increase. Adjusted EPS came in at $2.71, surpassing consensus, though shares dipped following the report amid ongoing Humira concerns
Novo Nordisk (NVO) reported Q4 2025 EPS of $1.02, surpassing estimates of $0.92, with revenue of $12.53B vs $11.99B expected. Full-year 2025 sales rose 10% at constant exchange rates (CER) to DKK 309B, but 2026 guidance anticipates a 5–13% decline at CER due to pricing pressures. Novartis (NVS) posted Q4 core EPS of $2.03, beating $1.99 estimates; net sales of $13.34B slightly missed consensus. FY sales grew 8%, with core EPS up 17% to $8.98.
MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group) posted Q3 FY2026 profits of ¥1.81 trillion, up 3.7% YoY, on track for its full-year target of ¥2.1 trillion. HSBC is set to report Q4 FY2025 earnings on Feb 25, 2026, with consensus EPS around $1.60; recent quarters showed resilient net interest income (NII) supported by Asia wealth growth.
Gogo shares continue to trade near 52-week lows around $4, weighed down by competitive threats from Starlink and slower-than-anticipated AVANCE system upgrades. William Blair downgraded the stock to Market Perform in December 2025, citing leverage concerns and intensifying rivalry in in-flight connectivity.
Quantum Computing Inc. completed a $110 million acquisition of Luminar Semiconductor on February 2, significantly strengthening its photonics and manufacturing capabilities. Shares have traded with elevated volatility, peaking near $12.70 in mid-January before retreating to the $9 range amid heavy volume.
ERII shares have remained resilient, trading near $15.47 ahead of Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings scheduled for February 25, 2026. Q3 2025 results exceeded expectations, with revenue of $32 million and EPS of $0.07, despite year-over-year declines tied to project timing.
Golar LNG (GLNG) has remained resilient in recent trading, hovering near the top of its 52-week range as investor interest in floating LNG infrastructure continues to build. The stock is underpinned by a deep FLNG order backlog, steady production from operating assets, and improving financial flexibility.
Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) has experienced pronounced swings in recent weeks, touching multiyear lows before staging a sharp recovery. The stock continues to trade within a wide 52-week range, closely tied to the value of its Charter Communications stake and investor expectations around the proposed merger.
Apollo Global Management (APO), a leading alternative asset manager, reports Q4 and full-year 2025 results on February 9, 2026, before the market opens. The firm has delivered a year of strong growth, with AUM expanding on record inflows exceeding $200 billion and origination surpassing $300 billion.