The GEO Group operates secure facilities, processing centers, and community reentry programs, mainly under contracts with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Its results draw attention because demand ties directly to federal immigration policy, contract awards, and facility utilization. Over the past year, the company has brought several idle facilities online and won a substantial number of new contracts, fueling fast revenue growth. This quarter’s print is notable because it shows whether that expansion is producing lasting profitability and whether momentum can continue as prior activations start to compare against a higher base. Guidance updates and moves on capital allocation, such as share repurchases and asset sales, add further context.
For the third quarter of 2026, GEO posted revenue of approximately $761.1 million, a 12% rise from $682.3 million in the same quarter last year and a new company record. Net income attributable to GEO operations reached $49.2 million, or $0.37 per diluted share, compared with $1.24 per diluted share a year earlier. That prior-year figure included a roughly $228 million gain from the sale of the Lawton, Oklahoma facility, which inflated the comparison.
On an adjusted basis, net income climbed 48% to $51.8 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, ahead of the consensus estimate of $0.35. Adjusted EBITDA advanced 21% to a record $145.3 million from $120.1 million a year ago. Profitability exceeded expectations, yet reported revenue fell a bit short of some analyst forecasts, highlighting a more mixed picture on the top line even as the bottom line performed well.
Management lifted its full-year 2026 adjusted EBITDA guidance to a range of $568 million to $573 million from the prior $550 million to $560 million and set full-year revenue guidance at $2.975 billion to $3.025 billion.
Shares of GEO rose roughly 3.8% right after the third-quarter release, reflecting a generally positive response to the earnings beat and higher profitability guidance. Investor focus remains on the strength of the ICE contract pipeline, record adjusted EBITDA, and the company’s capital-return program. At the same time, the modest revenue miss and a slower year-over-year growth pace moderated some enthusiasm. The report underscored a company that is expanding profitability faster than revenue, with sentiment balancing solid operational results against questions about the pace of future top-line growth.
Management indicated that fourth-quarter 2026 revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance exceeds third-quarter levels, setting up another potential record period. The forward narrative, however, depends heavily on catalysts expected in 2027.
Investors will track the activation of four new ICE facilities at Big Horn, Rivers, and the Big Spring Complex, which together should add meaningful incremental annualized revenue. The planned transition of the Graceville and Bay facilities in Florida, set for July 1, 2027, represents another important driver. Growth in the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP) and a shift toward higher-priced monitoring devices could further support the electronic monitoring segment, which returned to year-over-year growth this quarter.
On the balance sheet, the sale of the Adelanto complex for $950 million in gross proceeds helped redeem higher-cost secured notes, leaving about $625 million of unsecured debt and roughly $600 million in liquidity. Management has increased its share repurchase authorization to $1.25 billion and signaled potential sales of up to four additional facilities before year-end 2026. Key risks include the timing of federal contract awards, possible pricing changes, and margin pressures as new facilities ramp. I’m watching occupancy trends, contract signings, and execution on capital returns closely in the quarters ahead. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
I often rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener when analyzing names like GEO. It lets me filter across technical patterns, fundamentals, and AI-driven signals to surface comparable ideas quickly and stay on top of shifting sector conditions without spending hours on manual screens.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
GEO moved below its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 27 of 35 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 44 of 61 cases where GEO's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GEO as a result. In 60 of 94 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GEO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
The Aroon Indicator for GEO entered a downward trend on November 02, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where GEO's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 25 of 30 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for GEO just turned positive on November 03, 2026. Looking at past instances where GEO's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 44 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
Following a +3.33% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GEO advanced for three days, in 230 of 277 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
GEO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. GEO’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 68, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 54 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.389) is normal, around the industry mean (3.026). P/E Ratio (12.805) is within average values for comparable stocks, (1.906). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.337) is also within normal values, averaging (5.749). Dividend Yield (0.036) settles around the average of (0.316) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.511) is also within normal values, averaging (2.085).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a real estate investment trust
Industry MiscellaneousCommercialServices