The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF is a passively managed, non-diversified exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. The index covers uranium mining, nuclear power generation, nuclear facility construction and engineering, and related equipment and services. The fund normally invests at least 80% of total assets in index securities and carries a net expense ratio of 0.52%.
NLR holds roughly 30 securities. Largest positions include Cameco (CCJ), Constellation Energy (CEG), BWX Technologies (BWXT), Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG), and PG&E (PCG), alongside uranium developers such as NexGen Energy (NXE), Denison Mines (DNN), Uranium Energy (UEC), and Centrus Energy (LEU). Energy-related uranium and fuel-cycle companies represent close to half of assets, utilities about 30%, and industrials most of the remainder. That mix shapes performance: utilities provide cash-flow ballast, while miners, enrichment names, and advanced reactor developers are more sensitive to uranium prices and risk appetite. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
From a mid-July close of $104.20, NLR advanced to $118.10 by mid-August, a gain of about 13.3%. The rally was not a steady grind: the fund bottomed near the $102–$104 area and then recovered in a series of sharp daily moves, consistent with sentiment normalization after an oversold stretch.
Over the trailing three months, the picture is different. From a mid-May close near $129.68, the fund is down roughly 8.9%, meaning the 30-day rebound has retraced only part of a larger spring pullback—a volatile, V-shaped short-term recovery set against a still-negative quarterly trend.
The rebound reflected a cluster of policy and market developments. In late July, China's State Council approved four nuclear power projects totaling eight reactors, with estimated investment above 170 billion yuan, reinforcing global reactor demand. Around the same time, the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust resumed physical uranium purchases—50,000 pounds on July 21 and 100,000 pounds on each of July 29 and 30—tightening spot-market liquidity and supporting uranium-linked equities.
The U.S. administration announced a civilian nuclear cooperation arrangement with Saudi Arabia on July 22, signaling that even hydrocarbon-rich economies are adding nuclear capacity. In mid-August, TerraPower's engagement with South Korean suppliers revived investor focus on small modular reactor (SMR) orders and backlog visibility.
Commodity conditions helped as well. Uranium spot prices held near the mid-$80s per pound while long-term contract prices climbed to roughly $95 per pound, their highest in about 18 years. Among holdings, cash-generating utilities such as Constellation Energy (CEG) and Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG) steadied the portfolio, while higher-beta miners and SMR developers led the bounce.
The quarterly decline was primarily a valuation and sentiment unwind rather than a deterioration in nuclear fundamentals. NLR peaked in late January 2026, and selling accelerated from mid-May as investors questioned the pace and payoff of AI-related capital spending. Nuclear and uranium equities—heavily bid during the 2023–2025 rally—repriced as momentum faded.
Within the portfolio, the damage was uneven. Pre-revenue reactor developers such as Oklo (OKLO) and NuScale Power (SMR) fell hardest, while established power producers such as Constellation Energy (CEG) held up better. Uranium miners also weakened even as the commodity stayed firm: spot uranium remained range-bound in the mid-$80s, while long-term contract prices continued to climb. That detachment between equity prices and the underlying commodity is characteristic of a sentiment-driven de-rating.
Constructive news—including a U.S. Department of Energy conditional loan commitment of $17.5 billion for long-lead components for up to 10 large reactors and Walmart's first nuclear power purchase agreement—did not stop the selloff, but it preserved the structural demand narrative.
In my research process, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to scan for securities matching specific sector criteria like uranium exposure or volatility metrics. It helps narrow the universe of names quickly using technical indicators, fundamentals, and AI-generated signals, which proved useful when reviewing NLR holdings and peers. This structured approach supports a more data-driven view of how individual components are behaving within the broader theme.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
My name is Jimmy, and I’m a financial analyst focused on identifying compelling opportunities across the ETF market. Each day, I analyze hundreds of ETFs to uncover potential trading and investment opportunities using a broad range of market factors. For short-term trading, I rely heavily on technical analysis, including price channels, momentum indicators, support and resistance levels, trend patterns, and other market signals. At the same time, I dedicate significant attention to evaluating ETFs from a long-term investment perspective. My objective is to build a well-balanced ETF portfolio that combines core investment holdings with more tactical and speculative positions. The goal is to create a portfolio that can participate effectively in market rallies while also remaining resilient during periods of volatility and market corrections.
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
The 10-day moving average for NLR crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on August 14, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 13 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +3.67% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NLR advanced for three days, in 304 of 341 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
NLR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 268 of 309 cases where NLR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 87%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on NLR as a result. In 75 of 87 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NLR turned negative on September 10, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 41 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 36 of the 41 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 88%.
NLR moved below its 50-day moving average on September 11, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NLR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category NaturalResources