Key Takeaways
Analysts expect Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $2.04, down roughly 8% year-over-year, with revenue forecasted at $1.2 billion, up 25% from the prior year.
Total assets under management (AUM) projected around $934 billion, reflecting strong inflows and active origination.
Fee-related earnings remain a focus following a record $652 million in Q3 2025, up 23% YoY.
Apollo has beaten EPS estimates in three of the last four quarters, averaging an 8.6% surprise.
Key metrics to watch include management fees, spread-related earnings, and updates to the 2026 growth outlook.
Earnings Context
Apollo Global Management (APO), a leading alternative asset manager, reports Q4 and full-year 2025 results on February 9, 2026, before the market opens. The firm has delivered a year of strong growth, with AUM expanding on record inflows exceeding $200 billion and origination surpassing $300 billion. Investors are particularly focused on fee-related earnings and private credit strategies, as Apollo navigates a “higher-for-longer” interest rate environment. Performance in private credit, retirement services, and other alternatives will provide a barometer of execution in a consolidating asset management industry and inform valuation multiples for the sector.
Q4 2025 Expectations
Consensus estimates call for adjusted EPS of $2.04, down about 8% YoY, with revenue expected to rise 25% to $1.2 billion. Total AUM is projected at roughly $934 billion, up from $908 billion at the end of Q3, supported by strong inflows and market appreciation.
In Q3 2025, Apollo delivered adjusted EPS of $2.17, beating estimates by 14%. Fee-related earnings reached $652 million, up 23% YoY, with management fees increasing 22%. Investors will monitor continued strength in fee-generating AUM ($685 billion in Q3) and spread-related earnings from credit deployments. The company previously guided for 15–20% growth in fee-related earnings for 2025, with potential updates for full-year 2026.
Market Sentiment
Heading into the report, investor sentiment is cautiously optimistic. Apollo has delivered three EPS beats in the last four quarters, with average post-earnings price moves ranging from 0.5% to 5%. Positive surprises tend to generate upside, supported by the firm’s strong AUM trajectory. Key risks include higher expenses offsetting inflows or weaker-than-expected performance fees. Preliminary Q4 investment income estimates of $325 million suggest stability, but fee and spread-related earnings will remain the focal point.
Forward Outlook and Key Factors
Investors should watch for updated guidance on fee-related earnings growth and spread income, particularly across Apollo’s $723 billion credit AUM as of Q3 2025. Continued inflows into private credit and retirement services will be crucial, as the firm targets surpassing $1 trillion in AUM amid AI-driven infrastructure demand and supportive fiscal conditions.
Analyst forecasts for Q1 2026 call for EPS of $2.13 (up 17% YoY), with full-year 2026 growth expected around 15%. Key considerations include cost trends, margin expansion from scale, and deployment pace in a potentially easing rate environment. Competitive dynamics, including peer M&A activity and regulatory shifts in private markets, could influence performance. Apollo’s focus on perpetual capital strategies positions the firm for durable revenue streams, but successful origination, capital deployment, and client retention will be critical for sustaining growth.
Tickeron AI trading bot
Disclaimers and Limitations
The RSI Indicator for APO moved out of oversold territory on June 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In of the 26 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at .
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The 50-day moving average for APO moved above the 200-day moving average on June 22, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where APO advanced for three days, in of 360 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
APO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on June 24, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on APO as a result. In of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for APO turned negative on June 24, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
APO moved below its 50-day moving average on June 24, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for APO crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on June 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where APO declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 81, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. APO’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.202) is normal, around the industry mean (4.360). APO has a moderately high P/E Ratio (85.038) as compared to the industry average of (25.885). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.717) is also within normal values, averaging (1.356). APO has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.015) as compared to the industry average of (0.094). P/S Ratio (2.546) is also within normal values, averaging (17.519).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a provider of global alternative asset management services
Industry InvestmentManagers