These two Vanguard ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent complementary halves of a global equity allocation. VEA provides developed international exposure, while VTI provides total U.S. market coverage. Comparing them helps investors understand how diversification, sector concentration, and geographic positioning shape long-term returns and risk. For anyone deciding where to overweight between domestic and foreign developed equities, this ETF comparison clarifies the structural differences in sector exposure, fund performance, and relative positioning across recent market cycles. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the two line up on key metrics.
VEA is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, a market-capitalization-weighted benchmark of roughly 3,900 large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks from developed markets outside the United States. The fund uses a full-replication approach, holding each stock in approximately the same proportion as the index.
Its top holdings include Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, ASML, HSBC, Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Royal Bank of Canada, Nestlé, and Shell, though no single position typically exceeds about 2–3% of assets. By sector, financials (roughly 24%), industrials (about 18%), and technology (about 15–17%) lead the portfolio, followed by healthcare, consumer discretionary, and basic materials. Geographically, Europe represents roughly half of the fund, with the Pacific region and Canada making up most of the remainder. VEA carries a 0.03% expense ratio, has a dividend yield near 2.7%, and has generally exhibited a beta below 1.0 relative to the broad U.S. market.
VTI is a passively managed fund that tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index, offering exposure to virtually the entire investable U.S. equity market across all market capitalizations. It holds roughly 3,500 stocks spanning mega-, large-, mid-, and small-cap companies, weighted by market capitalization.
Top positions include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, AVGO, META, TSLA, and BRK.B. Information technology dominates at roughly 36% of the portfolio, with consumer discretionary, industrials, financials, and healthcare each contributing roughly 9–14%. The top ten holdings account for about a third of fund assets, reflecting meaningful concentration in mega-cap technology names. VTI also carries a 0.03% expense ratio and a dividend yield closer to 1.2–1.4%, with a beta near 1.0 to the U.S. market. Running the holdings through Tickeron’s AI tools confirmed the heavy tech weighting.
The current environment highlights a familiar tension: U.S. large-cap technology leadership versus broadening international and value-oriented exposure. VTI's fortunes remain tied to semiconductor, artificial intelligence, and mega-cap earnings cycles, as well as to interest rate expectations that influence growth-stock valuations. VEA, by contrast, is more sensitive to European and Japanese industrial activity, global banking profitability, currency movements, and commodity-linked sectors such as energy and materials.
Capital flows in recent cycles have shifted between U.S. and international equities as investors reassess valuations, with developed international markets often trading at lower valuation multiples than their U.S. counterparts. Regulatory developments, central-bank policy divergence, and geopolitical risks in Europe and Asia also weigh on VEA's constituents, while U.S. fiscal and monetary policy remain key drivers for VTI.
In recent weeks and months, VTI has continued to draw strength from its concentration in large-cap technology, which has been a persistent leadership group. VEA has participated in global equity gains but has been more influenced by rotation into financials, industrials, and value-oriented sectors, as well as by the performance of European and Japanese markets. As a result, VTI has tended to deliver stronger returns during U.S. growth-led rallies, while VEA has offered a lower-beta, higher-yield profile that can cushion relative drawdowns when mega-cap technology consolidates.
From a volatility standpoint, VEA's broader geographic and sector diversification has historically produced slightly lower volatility and a smaller maximum drawdown than concentrated U.S. technology exposure. The relative positioning of these two funds ultimately reflects a choice between concentrated U.S. growth leadership and diversified developed-market value and cyclical exposure.
I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener when comparing ETFs like these. It lets me quickly filter thousands of funds by technical patterns, fundamentals, volatility, and performance metrics, helping surface ideas and confirm relative positioning without manual effort. The tool has become a regular part of my research workflow for spotting how different exposures stack up.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for VEA turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where VEA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 49 of 56 cases where VEA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
Following a +1.20% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VEA advanced for three days, in 266 of 329 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
VEA moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for VEA crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VEA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The Aroon Indicator for VEA entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category ForeignLargeBlend