Go to the list of all blogs
M. Benett's Avatar
published in Blogs
Oct 28, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
VEA vs VTI: Contrasting Developed International Exposure with the Broad U.S. Market

VEA vs VTI: Contrasting Developed International Exposure with the Broad U.S. Market

Key Takeaways

  • Different universes: VEA owns developed-market stocks outside the U.S., while VTI owns the entire U.S. equity market.
  • Breadth is similar, concentration is not: Both funds hold roughly 3,500–3,900 stocks, but VTI is far more top-heavy, with about a third of assets in its ten largest positions.
  • Cost parity: Each fund carries a 0.03% expense ratio, among the lowest available in the ETF industry.
  • Distinct sector tilts: VEA skews toward financials and industrials, while VTI is dominated by information technology.
  • Different risk profiles: VTI has historically tracked the U.S. market more closely (beta near 1.0), while VEA has exhibited lower beta and a higher dividend yield.

Why These Two ETFs Matter for a Global Allocation

These two Vanguard ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent complementary halves of a global equity allocation. VEA provides developed international exposure, while VTI provides total U.S. market coverage. Comparing them helps investors understand how diversification, sector concentration, and geographic positioning shape long-term returns and risk. For anyone deciding where to overweight between domestic and foreign developed equities, this ETF comparison clarifies the structural differences in sector exposure, fund performance, and relative positioning across recent market cycles. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the two line up on key metrics.

Understanding VEA’s Developed-Markets Focus

VEA is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, a market-capitalization-weighted benchmark of roughly 3,900 large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks from developed markets outside the United States. The fund uses a full-replication approach, holding each stock in approximately the same proportion as the index.

Its top holdings include Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, ASML, HSBC, Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Royal Bank of Canada, Nestlé, and Shell, though no single position typically exceeds about 2–3% of assets. By sector, financials (roughly 24%), industrials (about 18%), and technology (about 15–17%) lead the portfolio, followed by healthcare, consumer discretionary, and basic materials. Geographically, Europe represents roughly half of the fund, with the Pacific region and Canada making up most of the remainder. VEA carries a 0.03% expense ratio, has a dividend yield near 2.7%, and has generally exhibited a beta below 1.0 relative to the broad U.S. market.

Breaking Down VTI’s Total U.S. Market Coverage

VTI is a passively managed fund that tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index, offering exposure to virtually the entire investable U.S. equity market across all market capitalizations. It holds roughly 3,500 stocks spanning mega-, large-, mid-, and small-cap companies, weighted by market capitalization.

Top positions include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, AVGO, META, TSLA, and BRK.B. Information technology dominates at roughly 36% of the portfolio, with consumer discretionary, industrials, financials, and healthcare each contributing roughly 9–14%. The top ten holdings account for about a third of fund assets, reflecting meaningful concentration in mega-cap technology names. VTI also carries a 0.03% expense ratio and a dividend yield closer to 1.2–1.4%, with a beta near 1.0 to the U.S. market. Running the holdings through Tickeron’s AI tools confirmed the heavy tech weighting.

The Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The current environment highlights a familiar tension: U.S. large-cap technology leadership versus broadening international and value-oriented exposure. VTI's fortunes remain tied to semiconductor, artificial intelligence, and mega-cap earnings cycles, as well as to interest rate expectations that influence growth-stock valuations. VEA, by contrast, is more sensitive to European and Japanese industrial activity, global banking profitability, currency movements, and commodity-linked sectors such as energy and materials.

Capital flows in recent cycles have shifted between U.S. and international equities as investors reassess valuations, with developed international markets often trading at lower valuation multiples than their U.S. counterparts. Regulatory developments, central-bank policy divergence, and geopolitical risks in Europe and Asia also weigh on VEA's constituents, while U.S. fiscal and monetary policy remain key drivers for VTI.

Performance and Positioning Side by Side

In recent weeks and months, VTI has continued to draw strength from its concentration in large-cap technology, which has been a persistent leadership group. VEA has participated in global equity gains but has been more influenced by rotation into financials, industrials, and value-oriented sectors, as well as by the performance of European and Japanese markets. As a result, VTI has tended to deliver stronger returns during U.S. growth-led rallies, while VEA has offered a lower-beta, higher-yield profile that can cushion relative drawdowns when mega-cap technology consolidates.

From a volatility standpoint, VEA's broader geographic and sector diversification has historically produced slightly lower volatility and a smaller maximum drawdown than concentrated U.S. technology exposure. The relative positioning of these two funds ultimately reflects a choice between concentrated U.S. growth leadership and diversified developed-market value and cyclical exposure.

Exploring ETF Comparisons with Tickeron’s AI Screener

I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener when comparing ETFs like these. It lets me quickly filter thousands of funds by technical patterns, fundamentals, volatility, and performance metrics, helping surface ideas and confirm relative positioning without manual effort. The tool has become a regular part of my research workflow for spotting how different exposures stack up.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: VEA, VTI

VEA's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for VEA turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where VEA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 42 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 49 of 56 cases where VEA's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

Following a +1.20% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VEA advanced for three days, in 266 of 329 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

VEA moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for VEA crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VEA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

The Aroon Indicator for VEA entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Shopify Inc (NASDAQ:SHOP), SSR Mining (NASDAQ:SSRM).

Industry description

The investment seeks to track the performance of the FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index. The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to track the performance of the FTSE Developed All Cap ex U.S. Index, a market-capitalization-weighted index that is made up of approximately 3,957 common stocks of large-, mid-, and small-cap companies located in Canada and the major markets of Europe and the Pacific region. The Advisor attempts to replicate the target index by investing all, or substantially all, of its assets in the stocks that make up the index, holding each stock in approximately the same proportion as its weighting in the index.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) ETF is 30.22B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 340.99M to 213.34B. SHOP holds the highest valuation in this group at 213.34B. The lowest valued company is PERI at 340.99M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) ETF was 35%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 106%, and the average quarterly price growth was 291%. KEN experienced the highest price growth at 8%, while SSRM experienced the biggest fall at -6%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) ETF was 1%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was 11% and the average quarterly volume growth was -17%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 56
P/E Growth Rating: 57
Price Growth Rating: 53
SMR Rating: 63
Profit Risk Rating: 66
Seasonality Score: 27 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
VEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category ForeignLargeBlend

Category
Foreign Large Blend
Address
Vanguard Tax-managed FundsPo Box 2600Valley Forge
Phone
N/A
Web
www.vanguard.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
TSMX, a 2x daily leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund), rose roughly +19% over the trailing 30 days, rebounding sharply from mid-September lows. The fund seeks 200% of the daily return of TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), meaning its moves are roughly double the underlying stock's daily swings.
Contracted revenue anchor: A roughly $3.2 billion, seven-year LNG (liquefied natural gas) supply agreement with Puerto Rico has received final approval, providing multi-year cash-flow visibility if execution stays on track. Project pipeline inflection: Upcoming milestones include the Barcarena and PortoCem power plants in Brazil, a potential Gás Sul terminal restart, and optimization of the company's modular "Fast LNG" (FLNG) liquefaction fleet.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) designs central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and AI accelerators, while LRCX (Lam Research) supplies the wafer-fabrication equipment used to build advanced chips. AMD has delivered strong double-digit revenue growth on AI data-center demand, but its shares trade with elevated expectations that can trigger sharp reactions around earnings.
Origination momentum: Velocity Financial enters 2026 off record annual originations of roughly $2.7 billion (up about 48%), positioning it to keep gaining share in a fragmented investor-loan market. Credit normalization is the central watch item: Nonperforming loans fell toward the 8.5% range of portfolio unpaid principal balance (UPB), but asset quality remains the primary swing factor for earnings.
Turnaround milestone ahead: Management has pointed to reaching cash generation in 2027, making the pace of cost discipline and margin recovery the central question for the stock forecast. Fresh capital supports execution: A recently announced $45.5 million equity financing, with participation from management and a single institutional investor, strengthens the balance sheet as the company funds its transformation.
NFE closed at $5.51, down -6.13% during Tuesday's regular session, extending a slide that has pushed shares near a 52-week low. Primary catalyst: the company disclosed its Fast LNG unit is offline after a gas-turbine mechanical failure, with return to service not expected until Q4.
The central $11 target is the arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, rounded from roughly $10.75. With the stock near $2.06, reaching $11 would require an upside of more than 400%, an extremely large move.
The $23 central target is the rounded arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, which average $23.25. The latest verified price is around $9.57, meaning the target implies roughly 140% upside—a very large move.
NXH closed down -11.17% (-$0.23) to $1.83 on Oct 6, the most recent regular session, extending a steep two-day decline. Selling continued as investors digested the mutual termination of the Fathom Holdings merger and a dilutive $45.5M registered direct offering of ~16.5M shares at $2.76.
AMD is a large-cap designer of CPUs (central processing units) and GPUs (graphics processing units) competing directly with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market, while FORM is a small-cap provider of semiconductor test and measurement equipment, primarily probe cards. AMD's narrative has been driven by multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler deals, while FORM's has been powered by record revenue and sharp margin expansion tied to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand.
AMD has surged roughly 200% year to date, crossing a $1 trillion market capitalization on AI data-center demand and a "CPU renaissance" narrative. KLAC has gained about 71% year to date, supported by record process-control revenue and rapid growth in advanced packaging for AI chips.
AMD is a large-cap semiconductor designer riding explosive AI compute demand, while ENTG is a mid-cap supplier of materials and purity solutions that feed the same AI-driven chip cycle. AMD recently crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization on surging data center revenue, whereas ENTG operates at a far smaller scale (roughly $23 billion) with steadier, double-digit growth.
VELO closed Tuesday at $9.57, unchanged (+0.00%) from the prior session, with the move occurring during regular market hours. The flat close marked stabilization after Monday's -14.5% plunge, when shares fell to $9.57 from $11.20 following disclosure of CFO James Suva's departure.
The $8 target used here is a technical, publicly discussed recovery objective — not an analyst consensus — because legacy analyst price targets were set before NFE's restructuring and reverse stock split. New Fortress Energy Inc. ( NFE ) trades near $5.51, so reaching $8 implies a roughly 45% advance.
AVBP plunged -46.98% during Tuesday's regular session, closing at $15.09 versus $28.46, marking its worst single-day decline on record. The catalyst was the Phase 3 FURVENT trial of firmonertinib failing its primary endpoint—progression-free survival—in first-line EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer.
Upcoming catalyst: The company's next earnings release is estimated for November 6, 2026, which should offer fresh detail on its SKY token holdings, staking rewards, and treasury strategy. Strategic positioning: SDEV is an on-chain holding company providing public-market exposure to the Sky protocol ecosystem, with SKY as its core digital asset and a stated focus on the stablecoin economy.
Different roles in the chip ecosystem: AMAT is a materials-engineering and deposition leader, while KLAC dominates process control, inspection, and yield management. Momentum favors AMAT: AMAT shares have more than doubled this year, while KLAC has recently pulled back roughly 9% in a month on margin and execution concerns.
VEA vs VTI: Contrasting Developed International Exposure with the Broad U.S. Market