VRRM (Verra Mobility) is down more than 14% today because its Q4 results slightly missed profit expectations and, more importantly, its 2026 earnings and EBITDA guidance came in below Wall Street estimates after a big prior run‑up driven by contract wins and AI/autonomy hype.
Why VRRM fell over 14%
Q4 2025 revenue was strong at about 257–258 million (up roughly 16% year over year and above forecasts), but adjusted EPS was 0.30 versus about 0.31–0.32 expected, and EBITDA of about 101–102 million was a touch below consensus.
For 2026, management guided to adjusted EPS of about 1.32–1.38 (midpoint 1.35) and EBITDA around 410 million, both a bit under analyst expectations (EPS consensus ~1.36 and EBITDA ~416 million), signaling a slower profitability ramp than the market had priced in.
This guidance miss hit a stock that had already rallied on a 160 million Hawaii enforcement contract and a “positioned for robotaxis/AI mobility infrastructure” narrative, so the gap between high expectations and only slightly better fundamentals triggered a 14%+ “sell‑the‑news” drop to new near‑term lows.
What else is worrying investors
Commercial Services revenue is under pressure (down over 20% year over year), leverage is elevated (debt‑to‑equity around 2.6x), and the business depends in part on policy‑sensitive areas like speed‑camera funding, which recently saw new federal restrictions.
With the stock trading at a rich multiple versus current EPS, even a small earnings miss and slightly soft guidance are enough to compress the valuation sharply, especially in an environment where investors are more cautious on leveraged, policy‑exposed names.
Tickeron AI Perspective
VRRM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In of 33 cases where VRRM's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for VRRM's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. of 61 cases where VRRM's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on February 25, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on VRRM as a result. In of 99 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for VRRM turned negative on February 25, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
The 10-day moving average for VRRM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on January 27, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VRRM declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Aroon Indicator for VRRM entered a downward trend on March 04, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (8.525) is normal, around the industry mean (9.553). P/E Ratio (19.412) is within average values for comparable stocks, (44.530). VRRM's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.259). VRRM has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.026). P/S Ratio (2.718) is also within normal values, averaging (26.716).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. VRRM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. VRRM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a financial conglomerate
Industry InformationTechnologyServices