Advertisement
AA vs ALMMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AA is a Hold and ALMMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileALMMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ALMMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ALMMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ALMMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AA (@Aluminum) experienced а -8.27% price change this week, while ALMMF (@Aluminum) price change was -4.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aluminum industry was -1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +61.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
AA is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aluminum (-1.51% weekly)Aluminum is widely used in the industries like construction, packaging and automotive sector. The segment has seen increased demand for the lightweight variety in automobiles in improving fuel efficiency. The U.S. aluminum industry generates nearly $71 billion a year in direct economic impact (according to The Aluminum Association). Arconic, Inc, Alcoa Corp and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation are major aluminum companies in the U.S.
| AA | ALMMF | AA / ALMMF | |
| Capitalization | 9.51B | 26B | 37% |
| EBITDA | 2.14B | 25.9B | 8% |
| Gain YTD | -1.562 | 144.643 | -1% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.07 | 11.70 | 69% |
| Revenue | 12.9B | 240B | 5% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 34.3B | - |
| Total Debt | 2.58B | 61.5B | 4% |
AA | ALMMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALMMF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as AA (17) in the Aluminum industry. This means that ALMMF’s stock grew similarly to AA’s over the last 12 months.
ALMMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AA (74) in the Aluminum industry. This means that ALMMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AA’s over the last 12 months.
ALMMF's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as AA (44) in the Aluminum industry. This means that ALMMF’s stock grew similarly to AA’s over the last 12 months.
ALMMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as AA (46) in the Aluminum industry. This means that ALMMF’s stock grew similarly to AA’s over the last 12 months.
ALMMF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AA (100) in the Aluminum industry. This means that ALMMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AA’s over the last 12 months.
| AA | ALMMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ASA | 47.96 | 0.41 | +0.86% |
| ASA Gold AND Precious Metals Limited | |||
| SMDX | 21.78 | 0.05 | +0.23% |
| Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF | |||
| BFRZ | 26.47 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF | |||
| CLOX | 25.55 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Eldridge AAA CLO ETF | |||
| DBE | 19.34 | -0.38 | -1.91% |
| Invesco DB Energy | |||
AA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AA has been closely correlated with CENX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AA jumps, then CENX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| CENX - AA | 77% Closely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| NHYDY - AA | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| KALU - AA | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| CSTM - AA | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| NHYKF - AA | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
ALMMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ALMMF and NHYDY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALMMF and NHYDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALMMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALMMF | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| NHYDY - ALMMF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| AA - ALMMF | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| NHYKF - ALMMF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| CSTM - ALMMF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| KALU - ALMMF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||