It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABEV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBRBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABEV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ABEV (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while BRBMF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.00%.
ABEV is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
ABEV | BRBMF | ABEV / BRBMF | |
Capitalization | 39.2B | 8.69M | 451,197% |
EBITDA | 24.3B | -2.43M | -1,000,824% |
Gain YTD | -23.214 | -40.336 | 58% |
P/E Ratio | 13.26 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 79.7B | 48.8M | 163,320% |
Total Cash | 16.3B | 1.11M | 1,472,448% |
Total Debt | 3.5B | 18.9M | 18,524% |
ABEV | BRBMF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 97 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABEV's Valuation (4) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for BRBMF (100) in the null industry. This means that ABEV’s stock grew significantly faster than BRBMF’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BRBMF (100) in the null industry. This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to BRBMF’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's SMR Rating (57) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRBMF (94) in the null industry. This means that ABEV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRBMF’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BRBMF (82) in the null industry. This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to BRBMF’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as BRBMF (76) in the null industry. This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to BRBMF’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABEV has been loosely correlated with DEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABEV jumps, then DEO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ABEV | 100% | -0.92% | ||
DEO - ABEV | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
BUD - ABEV | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
CCU - ABEV | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.19% | ||
FMX - ABEV | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
PRNDY - ABEV | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.29% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRBMF and SRSG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRBMF and SRSG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRBMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BRBMF | 100% | N/A | ||
SRSG - BRBMF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ABEV - BRBMF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
AEBZY - BRBMF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
BUDFF - BRBMF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
ADWPF - BRBMF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |