Advertisement
ABNB vs CCL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABNB is a Hold and CCL is a Hold.
| ABNB | CCL | ABNB / CCL | |
| Capitalization | 100B | 31.2B | 321% |
| EBITDA | 2.82B | 7.16B | 39% |
| Gain YTD | 25.398 | -24.310 | -104% |
| P/E Ratio | 38.86 | 10.25 | 379% |
| Revenue | 13.2B | 27.3B | 48% |
| Total Cash | 12.1B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.5B | 26.2B | 10% |
CCL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ABNB | CCL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while CCL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ABNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABNB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CCL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
ABNB (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -6.46% price change this week, while CCL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -3.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
ABNB is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
CCL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (-1.36% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
Advertisement
CCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCL has been closely correlated with NCLH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCL jumps, then NCLH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCL | 100% | +1.25% | ||
| NCLH - CCL | 83% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| RCL - CCL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| VIK - CCL | 74% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| LIND - CCL | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| TNL - CCL | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
More | ||||