Advertisement
ACU vs WALD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACU is a Buy and WALD is a Hold.
ACU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ACU | WALD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 65% | 15 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while WALD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ACU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WALD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WALD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- WALD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ACU (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while WALD (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -10.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
ACU is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
WALD is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-2.95% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PSCT | 82.06 | 1.24 | +1.54% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) | |||
| VSMV | 59.75 | 0.14 | +0.24% |
| VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) | |||
| SMTH | 24.58 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| ALPS/SMITH Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) | |||
| MFUL | 22.05 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Collaborative Investment - Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) | |||
| KNOW | 12.53 | -0.09 | -0.74% |
| Fundamentals First ETF (KNOW) | |||
ACU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACU and IPAR have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACU and IPAR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACU | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| IPAR - ACU | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| EPC - ACU | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| NWL - ACU | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| WALD - ACU | 22% Poorly correlated | +7.35% | ||
| SPB - ACU | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||
WALD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WALD and SOS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WALD and SOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WALD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WALD | 100% | +7.35% | ||
| SOS - WALD | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.72% | ||
| GBTG - WALD | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AFRM - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| MAGN - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| RXT - WALD | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.62% | ||
More | ||||