Adobe (ADBE) and Autodesk (ADSK) are two of the most recognizable names in design and productivity software, yet they serve different end markets. Adobe dominates creative, document, and digital-marketing workflows, while Autodesk anchors software for the built world and manufacturing. This stock comparison is relevant for growth and technology investors weighing AI-driven software opportunities, as well as traders assessing relative performance, valuation, and momentum between two established leaders. By examining recent market activity, growth drivers, and risk factors, this article provides a factual, side-by-side view of how the two companies currently compare.
Adobe is a leader in creative software (Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere), document tools (Acrobat), and customer-experience platforms. In its most recent quarter, the company reported record revenue of $6.76 billion, up 13% year over year, and non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share of $6.13. Total annualized recurring revenue (ARR) reached $27.50 billion, up 11.2% year over year, while AI-first ARR grew more than 150% to over $650 million. Adobe also surpassed one billion monthly active users across its products.
Despite these results, sentiment has been mixed. The company raised its full-year revenue and earnings outlook, but shares remain roughly one-third below their 52-week high. Investor caution reflects a deliberate shift toward a freemium model that prioritizes user acquisition over near-term ARR, an announced leadership transition, and intensifying competition from AI-native rivals. In recent market activity, the stock has traded at a low forward earnings multiple, indicating the market is pricing in slower, maturing growth even as AI engagement accelerates.
Autodesk provides design, engineering, and construction software, anchored by AutoCAD and extending into platforms such as Revit, Fusion, and Forma. In its latest quarter, revenue rose 16.1% year over year to $2.05 billion, with non-GAAP earnings per share of $3.30. Annualized recurring revenue reached $7.54 billion, up 13% year over year, while billings grew roughly 10%. The company raised its full-year revenue and earnings guidance, partly reflecting the contribution of the MaintainX acquisition.
Autodesk's recent performance has been solid on the top line, but the stock has also faced pressure. Shares declined after the latest earnings report despite the beat, reflecting a sales-channel reorganization that has temporarily slowed new business generation, softer performance in Western Europe, and integration costs tied to acquisitions. Management has emphasized a "project intelligence" strategy that links design, construction, and operations data, positioning AI as a differentiator through domain-specific context rather than generic models.
For traders who prefer a data-driven, systematic approach to evaluating names like these, Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and set of securities it trades. Because not every bot suits every market regime, only the most relevant and best-performing robots for current conditions earn a place in this featured section. Browsing the selection lets users compare win rates, trade frequency, and historical results across different approaches. To explore which automated strategies are currently trending, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Although both are subscription-software franchises, Adobe and Autodesk differ meaningfully in business model and exposure. Adobe skews toward broad consumer and enterprise creativity, with a massive freemium funnel and significant AI-native competition from the likes of OpenAI, Midjourney, and Canva. Autodesk serves a narrower professional base in AEC and manufacturing, where switching costs are high and domain-specific data creates a competitive moat, though its customer base is more cyclical and tied to capital spending.
On growth, Autodesk has posted faster recent revenue expansion (16% versus 13% for Adobe's latest quarter), while Adobe generates far greater scale and cash flow. Valuation diverges sharply: Adobe trades at a single-digit forward earnings multiple, whereas Autodesk commands a meaningfully higher multiple, reflecting its steadier momentum and margin trajectory. Risk profiles also differ. Adobe's key uncertainty is whether AI monetization can offset slower subscription growth, while Autodesk's risks center on sales reorganization execution and acquisition integration.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward ADSK at present. Autodesk has demonstrated comparatively more consistent revenue momentum, expanding operating margins, and a clearer path to AI monetization through domain-specific data. Adobe's trend is less favorable given its deeper drawdown from highs and investor skepticism around freemium conversion. That said, this is a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive call: Adobe's low valuation, strong cash generation, and accelerating AI-first ARR could support a reversal if sentiment shifts, while Autodesk's transitional execution risks warrant monitoring. As always, these conclusions depend on prevailing trend data and are subject to change.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
ADBE | ADSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ADBE's Valuation (61) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (74). This means that ADBE’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADBE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (100). This means that ADBE’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADBE's SMR Rating (19) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (20). This means that ADBE’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADBE's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (63). This means that ADBE’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADBE's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (96). This means that ADBE’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
| ADBE | ADSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 72% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADBE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while ADSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADBE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ADSK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADBE (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while ADSK (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.25%.
ADBE is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2026.
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADBE has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADBE jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADBE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADBE | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| WDAY - ADBE | 75% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| ADSK - ADBE | 73% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| INTU - ADBE | 70% Closely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| MANH - ADBE | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
| PCTY - ADBE | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.83% | ||
More | ||||