Advertisement
ADSK vs CLSK
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Autodesk (ADSK) vs. CleanSpark (CLSK) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Autodesk (ADSK) is a mature design-software leader with recurring subscription revenue, while CleanSpark (CLSK) is a pure-play Bitcoin miner whose fortunes are tightly linked to cryptocurrency prices.
- ADSK has demonstrated consistent double-digit revenue growth (approximately 12–18% year-over-year) supported by AI integration and cloud platform expansion, whereas CLSK's revenue is highly cyclical and sensitive to Bitcoin's price swings.
- CLSK has posted a year-to-date gain of roughly 29%, significantly outperforming ADSK's decline of approximately 26% over the same period, though CLSK's month-over-month performance has seen pullbacks exceeding 20%.
- Volatility profiles diverge sharply: CLSK carries a beta of 3.84, making it far more reactive to broader market and crypto sentiment than ADSK, which exhibits the stability typical of large-cap enterprise software.
- Analyst consensus on ADSK skews positive with multiple Buy and Outperform ratings, while CLSK navigates a more speculative backdrop with elevated short interest above 30% of its float.
- An AI-driven evaluation suggests ADSK currently presents a more consistent trend profile, while CLSK offers higher potential upside accompanied by substantially greater risk.
Introduction
Comparing ADSK and CLSK means contrasting two fundamentally different corners of the equity market. Autodesk, a decades-old software infrastructure giant, provides mission-critical design and engineering tools to industries ranging from architecture to entertainment. CleanSpark, by contrast, operates as one of America's largest publicly traded Bitcoin miners, a sector defined by high beta, rapid expansion, and exposure to the volatile digital-asset landscape. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors weighing stable, cash-flow-generative technology franchises against high-growth, commodity-linked disruptors. Both stocks have delivered dramatically different outcomes in 2026 so far, making a side-by-side analysis timely for those recalibrating portfolio allocations across risk profiles.
ADSK Overview and Recent Performance
Autodesk (ADSK) is a global leader in 3D design, engineering, and entertainment software, with flagship products including AutoCAD, Revit, and Fusion 360, alongside its rapidly growing Autodesk Construction Cloud platform. The company serves customers across architecture, engineering, construction, manufacturing, and media. In recent market activity, ADSK shares have faced headwinds, declining roughly 26% year-to-date, though the stock has shown signs of stabilization with a roughly 13% bounce over the trailing month. The company's fiscal 2026 revenue reached approximately $7.2 billion, representing an 18% year-over-year increase, with non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) of $5.23. Analysts have noted improving operating margins and the successful integration of AI-powered features—such as auto-constraints in Fusion, which now achieve over 60% user acceptance. Deutsche Bank upgraded ADSK to Buy in late 2025, and Wells Fargo and Rosenblatt have maintained bullish ratings. The company's subscription-based revenue model provides strong cash flow visibility, and its free cash flow yield continues to attract institutional interest. That said, a put/call ratio above 1.4 indicates that options-market sentiment has leaned bearish, reflecting broader macro caution around software valuations.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark (CLSK) has carved out a position as one of the largest pure-play Bitcoin mining companies in the United States. The firm owns and operates data centers across Georgia, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Wyoming, with total contracted power capacity recently surpassing 1 gigawatt (GW). As of its latest operational update, CleanSpark reported an operational hashrate of approximately 50 exahash per second (EH/s, a measure of computational power dedicated to mining Bitcoin) and held over 12,700 self-mined Bitcoin on its balance sheet. CLSK shares have delivered a year-to-date return of roughly 29%, driven in part by Bitcoin reaching new all-time highs above $120,000. However, the stock's journey has been volatile: a one-month pullback of more than 22% illustrates the speed at which sentiment can shift. The company's revenue for fiscal 2025 reached approximately $766 million, more than doubling year-over-year, though quarterly results have oscillated between large profits and steep operating losses depending on Bitcoin prices and impairment charges. With a beta near 3.84, CLSK ranks among the most volatile names on the Nasdaq, and short interest exceeding 30% of its float underscores the market's divided opinion on its trajectory.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking data-driven guidance amid such divergent stock profiles, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of automated trading bots covering thousands of tickers, yet only a subset makes it into this featured section—those that have demonstrated the strongest adaptability to prevailing market conditions. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, from short-term momentum-based strategies to longer-duration trend-following approaches, and each bot is defined by its own statistical profile, including win rates, annualized returns, and risk metrics. Many of the featured bots exhibit win rates in the range of 60–80% and have generated annualized returns that materially outpace benchmark indices in backtesting. Whether a trader is focused on a steady enterprise-software name or a high-volatility cryptocurrency-linked miner, the Trending AI Robots section can serve as a practical screening tool to identify strategies aligned with current market dynamics. Explore the Trending AI Robots to see which bots are capturing the market's attention right now.
Head-to-Head Comparison
At the business-model level, ADSK and CLSK could hardly be more different. Autodesk generates predictable, high-margin recurring revenue from subscriptions and cloud services, with gross margins consistently above 90%. CleanSpark's revenue, by contrast, depends directly on Bitcoin prices, network difficulty, and energy costs—variables largely outside management's control. On growth drivers, ADSK benefits from secular tailwinds in digital transformation, AI-assisted design, and infrastructure construction, while CLSK rides the adoption curve of Bitcoin as an institutional asset class.
Risk factors present a sharp contrast: ADSK's main vulnerability is macroeconomic softening that could slow enterprise software spending, a risk partially mitigated by its diversified end markets. CLSK faces binary risks including regulatory crackdowns on cryptocurrency, sustained Bitcoin price declines, rising electricity costs, and dilution from equity-financed expansion. Market sentiment also splits along these lines. ADSK enjoys broad institutional ownership with over 2,300 funds holding positions, while CLSK, despite 91% institutional ownership, contends with an exceptionally high short-interest ratio, indicating substantial bearish conviction alongside bullish positioning.
Sector exposure is another differentiator. ADSK sits within the software-infrastructure space, where valuation multiples are supported by recurring revenue and cash-flow generation. CLSK resides in the crypto-mining ecosystem, where valuations swing dramatically with digital-asset prices and often disconnect from traditional fundamental metrics. For portfolio construction, ADSK has historically served as a compounder with moderate volatility, while CLSK functions more as a leveraged proxy for Bitcoin itself.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, stability of revenue generation, and relative risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely favor ADSK for investors prioritizing trend reliability and lower drawdown risk. ADSK's improving operating margins, robust free cash flow, and expanding AI capabilities form a foundation of measurable, recurring catalysts. CleanSpark (CLSK) may appeal to algorithms tuned for momentum and volatility capture—particularly when Bitcoin trends higher—but its elevated beta, extreme quarterly earnings swings, and substantial short interest introduce variables that reduce probabilistic confidence in sustained directional movement. In the current environment, where Bitcoin's rally has already extended meaningfully and ADSK has pulled back to more historically favorable valuation levels, the balance of observable signals tilts toward the software leader's more predictable trajectory. This assessment reflects a probabilistic, model-driven view rather than any definitive forecast.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADSK is a Hold and CLSK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ADSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ADSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.44% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +21.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.02%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.90% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.85% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| ADSK | CLSK | ADSK / CLSK | |
| Capitalization | 43.3B | 4B | 1,081% |
| EBITDA | 2.33B | -69.3M | -3,358% |
| Gain YTD | -30.658 | 54.249 | -57% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.96 | 7.38 | 406% |
| Revenue | 7.51B | 740M | 1,014% |
| Total Cash | 2.92B | 935M | 313% |
| Total Debt | 2.72B | 1.79B | 152% |
ADSK | CLSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as ADSK (74) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ADSK (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (99) in the null industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as ADSK (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as ADSK (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
| ADSK | CLSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 12 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
ADSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADSK has been closely correlated with BSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADSK jumps, then BSY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| BSY - ADSK | 68% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| PTC - ADSK | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| CLSK - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| CRWD - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| PANW - ADSK | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||