ADSK
Price
$198.43
Change
-$7.14 (-3.47%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
41.9B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CRM
Price
$165.89
Change
-$0.56 (-0.34%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
135.86B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ADSK vs CRM

Header iconADSK vs CRM Comparison
Open Charts ADSK vs CRMBanner chart's image
ADSK vs CRM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Autodesk (ADSK) vs. Salesforce (CRM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Autodesk (ADSK) and Salesforce (CRM) operate in the enterprise software sector but serve distinct markets, with ADSK focused on design and engineering tools and CRM on customer relationship management platforms.
  • In recent market activity, both stocks have experienced volatility amid broader sector concerns over artificial intelligence (AI) disruption, with ADSK trading near $241 and CRM near $180 as of late May 2026.
  • ADSK shows relatively more stable year-to-date performance compared to CRM, which has faced steeper declines in some reports amid earnings scrutiny and competitive pressures.
  • Upcoming earnings reports for both companies in late May provide near-term catalysts that could influence sentiment in the software space.
  • Sector exposure to cloud computing and AI integration remains a shared growth driver, though execution and monetization timelines differ.
  • Risk factors include high valuations typical of growth-oriented software names and sensitivity to macroeconomic shifts affecting enterprise spending.

Introduction

Autodesk (ADSK) and Salesforce (CRM) represent prominent players in the enterprise software industry, making them relevant for comparison among investors and traders seeking exposure to technology-driven growth. This analysis examines their business models, recent price behavior, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Professionals monitoring software sector trends, as well as those evaluating diversification within technology holdings, may find this stock comparison useful for assessing momentum, catalysts, and potential trade-offs between the two names.

ADSK Overview and Recent Performance

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) develops design, engineering, and entertainment software solutions used across architecture, manufacturing, and media industries. The company has shifted toward subscription-based revenue, supporting recurring income streams. In recent market activity, ADSK shares have traded in a consolidation phase around the $240 level, with modest gains in the past month offset by broader year-to-date declines. Upcoming first-quarter earnings, expected May 28, represent a key near-term focus, with analysts anticipating revenue growth tied to cloud adoption and AI-enhanced features. Sentiment has been influenced by the stock’s position well below its 52-week high, reflecting sector-wide rotation pressures while highlighting potential resilience from its specialized vertical markets.

CRM Overview and Recent Performance

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) provides cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) and enterprise applications that help businesses manage sales, service, and marketing operations. The company continues to expand its AI offerings while navigating integration challenges from prior acquisitions. Recent market activity shows CRM shares fluctuating near $180, with reports indicating notable year-to-date pressure amid concerns over AI competition and slower monetization of new features. Broader software sector rotation and enterprise spending caution have weighed on performance. Analysts are watching the upcoming earnings release for insights into growth sustainability and margin trends, as the stock remains sensitive to shifts in investor appetite for high-growth technology names.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable AI trading bots from a portfolio of hundreds that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the best-performing and most aligned with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots exhibit a wide range of annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, profit factors, and drawdown statistics, with select models historically achieving returns exceeding 100% in forward-tested scenarios across various assets. These robots employ diverse trading styles, strategies, and timeframes tailored to different market environments. Investors interested in algorithmic approaches to equities like ADSK or CRM can explore the platform for additional context on automated strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Autodesk (ADSK) and Salesforce (CRM) differ in business focus, with ADSK emphasizing specialized design software and CRM prioritizing broad customer engagement platforms. Growth drivers for ADSK center on vertical industry adoption and subscription expansion, while CRM relies on platform ecosystem development and AI integration across sales and service functions. Recent momentum shows ADSK exhibiting comparatively steadier price action amid sector headwinds, whereas CRM has encountered more pronounced volatility linked to earnings expectations and competitive narratives. Risk factors for both include valuation multiples typical of software leaders and exposure to enterprise budget cycles; however, ADSK’s narrower market focus may offer different sensitivity compared to CRM’s wider addressable market. Market sentiment reflects ongoing evaluation of AI capabilities, with each company positioned differently in terms of execution timelines and customer retention metrics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term behavior to ADSK over CRM. This assessment draws from ADSK’s more contained drawdowns and upcoming earnings visibility, alongside CRM’s broader sensitivity to sector rotation. Such probabilistic indications remain subject to evolving data and do not constitute definitive forecasts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ADSK vs. CRM commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADSK is a Hold and CRM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (ADSK: $198.43 vs. CRM: $165.89)
Brand notoriety: ADSK and CRM are both notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ADSK: 246% vs. CRM: 99%
Market capitalization -- ADSK: $41.9B vs. CRM: $135.86B
ADSK [@Packaged Software] is valued at $41.9B. CRM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $135.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ADSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRM is a better buy in the long-term than ADSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ADSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ADSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ADSK is a better buy in the short-term than CRM.

Price Growth

ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -13.71% price change this week, while CRM (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

ADSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

CRM is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRM($136B) has a higher market cap than ADSK($41.9B). ADSK has higher P/E ratio than CRM: ADSK (28.97) vs CRM (19.22). ADSK YTD gains are higher at: -32.965 vs. CRM (-37.060). CRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.7B vs. ADSK (2.33B). ADSK has more cash in the bank: 2.92B vs. CRM (1.8B). ADSK has less debt than CRM: ADSK (2.72B) vs CRM (41.9B). CRM has higher revenues than ADSK: CRM (42.8B) vs ADSK (7.51B).
ADSKCRMADSK / CRM
Capitalization41.9B136B31%
EBITDA2.33B13.7B17%
Gain YTD-32.965-37.06089%
P/E Ratio28.9719.22151%
Revenue7.51B42.8B18%
Total Cash2.92B1.8B162%
Total Debt2.72B41.9B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ADSK vs CRM: Fundamental Ratings
ADSK
CRM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5458
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
2052
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6564
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9594
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRM's Valuation (15) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADSK (76). This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (100). This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.

ADSK's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CRM (52). This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (65). This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (95). This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ADSKCRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ADSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TG8.190.19
+2.37%
Tredegar Corp
ARLO12.920.21
+1.65%
Arlo Technologies
NEE85.991.15
+1.36%
Nextera Energy Inc
QCLS3.870.05
+1.31%
Q/C Technologies Inc
OWL9.68-0.04
-0.41%
Blue Owl Capital

ADSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADSK has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ADSK jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ADSK
1D Price
Change %
ADSK100%
-3.47%
CLSK - ADSK
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
CRWD - ADSK
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
BSY - ADSK
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
CRM - ADSK
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
PANW - ADSK
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More

CRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRM
1D Price
Change %
CRM100%
-0.34%
HUBS - CRM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
WDAY - CRM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
TEAM - CRM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
ADBE - CRM
70%
Closely correlated
-6.76%
DT - CRM
68%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
More