Autodesk (ADSK) and Salesforce (CRM) represent prominent players in the enterprise software industry, making them relevant for comparison among investors and traders seeking exposure to technology-driven growth. This analysis examines their business models, recent price behavior, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Professionals monitoring software sector trends, as well as those evaluating diversification within technology holdings, may find this stock comparison useful for assessing momentum, catalysts, and potential trade-offs between the two names.
Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) develops design, engineering, and entertainment software solutions used across architecture, manufacturing, and media industries. The company has shifted toward subscription-based revenue, supporting recurring income streams. In recent market activity, ADSK shares have traded in a consolidation phase around the $240 level, with modest gains in the past month offset by broader year-to-date declines. Upcoming first-quarter earnings, expected May 28, represent a key near-term focus, with analysts anticipating revenue growth tied to cloud adoption and AI-enhanced features. Sentiment has been influenced by the stock’s position well below its 52-week high, reflecting sector-wide rotation pressures while highlighting potential resilience from its specialized vertical markets.
Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) provides cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) and enterprise applications that help businesses manage sales, service, and marketing operations. The company continues to expand its AI offerings while navigating integration challenges from prior acquisitions. Recent market activity shows CRM shares fluctuating near $180, with reports indicating notable year-to-date pressure amid concerns over AI competition and slower monetization of new features. Broader software sector rotation and enterprise spending caution have weighed on performance. Analysts are watching the upcoming earnings release for insights into growth sustainability and margin trends, as the stock remains sensitive to shifts in investor appetite for high-growth technology names.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable AI trading bots from a portfolio of hundreds that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the best-performing and most aligned with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots exhibit a wide range of annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, profit factors, and drawdown statistics, with select models historically achieving returns exceeding 100% in forward-tested scenarios across various assets. These robots employ diverse trading styles, strategies, and timeframes tailored to different market environments. Investors interested in algorithmic approaches to equities like ADSK or CRM can explore the platform for additional context on automated strategies.
Autodesk (ADSK) and Salesforce (CRM) differ in business focus, with ADSK emphasizing specialized design software and CRM prioritizing broad customer engagement platforms. Growth drivers for ADSK center on vertical industry adoption and subscription expansion, while CRM relies on platform ecosystem development and AI integration across sales and service functions. Recent momentum shows ADSK exhibiting comparatively steadier price action amid sector headwinds, whereas CRM has encountered more pronounced volatility linked to earnings expectations and competitive narratives. Risk factors for both include valuation multiples typical of software leaders and exposure to enterprise budget cycles; however, ADSK’s narrower market focus may offer different sensitivity compared to CRM’s wider addressable market. Market sentiment reflects ongoing evaluation of AI capabilities, with each company positioned differently in terms of execution timelines and customer retention metrics.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term behavior to ADSK over CRM. This assessment draws from ADSK’s more contained drawdowns and upcoming earnings visibility, alongside CRM’s broader sensitivity to sector rotation. Such probabilistic indications remain subject to evolving data and do not constitute definitive forecasts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -13.71% price change this week, while CRM (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ADSK | CRM | ADSK / CRM | |
| Capitalization | 41.9B | 136B | 31% |
| EBITDA | 2.33B | 13.7B | 17% |
| Gain YTD | -32.965 | -37.060 | 89% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.97 | 19.22 | 151% |
| Revenue | 7.51B | 42.8B | 18% |
| Total Cash | 2.92B | 1.8B | 162% |
| Total Debt | 2.72B | 41.9B | 7% |
ADSK | CRM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (15) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADSK (76). This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (100). This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CRM (52). This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (65). This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (95). This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
| ADSK | CRM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 64% | 14 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADSK has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ADSK jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADSK | 100% | -3.47% | ||
| CLSK - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| CRWD - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| BSY - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| CRM - ADSK | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| PANW - ADSK | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| WDAY - CRM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| TEAM - CRM | 71% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| ADBE - CRM | 70% Closely correlated | -6.76% | ||
| DT - CRM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
More | ||||