AEM
Price
$168.59
Change
+$1.82 (+1.09%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
82.09B
29 days until earnings call
BCEKF
Price
$0.47
Change
+$0.07 (+17.50%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
111.06M
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs BCEKF

Header iconAEM vs BCEKF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs BCEKFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$168.59
Change+$1.82 (+1.09%)
Volume$35.38K
Capitalization82.09B
Bear Creek Mining
Price$0.47
Change+$0.07 (+17.50%)
Volume$2.3M
Capitalization111.06M
AEM vs BCEKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. BCEKF commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and BCEKF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $166.77 vs. BCEKF: $0.47)
Brand notoriety: AEM and BCEKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 138% vs. BCEKF: 442%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $82.09B vs. BCEKF: $111.06M
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $82.09B. BCEKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $111.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $107.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBCEKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BCEKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the long-term than BCEKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCEKF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BCEKF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCEKF is a better buy in the short-term than AEM.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while BCEKF (@Precious Metals) price change was +54.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6148.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

BCEKF is expected to report earnings on Nov 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($82.1B) has a higher market cap than BCEKF($111M). AEM YTD gains are higher at: 115.459 vs. BCEKF (100.296). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.07B vs. BCEKF (-19.66M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. BCEKF (4.78M). BCEKF has less debt than AEM: BCEKF (75.3M) vs AEM (734M). AEM has higher revenues than BCEKF: AEM (9.66B) vs BCEKF (106M).
AEMBCEKFAEM / BCEKF
Capitalization82.1B111M73,964%
EBITDA6.07B-19.66M-30,888%
Gain YTD115.459100.296115%
P/E Ratio28.36N/A-
Revenue9.66B106M9,117%
Total Cash1.57B4.78M32,804%
Total Debt734M75.3M975%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs BCEKF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
BCEKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2732
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18100
SMR RATING
1..100
5799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3834
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9693
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCEKF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (96). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BCEKF (100). This means that AEM’s stock grew significantly faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCEKF (99). This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCEKF’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (38). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

BCEKF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (96). This means that BCEKF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMBCEKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BCEKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOPPY13.441.50
+12.59%
TOPPAN HOLDINGS INC.
CHGCY21.330.35
+1.67%
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
ATVDY6.34N/A
N/A
Atresmedia Corporacion De Medios De Comunicacion
CBBI10.85N/A
N/A
CBB Bancorp, Inc.
TCRI0.18N/A
N/A
TECHCOM INC.