AEM
Price
$153.33
Change
+$0.93 (+0.61%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
76.42B
41 days until earnings call
LGDTF
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
194.97M
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs LGDTF

Header iconAEM vs LGDTF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs LGDTFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$153.33
Change+$0.93 (+0.61%)
Volume$28.92K
Capitalization76.42B
Liberty Gold
Price$0.42
Change-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Volume$597.3K
Capitalization194.97M
AEM vs LGDTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGDTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. LGDTF commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a StrongBuy and LGDTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $153.20 vs. LGDTF: $0.41)
Brand notoriety: AEM and LGDTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 145% vs. LGDTF: 64%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $76.42B vs. LGDTF: $194.97M
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $76.42B. LGDTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $194.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $95.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLGDTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LGDTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the long-term than LGDTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGDTF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LGDTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGDTF is a better buy in the short-term than AEM.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while LGDTF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3132.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

LGDTF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.45% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($76.4B) has a higher market cap than LGDTF($195M). LGDTF YTD gains are higher at: 129.219 vs. AEM (97.928). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.07B vs. LGDTF (-17.58M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. LGDTF (17.7M). LGDTF has less debt than AEM: LGDTF (290K) vs AEM (734M). AEM has higher revenues than LGDTF: AEM (9.66B) vs LGDTF (0).
AEMLGDTFAEM / LGDTF
Capitalization76.4B195M39,179%
EBITDA6.07B-17.58M-34,537%
Gain YTD97.928129.21976%
P/E Ratio26.05N/A-
Revenue9.66B0-
Total Cash1.57B17.7M8,864%
Total Debt734M290K253,103%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs LGDTF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
LGDTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2124
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
5798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9721
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGDTF's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (96). This means that LGDTF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGDTF (100). This means that AEM’s stock grew significantly faster than LGDTF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGDTF (98). This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGDTF’s over the last 12 months.

LGDTF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (39). This means that LGDTF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LGDTF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (97). This means that LGDTF’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMLGDTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGDTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRTC36.11N/A
+0.01%
Xtrackers US National Crtcl Techs ETF
SROI32.85-0.05
-0.14%
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sus Eqs ETF
SPXL204.86-0.72
-0.35%
Direxion Daily S&P500® Bull 3X ETF
ENDW30.22-0.11
-0.36%
Cambria Endowment Style ETF
ETO27.40-0.11
-0.42%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Div Oppor Fund

LGDTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGDTF has been loosely correlated with EQX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGDTF jumps, then EQX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGDTF
1D Price
Change %
LGDTF100%
-2.33%
EQX - LGDTF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
AEM - LGDTF
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
PAAS - LGDTF
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
KGC - LGDTF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
WPM - LGDTF
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More