AEM
Price
$115.90
Change
-$7.15 (-5.81%)
Updated
Jun 27, 01:01 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.62B
33 days until earnings call
NESRF
Price
$12.95
Change
-$0.63 (-4.64%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.97B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs NESRF

Header iconAEM vs NESRF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs NESRFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$115.90
Change-$7.15 (-5.81%)
Volume$4.86K
Capitalization29.62B
Northern Star Resources
Price$12.95
Change-$0.63 (-4.64%)
Volume$15.77K
Capitalization8.97B
AEM vs NESRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. NESRF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and NESRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $123.05 vs. NESRF: $12.95)
Brand notoriety: AEM and NESRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 98% vs. NESRF: 165%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $29.62B vs. NESRF: $8.97B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $29.62B. NESRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNESRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NESRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NESRF is a better buy in the long-term than AEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while NESRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.04% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($29.6B) has a higher market cap than NESRF($8.97B). NESRF has higher P/E ratio than AEM: NESRF (61.35) vs AEM (15.52). AEM YTD gains are higher at: 58.534 vs. NESRF (30.808). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.94B vs. NESRF (657M). NESRF has more cash in the bank: 571M vs. AEM (349M). NESRF has less debt than AEM: NESRF (512M) vs AEM (2.01B). AEM has higher revenues than NESRF: AEM (6.63B) vs NESRF (3.88B).
AEMNESRFAEM / NESRF
Capitalization29.6B8.97B330%
EBITDA3.94B657M600%
Gain YTD58.53430.808190%
P/E Ratio15.5261.3525%
Revenue6.63B3.88B171%
Total Cash349M571M61%
Total Debt2.01B512M392%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs NESRF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
NESRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7189
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2571
SMR RATING
1..100
6391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9831
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NESRF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (96). This means that NESRF’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NESRF (71). This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NESRF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as NESRF (91). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to NESRF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as NESRF (39). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to NESRF’s over the last 12 months.

NESRF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (98). This means that NESRF’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGHSX36.77N/A
N/A
Hartford Healthcare R4
WFPAX45.82N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value A
ABCSX15.95N/A
N/A
AB Discovery Value C
PJRQX9.06N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq R6
FQUAX20.45N/A
N/A
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N

NESRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NESRF and AEM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NESRF and AEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NESRF
1D Price
Change %
NESRF100%
-4.67%
AEM - NESRF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
AU - NESRF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
RGLD - NESRF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
AGI - NESRF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
WPM - NESRF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More