Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPGX vs LMGRX
AEPGX vs LMGRX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs LMGRX
AEPGX vs LMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. LMGRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Buy and LMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. LMGRX (6.64B). AEPGX pays higher dividends than LMGRX: AEPGX (2.48) vs LMGRX (1.12). AEPGX was incepted earlier than LMGRX: AEPGX (42 years) vs LMGRX (20 years). LMGRX (1.40) is less costly to investors than AEPGX (0.83). LMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. AEPGX (50.00). LMGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPGX: LMGRX (0) vs AEPGX (250). AEPGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. LMGRX (-4.76). LMGRX return over 5 years is better than : 3.32 vs. AEPGX (-4.41).
| AEPGX | LMGRX | AEPGX / LMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.40 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.40 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.924 | -0.721 | -961% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 6.64B | 2,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 1.12 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | -4.76 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.47 | 29.94 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.41 | 3.32 | -133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.08 | 113.88 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement