It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCULP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CULP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AIN (@Textiles) experienced а -2.28% price change this week, while CULP (@Textiles) price change was -4.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Textiles industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.68%.
AIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
CULP is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The textiles industry includes companies that spin fiber and weave fabrics into raw products such as polyester filaments and staple yarns that are manufactured into finished products. Albany International Corp., Unifi, Inc. and Culp, Inc. are some of the major players in this business.
AIN | CULP | AIN / CULP | |
Capitalization | 2.83B | 59.9M | 4,721% |
EBITDA | 257M | -4.97M | -5,167% |
Gain YTD | -17.756 | -12.435 | 143% |
P/E Ratio | 25.54 | 12.29 | 208% |
Revenue | 1.15B | 237M | 484% |
Total Cash | 173M | 13.5M | 1,281% |
Total Debt | 515M | 5.18M | 9,942% |
AIN | CULP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CULP's Valuation (33) in the Textiles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AIN (88). This means that CULP’s stock grew somewhat faster than AIN’s over the last 12 months.
AIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as CULP (100). This means that AIN’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
AIN's SMR Rating (65) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as CULP (91). This means that AIN’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
AIN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as CULP (57). This means that AIN’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
AIN's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as CULP (100). This means that AIN’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
AIN | CULP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago61% | 3 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 5 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago73% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
AMRMX | 58.85 | -0.51 | -0.86% |
American Funds American Mutual A | |||
BIBDX | 12.90 | -0.16 | -1.23% |
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl | |||
MFLDX | 23.76 | -0.35 | -1.45% |
Cromwell Long Short Institutional | |||
GCTRX | 47.48 | -0.74 | -1.53% |
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq R6 | |||
BRWVX | 25.72 | -0.62 | -2.35% |
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R6 |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AIN and CULP have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIN and CULP's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AIN | 100% | -0.53% | ||
CULP - AIN | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
TRYIY - AIN | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
SHZHY - AIN | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
UFI - AIN | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
TRYIF - AIN | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CULP and UFI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CULP and UFI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CULP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CULP | 100% | +0.80% | ||
UFI - CULP | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
AIN - CULP | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
TRYIY - CULP | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
SHZHY - CULP | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
LNZNF - CULP | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |