Advertisement
AKR vs FRT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) vs. Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) shows stronger year-to-date performance at around 13%, compared to Acadia Realty Trust's (AKR) 2%, reflecting better momentum in recent market activity.
- Both are retail-focused real estate investment trusts (REITs), but FRT offers a higher dividend yield near 4% with a 58-year increase streak, versus AKR's 3.8%.
- AKR trades at a significantly higher trailing P/E ratio over 200 due to lower EPS, while FRT's is around 24, indicating more reasonable valuation.
- Recent analyst updates for AKR include price target raises to $22, signaling moderate optimism amid retail recovery.
- FRT benefits from strong leasing spreads around 15% and mixed-use developments in high-demand coastal areas.
Introduction
Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) are prominent retail REITs navigating a recovering commercial real estate landscape. This comparison analyzes their business models, recent stock performance, and market positioning to help income-focused investors and traders evaluate relative strengths. With retail sectors rebounding amid e-commerce integration and consumer spending resilience, understanding contrasts in portfolio quality, dividend reliability, and momentum can inform portfolio decisions in the current environment.
AKR Overview and Recent Performance
Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) is a self-managed REIT specializing in street and urban retail properties across major U.S. markets. Its portfolio emphasizes high-barrier-to-entry locations with grocery-anchored centers. In recent weeks, AKR shares have gained about 9% over the past month, supported by analyst price target increases to $22 from firms like JPMorgan, reflecting improved leasing activity and operational stability. Year-to-date gains stand at roughly 2%, lagging broader REIT indices due to a high trailing P/E above 200 from modest EPS of $0.10. Sentiment has been buoyed by recent earnings anticipation on April 28, with focus on funds from operations (FFO, a key REIT profitability metric excluding depreciation). Challenges include higher beta (1.13) indicating volatility sensitivity.
FRT Overview and Recent Performance
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) owns and operates premium open-air shopping centers and mixed-use properties in affluent coastal regions, prioritizing community destinations like Santana Row. Recent market activity has driven shares up over 13% year-to-date and 23% annually, outperforming peers amid robust leasing spreads near 15%. Trading around $112 with a market cap of $9.7 billion, FRT maintains a trailing P/E of 24 and EPS of $4.68, underpinned by $1.28 billion in trailing revenue. Its 4% dividend yield and 58-year consecutive increases attract income investors. Upcoming Q1 earnings on May 1 expect FFO of $1.82 per share, with beta near 1 signaling market-aligned stability. Positive sentiment stems from redevelopment projects and demographic tailwinds.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 350 total bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only 25 elite bots earn a spot here based on current market suitability, featuring metrics like win rates exceeding 60%, profit factors above 1.5, and average gains from 2-5% per trade in backtested periods. These automated systems employ pattern recognition, momentum signals, and risk management tailored to volatile conditions, including REIT sectors. Traders can explore bots with varying trade frequencies—from daily scalps to swing trades—offering transparency via performance stats and live signals. Visit the page to identify bots potentially suited for AKR or FRT exposure amid evolving retail trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both AKR and FRT operate in retail REITs but differ in scale and focus: AKR's urban/street emphasis contrasts FRT's larger mixed-use coastal portfolio, exposing FRT to stronger demographic growth drivers. Recent momentum favors FRT's 13% YTD gains versus AKR's 2%, with FRT's lower P/E (24 vs. 209) and higher ROE highlighting better profitability. Dividend yields are comparable (4% vs. 3.8%), but FRT's payout history provides superior reliability. Risk profiles show AKR's higher beta (1.13 vs. 0.99) amplifying market swings, while FRT's debt/equity (144%) exceeds AKR's (73%), though both maintain investment-grade ratings. Sector exposure ties to retail recovery, but FRT's leasing momentum and catalysts like redevelopments offer trade-offs in growth potential over AKR's value positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward FRT due to its superior trend consistency, higher stability via balanced beta and ROE, and positive catalysts like strong FFO expectations and leasing spreads. AKR shows relative value but trails in momentum and earnings quality. This probabilistic edge favors FRT for traders eyeing sustained retail REIT positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKR is a StrongBuy and FRT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AKR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AKR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AKR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AKR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AKR (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.38% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
AKR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
FRT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+3.49% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| AKR | FRT | AKR / FRT | |
| Capitalization | 2.95B | 10.9B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 363M | 1.09B | 33% |
| Gain YTD | 8.697 | 27.614 | 31% |
| P/E Ratio | 71.26 | 21.81 | 327% |
| Revenue | 409M | 1.31B | 31% |
| Total Cash | 31.4M | 116M | 27% |
| Total Debt | 1.65B | 4.93B | 34% |
AKR | FRT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 14 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRT's Valuation (63) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AKR (70). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to AKR’s over the last 12 months.
FRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AKR (67). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to AKR’s over the last 12 months.
FRT's SMR Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AKR (91). This means that FRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AKR’s over the last 12 months.
FRT's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AKR (47). This means that FRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AKR’s over the last 12 months.
FRT's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AKR (88). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to AKR’s over the last 12 months.
| AKR | FRT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 46% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 56% | 15 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 40% |
Advertisement
FRT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with AKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then AKR could also see price increases.